Title:
Numerical Investigation on Mechanical Splices for GFRP Reinforcing Bars
Author(s):
Nafiseh Kiani, Steven Nolan, and Antonio Nanni
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
356
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
36-45
Keywords:
GFRP bars; mechanical splice; swaged coupler; finite element model
DOI:
10.14359/51737244
Date:
10/1/2022
Abstract:
A common challenge in reinforced concrete construction is the need to connect bars of finite length to provide reinforcement continuity. Lap and mechanical splices are common methods that have been used to make continuous reinforcement. Lap splicing may cause additional congestion making concrete consolidation difficult. Mechanical splices are used when lap splicing is not practical. Different types of mechanical splices are commercially available for steel bars. For the case of GFRP reinforcement, mechanical splices are very useful in staged construction because the reinforcement cannot either be bent at the site or there is insufficient space for lap splicing. Mechanical splices for GFRP bars, however, must account for the low transverse stiffness and strength of the bars. For these reasons, only certain mechanical splices are practical for GFRP bars and careful consideration must be given to their installation and effectiveness. In this study, a commercially available swaged coupler was selected to investigate the behavior of spliced GFRP bars. Expected performance was numerically evaluated using a Finite Element (FE) model to develop a framework for test validation. The FE model was calibrated with a laboratory test to compare the results. The coupler’s length, the bar’s tensile strength, and the slip between the coupler and the bar were investigated. The outcome of this study allows for the definition of an efficient test campaign.
Related References:
1. Hansson, C. M. “The impact of corrosion on society,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, V. 42, No. 10, 2011, pp. 2952–62.
2. Ghiasian, M., Rossini, M., Amendolara, J., Haus, B., Nolan, S., Nanni, A., Bel Had Ali, N., and Rhode-Barbarigos, L. “Test-driven design of an efficient and sustainable seawall structure,” Coastal Structures 2019, 2019, pp. 1222–7.
3. Cadenazzi, T., Dotelli, G., Rossini, M., Nolan, S., and Nanni, A. “Cost and environmental analyses of reinforcement alternatives for a concrete bridge,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, V. 0, No. 0, 2019, pp. 1–16.
4. Elnemr, A., Ahmed, E., Barris, C., and Benmokrane, B. “Bond-dependent coefficient of glass- and carbon-FRP bars in normal- and high-strength concretes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 113, 2016, pp. 77–89.
5. Rolland, A., Quiertant, M., Khadour, A., Chataigner, S., Benzarti, K., and Argoul, P. “Experimental investigations on the bond behavior between concrete and FRP reinforcing bars,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 173, 2018, pp. 136–48.
6. Tabatabaei, A., Eslami, A., Mohamed, H. M., and Benmokrane, B. “Strength of compression lap-spliced GFRP bars in concrete columns with different splice lengths,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 182, 2018, pp. 657–69.
7. Zhang, B., Zhu, H., Wu, G., Wang, Q., and Li, T. “Improvement of bond performance between concrete and CFRP bars with optimized additional aluminum ribs anchorage,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 241, No. January, 2020, p. 118012.
8. Farhangi, V., and Karakouzian, M. “Effect of fiber reinforced polymer tubes filled with recycled materials and concrete on structural capacity of pile foundations,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), V. 10, No. 5, 2020.
9. Aly, R., Benmokrane, B., and Ebead, U. “Tensile lap splicing of fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcing bars in concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 6, 2006, pp. 857–64.
10. ACI Committee 318. “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19),” American Concrete Institute, 2019.
11. Khedmatgozar Dolati, S. S., and Mehrabi, A. “Review of available systems and materials for splicing prestressed-precast concrete piles,” Structures, V. 30, 2021, pp. 850–65.
12. Jansson, P. O. “Evaluation of Grout-Filled Mechanical Splices for Precast Concrete Construction,” Michigan Department of Transportation, 2008.
13. ACI Committee 439. “Types of Mechanical Splices for Reinforcing Bars (ACI 439.3R-07),” American Concrete Institute, 2007, p. 20.
14. Haber, Z. B., Saiid Saiidi, M., and Sanders, D. H. “Behavior and simplified modeling of mechanical reinforcing bar splices,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 2, 2015, pp. 179–88.
15. Valikhani, A., Jahromi, A. J., Mantawy, I. M., and Azizinamini, A. “Effect of mechanical connectors on interface shear strength between concrete substrates and UHPC: Experimental and numerical studies and proposed design equation,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 267, 2021, p. 120587.
16. Jordan, E. J., and Saiidi, M. “Experimental Studies of Reinforcing Steel and Shape Memory Alloys in Mechanically Spliced Connections for Seismic Application,” MSc Thesis, 2018.
17. AASHTO. “AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011.
18. Tazarv, M., and Saiidi, M. S. “Seismic design of bridge columns incorporating mechanical bar splices in plastic hinge regions,” Engineering Structures, V. 124, 2016, pp. 507–20.
19. International Code Council Evaluation Service (ICC-ES). “Acceptance Criteria for Mechanical Connector Systems for Steel Reinforcing Bars (AC133),” 2010.
20. ACI Committee 439. “Types of Mechanical Splices for Reinforcing Bars (ACI 439.3R-07),” Farmington Hills, MI, 2007.
21. ASTM A1034. “Standard Test Methods for Testing Mechanical Splices for Steel Reinforcing Bars (ASTM A1034),” ASTM International, 2015.
22. California Test 670. “Method of Tests for Mechanical and Welded Reinforcing Steel Splices,” California Department of Transportation, 2011.
23. ASTM A370. “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products (A370),” ASTM International, 2020.
24. ACI Committee 440. “Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars (ACI 440.1R-15),” American Concrete Institute, 2015.
25. AASHTO. “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Guide Specifications for GFRP-Reinforced Concrete, Second Edition,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2018.
26. Kiani, N., Rossini, M., and Nanni, A. “Characterization of GFRP bars and couplers for prestressed concrete,” Composites and Advanced Materials Expo, CAMX 2020, 2020
27. Wypych, G. “Handbok of Polymers,” ChemTec Publishing, 2012.
28. Stockton, S. L. “Engineering and Design: Composite Materials for Civil Engineering Structures,” Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1997.
29. Abedin, M., Maleki, S., Kiani, N., and Shahrokhinasab, E. “Shear Lag Effects in Angles Welded at Both Legs,” Advances in Civil Engineering, V. 2019, 2019, p. 8041767.
30. ASTM D7205/D7205M. “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars,” ASTM International, 2021.
31. ASTM D7957/D7957M. “Standard Specification for Solid Round Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, 2017.