Surface-Dependent Interfacial Characteristics of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars in Concrete

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Surface-Dependent Interfacial Characteristics of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars in Concrete

Author(s): Yail J. Kim and Ali Alatify

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 120

Issue: 3

Appears on pages(s): 17-29

Keywords: bond; fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP); interface; mode of failure; reinforcement; surface characteristics

DOI: 10.14359/51738346

Date: 5/1/2023

Abstract:
This paper presents the interfacial behavior of glass fiberreinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcement embedded in concrete with variable surface geometries. The configurational properties of the reinforcing bars involve a relative rib area of 0.012 to 0.093 and a crest-depth ratio of 4.5 to 50. A total of 90 specimens are tested to establish a relationship between the load-carrying capacity and topographical attributes of the interface for shearing and splitting failure modes. On the basis of multiscale image analysis, the influence of the rib arrangement is accounted for. The interfacial capacity increases with the enlarged relative rib area, while an opposite tendency is noticed with the crest-depth ratio. The load-displacement response and energy dissipation of the interface are dominated by the surface deformations. Contrary to the shearing failure associated with a local sliding path, the splitting failure results in radial cracking as a function of the relative rib area. The topographical characteristics of the failed interface articulate that the adjusted rib depth is responsible for the distribution and coalescence of concrete residues on the reinforcing bars, which are related to the degree of interaction against the substrate. Furthermore, the critical failure plane of the interface is identified through surface texture measurements. Analytical modeling determines a bursting force for the GFRP reinforcement, different from that of conventional steel reinforcing bars, and assesses the sensitivity of constituting parameters. In conjunction with probability distributions and complexity theory, the functional compliance of the model is evaluated and its applicable range is suggested.

Related References:

1. Nawy, E. G., Prestressed Concrete, fifth edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2009.

2. Goto, Y., “Cracks Formed in Concrete around Deformed Tension Bars,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 68, No. 4, Apr. 1971, pp. 244-251.

3. Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 408, “Bond and Development of Straight Reinforcing Bars in Tension (ACI 408R-03),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2003, 49 pp.

4. Choi, O. C., and Choi, H., “Bearing Angle Model for Bond of Reinforcing Bars in Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2017, pp. 245-253.

5. Bamonte, P. F., and Gambarova, P. G., “High-Bond Bars in NSC and HPC: Study on Size Effect and on the Local Bond Stress-Slip Law,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 133, No. 2, 2007, pp. 225-234. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:2(225)

6. Cairns, J., and Jones, K., “Influence of Rib Geometry on Strength of Lapped Joints: An Experimental and Analytical Study,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 47, No. 172, 1995, pp. 253-262. doi: 10.1680/macr.1995.47.172.253

7. Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 408, “Guide for Lap Splice and Development Length of High Relative Rib Area Reinforcing Bars in Tension and Commentary (ACI 408.3R-09),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2009, 8 pp.

8. Darwin, D., and Graham, E. K., “Effect of Deformation Height and Spacing on Bond Strength of Reinforcing Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 90, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1993, pp. 646-657.

9. ACI Committee 440, “Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars (ACI 440.1R-15),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2015, 88 pp.

10. Irshidat, M. R., “Improved Bond Behavior between FRP Reinforcing Bars and Concrete with Carbon Nanotubes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 257, 2020, Article No. 119562. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119562

11. Silva, M. A. G.; Biscaia, H.; and Chastre, C., “Influence of Temperature Cycles on Bond between Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer and Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2013, pp. 977-987.

12. Tighiouart, B.; Benmokrane, B.; and Mukhopadhyaya, P., “Bond Strength of Glass FRP Rebar Splices in Beams under Static Loading,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 13, No. 7, 1999, pp. 383-392. doi: 10.1016/S0950-0618(99)00037-9

13. Harajli, M., and Abouniaj, M., “Bond Performance of GFRP Bars in Tension: Experimental Evaluation and Assessment of ACI 440 Guidelines,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 14, No. 6, 2010, pp. 659-668. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000139

14. Tekle, B. H.; Khennane, A.; and Kayali, O., “Bond Properties of Sand-Coated GFRP Bars with Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 20, No. 5, 2016, p. 04016025. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000685

15. ASTM C39/C39M-18, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, 8 pp.

16. ASTM D7205/D7205M-06(2016), “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 13 pp.

17. Choi, O. C.; Hadje-Ghaffari, H.; Darwin, D.; and McCabe, S. L., “Bond of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcement to Concrete: Bar Parameters,” SL Report 90-1, University of Kansas Transportation Center, Lawrence, KS, 1990, 45 pp.

18. ACI Committee 440, “Guide Test Methods for Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Reinforcing or Strengthening Concrete and Masonry Structures (ACI 440.3R-12),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 23 pp.

19. Tepfers, R., “Cracking of Concrete Cover along Anchored Deformed Reinforcing Bars,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 31, No. 106, 1979, pp. 3-12. doi: 10.1680/macr.1979.31.106.3

20. Desnerck, P.; Lees, J. M.; and Morley, C. T., “Bond Behaviour of Reinforcing Bars in Cracked Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 94, 2015, pp. 126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.043

21. Zhang, X.; Dong, W.; Lv, C.; Yang, M.; and Ou, J., “Analytical Approach to Modeling the Effect of Transverse Reinforcements on the Bond Strength of Deformed Bars,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 145, No. 6, 2019, p. 04019046. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002293

22. Ferreira, T., and Rasband, W., ImageJ User Guide, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 2012, 198 pp.

23. ASME B46.1-2002, “Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness, and Lay),” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, 2002.

24. Hwang, H.-J.; Park, H.-G.; and Yi, W.-J., “Nonuniform Bond Stress Distribution Model for Evaluation of Bar Development Length,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 4, July-Aug. 2017, pp. 839-849. doi: 10.14359/51689446

25. Lutz, L. A., and Gergely, P., “Mechanics of Bond and Slip of Deformed Bars in Concrete,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 64, No. 11, Nov. 1967, pp. 711-721.

26. Alazemi, A. A.; Ghosh, A.; Sadeghi, F.; and Stacke, L.-E., “Experimental Investigation of the Correlation between Adhesion and Friction Forces,” Tribology Letters, V. 62, No. 2, 2016, Article No. 30. doi: 10.1007/s11249-016-0679-6

27. Kim, M.-J.; Kim, H.-G.; Lee, J.-M.; Lee, Y.-J.; and Kim, K.-H., “A Prediction Model for Bond Deterioration in RC Members. I: Bond Stress-Slip Behavior for Splitting Failure,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 144, No. 3, 2018, p. 04018002. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001966

28. Talaat, M., and Mosalam, K. M., “On Bond Failure by Splitting of Concrete Cover Surrounding Anchored Bars,” Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures (FraMCoS-6), Catania, Italy, 2007, 8 pp.

29. Wu, C., and Chen, G., “Unified Model of Local Bond between Deformed Steel Rebar and Concrete: Indentation Analogy Theory and Validation,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V. 141, No. 10, 2015, p. 04015038. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000945

30. Basaran, B., and Kalkan, I., “Development Length and Bond Strength Equations for FRP Bars Embedded in Concrete,” Composite Structures, V. 251, 2020, Article No. 112662. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112662

31. Chase, W., and Bown, F., General Statistics, third edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1997.

32. Suh, N. P., Complexity: Theory and Applications, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2005.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer