Title:
Development Length of GFRP Rebars in Reinforced Concrete Members under Flexure
Author(s):
Alvaro Ruiz Emparanza, Francisco De Caso, and Antonio Nanni
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
356
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
61-71
Keywords:
GFRP; bond; development length; composites; flexure; sustainability
DOI:
10.14359/51737247
Date:
10/1/2022
Abstract:
In reinforced concrete (RC) structures, a proper bond between the reinforcement and the concrete is key for appropriate composite action. To date, limited studies exist that evaluate the bond of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars in concrete members under flexure and its effect on the development length required to ensure a full stress transfer. In this paper, the bond strength developed by glass FRP (GFRP) and steel rebars is evaluated and compared by testing 16 RC beams under three-point bending. The beams were 1.83 m long and had a section of 150 x 360 mm. Different embedment lengths were evaluated as a function of the bar diameter (db): 30 db, 40 db, and 50 db for GFRP reinforced specimens, and 20 db, and 30 db for steel reinforced beams. Two different GFRP rebar types (six beams for each) and conventional steel (four beams) were used as reinforcement; all the rebars had a nominal diameter of 12.7 mm. Based on the results presented herein, GFRP rebars have a lower bond capacity than steel rebars. Also, the development lengths as suggested by actual code provisions for GFRP rebars (ACI 440.1R-15) appear to be over-conservative: the theoretical development length values were around 110% - 188% higher than the experimental results for the tested GFRP rebars, while the predicted development length for steel rebars according to ACI 318 was about 83% higher than the experimental results.
Related References:
1. Nanni, A., De Luca, A., & Zadeh, H. (2014). Reinforced Concrete with FRP Bars. doi: 10.1201/b16669
2. Ruiz Emparanza, A., Kampmann, R., & De Caso Y Basalo, F. (2017). State-of-the-Practice of Global Manufacturing of FRP Rebar and Specifications. ACI Fall Convention. Anaheim, California.
3. Ruiz Emparanza, A., De Caso Y Basalo, F., Kampmann, R., & Adarraga Usabiaga, I. (2018). Evaluation of the Bond-To-Concrete Properties of GFRP Rebars in Marine Environments. Infrastructures, 3(4), 44.
4. Okelo, R., & Yuan, R. L. (2005). Bond Strength of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Rebars in Normal Strength Concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction, 9(3), 203–213.
5. Yan F, Lin Z, Yang M. (2016). Bond mechanism and bond strength of GFRP bars to concrete: A review. Compos Part B Eng, 98, 56–69.
6. Islam S, Afefy HM, Sennah KS, et al. Bond characteristics of straight- and headed-end, ribbed-surface, GFRP bars embedded in high-strength concrete. Constr Build Mater, 83, 283–298.
7. Tekle, B. H., Khennane, A., & Kayali, O. (2017). Bond of spliced GFRP reinforcement bars in alkali activated cement concrete. Engineering Structures, 147, 740–751.
8. Esfahani, M. R., Rakhshanimehr, M., & Mousavi, S. R. (2013). Bond Strength of Lap-Spliced GFRP bars in concrete beams. Journal of Composites for Construction, 17(3), 314–323.
9. Wambeke, B. W., & Shield, C. K. (2006). Development Length of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars in Concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 103(1), 11.
10. Orangun, C. O., Jirsa, J. O., & Breen, J. E. (1975). The Strength of Anchored Bars: a Reevaluation of Test Data on Development Length and Splices. Center for Highway Research, University of Texas at Austin.
11. Tassinari, A., Ruiz Emparanza, A., Nanni, A., De Caso y Basalo, F., Palacios, J. M., & Mazzotti, C. (2019). Bond Behaviour of GFRP Rebars in Reinforced Concrete Members under Flexure. Fiber Reinforced Polymer for Reinforced Concrete Structures - FRPRCS 14. Belfast.
12. Ashour, S. A. (2000). Effect of Compressive Strength and Tensile Reinforcement Ratio on Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Beams. Engineering Structures, 22(5), 413–423.