Title:
Life Prediction of Concrete Mixed with Nano-CaCO3 in Semi-Immersed Corrosive Environment
Author(s):
T. Hakuzweyezu, H. Qiao, C. Lu, J. Twagirumukiza, and B. Yang
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
119
Issue:
5
Appears on pages(s):
51-62
Keywords:
Birnbaum-Saunders (B-S); durability; life prediction; nano- CaCO3; reliability; sulfate attack
DOI:
10.14359/51735973
Date:
9/1/2022
Abstract:
External sulfate attack (“sulfate attack” hereafter) is one of the
most important factors that influences the long-term durability
of concrete structures when exposed to aggressive environments. Concrete can expand, crack, and lose strength as a result of sulfate attack. This paper presents the results from an experimental investigation on nano-CaCO3-modified concrete under sulfate attack. The specimens were exposed to a partially submerged condition in 10% Na2SO4 solution. The mechanical and durability performance were evaluated based on durability evaluation parameters. Eventually, the Birnbaum-Saunders (B-S) life prediction model was used to assess the long-term performance of the tested mixtures. The results show that when the content of nano-CaCO3 is 1%, the resistance of concrete to sulfate attack is greatly increased, and the service life of concrete structures is increased significantly. Moreover,
using a reliability approach, the proposed model can effectively
describe the degradation process of concrete under sulfate attack.
Related References:
1. Qiao, H.; Ndahirwa, D.; Li, Y.; and Liang, J., “The Use of Basalt Rock Powder and Superfine Sand as Supplementary Cementitious Materials for Friendly Environmental Cement Mortar,” Research Application Materials Science, V. 1, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1-9. doi: 10.33142/msra.v1i1.665
2. Harrison, A. J. W., “Tececo Eco-Cement Masonry Product Update – Carbonation = Sequestration,” 10th Canadian Masonry Symposium, V. 32, 2005, 9 pp.
3. Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, K.; and Wang, B., “Neutralization Performance and Prediction Model of Lining Shotcrete on Alternation Effects of Nitric Acid and Carbonation,” Materials Reports, V. 8, No. 34, 2020, pp. 8058-8063. doi: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2016.11.013
4. Smith, J. L., and Virmani, Y. P., “Materials and Methods for Corrosion Control of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Structures in New Construction,” FHWA-RD-00-081, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 82 pp.
5. Niu, D.; Zhang, L.; Fu, Q.; Wen, B.; and Luo, D., “Critical Conditions and Life Prediction of Reinforcement Corrosion in Coral Aggregate Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 238, 2020, p. 117685. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117685
6. Gong, W.; Yu, H.; Ma, H.; Qiao, H.; and Chen, G., “Study on Corrosion and Anticorrosion of Rebar in Magnesium Oxychloride Cement Concrete,” Emerging Materials Research, V. 8, No. 1, 2019, pp. 94-104. doi: 10.1680/jemmr.18.00012
7. Liu, Q.; Chen, B.; and Li, Y., “Corrosion Investigation of Reinforced Concrete under Qinghai Salt Lake Environment by EIS,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, V. 11, No. 12, 2016, pp. 10238-10245. doi: 10.20964/2016.12.36
8. Yu, H.; Li, J. M.; and Xin, H., “Study on Corrosion Resistant Performance of Sulfoaluminate Cement,” Advanced Materials Research, V. 710, 2013, pp. 362-366. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.710.362.
9. Tumidajski, P. J., and Chan, G. W., “Durability of High Performance Concrete in Magnesium Brine,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 26, No. 4, 1996, pp. 557-565. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(96)00034-8
10. Li, K.; Wei, Z.; Qiao, H.; Lu, C.; and Theogene, H., “PCM-Concrete Interfacial Tensile Behavior Using Nano-SiO2 Based on Splitting-Tensile Test,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 19, 2021, pp. 321-334. doi: 10.3151/jact.19.321
11. Wu, Z.; Shi, C.; Khayat, K. H.; and Wan, S., “Effects of Different Nanomaterials on Hardening and Performance of Ultra-High Strength Concrete (UHSC),” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 70, 2016, pp. 24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.03.003
12. Shah, S. P.; Hou, P.; and Konsta-Gdoutos, M. S., “Nano-Modification of Cementitious Material: Toward a Stronger and Durable Concrete,” Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, V. 5, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1-22. doi: 10.1080/21650373.2015.1086286
13. Wang, X., “Effects of Nanoparticles on the Properties of Cement-Based Materials,” PhD dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 2017, 181 pp.
14. Du, S.; Wu, J.; Alshareedah, O.; and Shi, X., “Nanotechnology in Cement-Based Materials: A Review of Durability, Modeling, and Advanced Characterization,” Nanomaterials, V. 9, No. 9, 2019, p. 1213. doi: 10.3390/nano9091213
15. Aggarwal, P.; Singh, R. P.; and Aggarwal, Y., “Use of Nano-Silica in Cement Based Materials—A Review,” Cogent Engineering, V. 2, No. 1, 2015, p. 1078018. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2015.1078018
16. Norhasri, M. S. M.; Hamidah, M. S.; and Fadzil, A. M., “Applications of Using Nano Material in Concrete: A review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 133, 2017, pp. 91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.005
17. Chen, X. L.; Liu, A.; and Wang, X., “Effect of Nano-CaCO3 on Properties of Cement Paste,” Energy Procedia, V. 16, Part B, 2012, pp. 991-996. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.158
18. Cao, M.; Ming, X.; He, K.; Li, L.; and Shen, S., “Effect of Macro-, Micro- and Nano-Calcium Carbonate on Properties of Cementitious Composites—A Review,” Materials (Basel), V. 12, No. 5, 2019, p. 781. doi: 10.3390/ma12050781
19. Said, A. M.; Zeidan, M. S.; Bassuoni, M. T.; and Tian, Y., “Properties of Concrete Incorporating Nano-Silica,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 36, 2012, pp. 838-844. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.044
20. Tobón, J. I.; Payá, J.; and Restrepo, O. J., “Study of Durability of Portland Cement Mortars Blended with Silica Nanoparticles,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 80, 2015, pp. 92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.074
21. Singh, L. P.; Karade, S. R.; Bhattacharyya, S. K.; Yousuf, M. M.; and Ahalawat, S., “Beneficial Role of Nanosilica in Cement Based Materials—A review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 47, 2013, pp. 1069-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.052
22. Arel, H. Ş., and Thomas, B. S., “The Effects of Nano- and Micro-Particle Additives on the Durability and Mechanical Properties of Mortars Exposed to Internal and External Sulfate Attacks,” Results in Physics, V. 7, 2017, pp. 843-851. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.02.009
23. Fan, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Q.; and Shah, S. P., “The Effects of Nano-Calcined Kaolinite Clay on Cement Mortar Exposed to Acid Deposits,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 102, 2016, pp. 486-495. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.016
24. Jindong, Z., “Research on Corrosion Resistance of Semi-Buried Concrete in Saline Soil Area,” Chang’an University, Xi’an, China, 2013.
25. Maohua, Z., and Xuecheng, L., “Sulfate Erosion Resistance of Nano-Based Concrete under Freeze-Thaw Environment,” Ziran Zaihai Xuebao, V. 27, No. 2, 2018, pp. 94-99.
26. Darmawan, M. S., and Stewart, M. G., “Spatial Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis of Corroding Pretensioned Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders,” Structural Safety, V. 29, No. 1, 2007, pp. 16-31. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.11.002
27. Zhang, J. R., and Qin, Q., “Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis of Existing Concrete Bridges,” Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mech, V. 22, No. 4, 2005, pp. 90-95.
28. Xu, G. G.; Gu, S. C.; Wang, X. D.; Wang, H.; and Zhu, S.-B., “Grouting to Prevent Sulfate Corrosion on Coal Mine Shaft,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 25, No. 11, 2021, pp. 4133-4143. doi: 10.1007/s12205-021-1761-7
29. Al Ghabban, A.; Al Zubaidi, A. B.; Jafar, M.; and Fakhri, Z., “Effect of Nano SiO2 and Nano CaCO3 on the Mechanical Properties, Durability and Flowability of Concrete,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science Engineering, V. 454, No. 1, 2018, 10 pp. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/454/1/012016
30. Jawad, Z. F.; Salman, A. J.; Ghayyib, R. J.; and Hawas, M. N., “Investigation the Effect of Different Nano Materials on the Compressive Strength of Cement Mortar,” AIP Conference Proceedings, V. 2213, Mar. 2020, p. 020190. doi: 10.1063/5.0000164
31. Van Belleghem, B.; Van den Heede, P.; Van Tittelboom, K.; and De Belie, N. D., “Quantification of the Service Life Extension and Environmental Benefit of Chloride Exposed Self-Healing Concrete,” Materials (Basel), V. 10, No. 1, 2016, p. 5. doi: 10.3390/ma10010005
32. Pack, S. W.; Jung, M. S.; Kang, J. W.; Ann, K. Y.; and Kim, J., “Assessment of Durability of Concrete Structure Subject to Carbonation with Application of Safety Factor,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, V. 2018, 2018, pp. 1-10. doi: 10.1155/2018/2430630
33. Grasley, Z., “Modeling Sulfate Attack in Modern Concrete for Building Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure Modeling Sulfate Attack in Modern Concrete for Building Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure,” Transportation Consortium of South-Central States Project No. 17CTAM01, 2018, https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/transet_data/9. (last accessed Sept. 12, 2022)
34. Hodhod, O., and Salama, G. A., “Analysis of Sulfate Resistance in Concrete Based on Artificial Neural Networks and USBR4908-Modeling,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, V. 4, No. 4, 2013, pp. 651-660. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2013.02.007
35. Sarkar, S.; Mahadevan, S.; Meeussen, J. C. L.; van der Sloot, H.; and Kosson, D. S., “Numerical Simulation of Cementitious Materials Degradation Under External Sulfate Attack,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 32, No. 3, 2010, pp. 241-252. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.12.005
36. Lv, H.; Chen, J.; and Lu, C., “A Statistical Evolution Model of Concrete Damage Induced by Seawater Corrosion,” Materials (Basel), V. 14, No. 4, 2021, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.3390/ma14041007
37. Kwon, K.; Jung, H.; and Park, J.-W., “Service-Life Prediction of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Subsurface Environment,” Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology, V. 14, No. 1, 2016, pp. 11-19. doi: 10.7733/jnfcwt.2016.14.1.11
38. Qiao, H.; B. Zhu; Lu, C.; Feng, Q.; Zhou, M.; and Cao, H., “Accelerated Life Test of Concrete Based on Wiener Stochastic Process,” Jianzhu Cailiao Xuebao/Journal of Building Materials, V. 19, No. 6, 2016. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2016.06.012
39. Li, K.; Duan, Y.; Huang, S.; Zheng, S.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Y.; and Zhou, C., “Residual Electrical Life Prediction of AC Contactor Based on the Wiener Process,” Proceedings of the Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering, V. 38, No. 13, 2019, pp. 3978-3986. doi: 10.13334/J.0258-8013.PCSEE.170547
40. Wang, P. H.; Qiao, H. X.; Feng, Q.; and Cao, H., “Life Prediction of Coated Steel with Individual Difference in Magnesium Oxychloride Cement Concrete,” Engineering and Science, V. 53, No. 12, 2019, pp. 2309-2316. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2019.12.007
41. Leiva, V.; Ruggeri, F.; Saulo, H.; and Vivanco, J. F., “A Methodology Based on the Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution for Reliability Analysis Applied to Nano-Materials,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, V. 157, 2017, pp. 192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.024
42. Barriga, G. D. C.; Dey, D. K.; Cancho, V. G.; and Suzuki, A. K., “Bayesian Analysis of Birnbaum-Saunders Survival Model with Cure Fraction Under a Variety of Activation Mechanism,” Model Assisted Statistics and Applications: An International Journal, V. 15, No. 1, 2020, pp. 35-51. doi: 10.3233/MAS-190477
43. Alam, F. M. A., and Nassar, M., “On Modeling Concrete Compressive Strength Data Using Laplace Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution Assuming Contaminated Information,” Crystals, V. 11, No. 7, 2021, p. 830. doi: 10.3390/cryst11070830
44. Balakrishnan, N., and D. Kundu, “Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution: A Review of Models, Analysis and Applications,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, V. 35, No. 1, 2018, pp. 4-49.
45. Sánchez, L.; Leiva, V.; Galea, M.; and Saulo, H., “Birnbaum-Saunders Quantile Regression and Its Diagnostics with Application to Economic Data,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, V. 37, No. 1, 2021, pp. 53-73. doi: 10.1002/asmb.2556
46. Oliveira, K. L. P.; Castro, B. S.; Saulo, H.; and Vila, R., “On a Length-Biased Birnbaum-Saunders Regression Model Applied to Meteorological Data,” pp. 1-24, 2020, http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.10760. (last accessed Sept. 7, 2022)
47. Mazucheli, J.; Leiva, V.; Alves, B.; and Menezes, A. F. B., “A New Quantile Regression for Modeling Bounded Data Under a Unit Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution with Applications in Medicine and Politics,” Symmetry, V. 13, No. 4, 2021, p. 682. doi: 10.3390/sym13040682
48. Van Tittelboom, K.; De Belie, N.; and Hooton, R. D., “Test Methods for Resistance of Concrete to Sulfate Attack—A Critical Review,” Performance of Cement-Based Materials in Aggressive Aqueous Environments, V. 10, 2013, pp. 251-288.
49. Haufe, J.; Vollpracht, A.; and Matschei, T., “Performance Test for Sulfate Resistance of Concrete by Tensile Strength Measurements: Determination of Test Criteria,” Crystals, V. 11, No. 9, 2021, pp. 1-20. doi: 10.3390/cryst11091018
50. Wu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, Y.; She, W.; Yang, L.; and Liu, G., “A Comparable Study on the Deterioration of Limestone Powder Blended Cement Under Sodium Sulfate and Magnesium Sulfate Attack at a Low Temperature,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 243, 2020, p. 118279. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118279
51. GB/T 50082-2009, “Standard for Test Methods of Long-Term Performance and Durability of Ordinary Concrete,” Beijing, China, 2009.
52. Qiao, H., “Evaluation Method for Durability of Concrete Against Sulfate Attack,” College of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, China, 2007.
53. Aykroyd, R. G.; Leiva, V.; and Marchant, C., “Multivariate Birnbaum-Saunders Distributions: Modelling and Applications,” Risks, V. 6, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1-25. doi: 10.3390/risks6010021
54. Gao, P., and Xie, L., “Reliability-Based Analytic Models for Fatigue Lifetime Distribution Estimation of Series Mechanical Systems Under Random Load Considering Strength Degradation Path Dependence,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, V. 2017, 2017, pp. 1-15. doi: 10.1155/2017/5291086
55. Xu, D.; He, J.; and Yang, Z., “Reliability Prediction Based on Birnbaum–Saunders Model and its Application to Smart Meter,” Annals of Operations Research, No. 0123456789, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s10479-019-03429-2