Statewide Survey of Chemically Stabilized Soil Properties for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Statewide Survey of Chemically Stabilized Soil Properties for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design

Author(s): A. S. Carey, L. A. Cooley Jr., A. Middleton, W. G. Sullivan, L. E. W. Ayers, and I. L. Howard

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 119

Issue: 5

Appears on pages(s): 227-238

Keywords: cement stabilization; chemically stabilized soil; in-place properties; lime-fly ash stabilization; lime stabilization; mechanistic-empirical pavement design

DOI: 10.14359/51735957

Date: 9/1/2022

Abstract:
Over 450 cores were extracted from roadways throughout Mississippi to provide a realistic picture of mechanical properties in later-age chemically stabilized soil. Cores ranged from 10 to 54 years old and were stabilized with either lime-fly ash, cement, or lime. Indirect tensile strength (IDT), unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and elastic modulus (E) tests were used to quantify mechanical properties. Generally speaking, IDT, UCS, and E values tended not to exceed 250, 1500, and 1,500,000 psi (1724 kPa, 10,342 kPa, and 10,342 MPa), respectively, in pavements over 10 years old. Cores were also compared to mechanical property relationships found in the 1993 AASHTO design guide and the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) and the literature to determine their applicability to later-age pavement properties. Relationships from the literature comparing IDT to UCS were generally good predictors of later-age property relationships; however, relationships between E and UCS were not good predictors of later-age strength as most equations did not account for the decrease in E development over time when compared to UCS.

Related References:

1. Howard, I. L.; Sullivan, W. G.; Anderson, B. K.; Shannon, J.; and Cost, T., “Design and Construction Control Guidance for Chemically Stabilized Pavement Base Layers,” Report No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-13-206, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Jackson, MS, 2013, 182 pp.

2. Saxena, P.; Tompkins, D.; Khazanovich, L.; and Balbo, J. T., “Evaluation of Characterization and Performance Modeling of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 2186, No. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 111-119. doi: 10.3141/2186-12

3. Sullivan, W. G., “Field Application of the PM Device and Assessment of Early Age Behaviors of Cement Stabilized Pavement Layers,” PhD dissertation, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 2021, 219 pp.

4. IHRB, “Soil-Cement Stabilization – Part 1: Materials and Construction,” Project HR-75, Iowa Highway Research Board, Ames, IA, 1962, 98 pp.

5. Roberts, S. E., and Schoeneman, E. P., “Soil-Cement Construction Using Loess Soil,” Highway Research Record, V. 86, 1965, pp. 62-72.

6. Hadley, W. O., “Material Characterization and Inherent Variation Analysis of Soil-Cement Field Cores,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1295, 1991, pp. 23-36.

7. White, D. J., and Bergeson, K. L., “Long-Term Strength and Durability of Hydrated Fly-Ash Road Bases,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 1755, No. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 151-159.

8. Barstis, W. F., “Long-Term Effect of Lime-Fly Ash Treated Soils,” Report No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-03-147, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Jackson, MS, 2003, 348 pp.

9. George, K. P., “Soil Stabilization Field Trial,” Report No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-05-133, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Jackson, MS, 2005, 79 pp.

10. Wilson, P. L., “Effectiveness of Lime Stabilisation on Reactive Soils for Main Roads,” bachelor’s dissertation, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia, 2011, 102 pp.

11. Varner, R. L., “Variability of Cement-Treated Layers in MDOT Road Projects,” Report No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-11-227, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Jackson, MS, 2011, 225 pp.

12. Sullivan, W. G., and Howard, I. L., “Case Study of Interstate 269 Corridor through Mississippi Focusing on Chemically Stabilized Pavement Layers,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 2673, No. 5, May 2019, pp. 374-388. doi: 10.1177/0361198119836773

13. Highway Research Board, “The AASHO Road Test: Report 7 – Summary Report,” Special Report 61G, Publication No. 1061, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1962, 66 pp.

14. Van Til, C. J.; McCullough, B. F.; Vallerga, B. A.; and Hicks, R. G., “Evaluation of AASHO Interim Guides for Design of Pavement Structures,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 128, Highway Research Board, Washington, DC, 1972, 124 pp.

15. AASHTO, “AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 1986.

16. AASHTO, “AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 1993.

17. Coree, B., and White, T. D., “Layer Coefficients in Terms of Performance and Mixture Characteristics,” Report No. FHWA/IN/JHRP-88/13, Indiana Department of Transportation, Indianapolis, IN, 1988, 117 pp.

18. Christopher, B. R.; Schwartz, C.; and Boudreau, R., “Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements,” Report No. FHWA NHI-05-037, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 2006, 598 pp.

19. Timm, D. H.; Robbins, M. M.; Tran, N.; and Rodezno, C., “Flexible Pavement Design – State of the Practice,” NCAT Report 14-04, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL, 2014, 45 pp.

20. AASHTO, “Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: A Manual of Practice,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2008, 218 pp.

21. Thompson, M. R., “Mechanistic Design Concepts for Stabilized Base Pavements,” Report No. FHWA-IL-UI-214, Engineering Experiment Station, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 1986, 52 pp.

22. Thompson, M. R., “High-Strength Stabilized Base Thickness Design Procedure,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1440, 1994, pp. 1-7.

23. Beeghly, J. H., “Recent Experiences with Lime – Fly Ash Stabilization of Pavement Subgrade Soils, Base, and Recycled Asphalt,” Paper No. 46, 2003 International Ash Utilization Symposium, Lexington, KY, 2003, pp. 1-18.

24. Barišić, I.; Dimter, S.; and Rukavina, T., “Strength Properties of Steel Slag Stabilized Mixes,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 58, Mar. 2014, pp. 386-391. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.002

25. Solanki, P., and Zaman, M., “Behavior of Stabilized Subgrade Soils under Indirect Tension and Flexure,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 26, No. 5, May 2014, pp. 833-844. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000870

26. Wen, H.; Muhunthan, B.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Edil, T.; and Tinjum, J. M., “Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 789, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2014, 72 pp.

27. Howard, I. L., and Cox, B. C., “Multiyear Laboratory and Field Performance Assessment of High-Traffic US-49 Full-Depth Reclamation,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 2573, No. 1, Jan. 2016, pp. 86-97. doi: 10.3141/2573-11

28. Kennedy, T. W.; Moore, R. K.; and Anagnos, J. N., “Estimations of Indirect Tensile Strengths for Cement-Treated Materials,” Highway Research Record, No. 351, 1971, pp. 112-114.

29. Kennedy, T. W., and Moore, R. K., “Estimations of Indirect Tensile Strengths for Lime-Treated Materials,” Highway Research Record, No. 351, 1971, pp. 66-77.

30. Doshi, S. N., and Guirguis, H. R., “Statistical Relations Between Compressive and Tensile Strengths of Soil-Cement,” Australian Road Research, V. 13, No. 3, 1983, pp. 195-200.

31. Hall, M., “Cement-Stabilized Open-Graded Base Strength Testing and Field Performance Versus Cement Content,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1440, 1994, pp. 22-31.

32. Gnanendran, C. T., and Piratheepan, J., “Determination of Fatigue Life of a Granular Base Material Lightly Stabilized with Slag Lime from Indirect Diametral Tensile Testing,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, V. 136, No. 8, Aug. 2010, pp. 736-745. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000138

33. Scullion, T.; Sebesta, S.; Estakhri, C.; Harris, P.; Shon, C.-S.; Harvey, O.; and Rose-Harvey, K., “Full-Depth Reclamation: New Test Procedures and Recommended Updates to Specifications,” Report No. FHWA/TX-11/0-6271-2, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX, 2012, 104 pp.

34. Rashidi, M.; Ashtiani, R. S.; Si, J.; Izzo, R. P.; and McDaniel, M., “A Practical Approach for the Estimation of Strength and Resilient Properties of Cementitious Materials,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 2672, No. 52, Dec. 2018, pp. 152-163. doi: 10.1177/0361198118769900

35. James, R. S.; Cooley, L. A. Jr.; and Ahlrich, R. C., “Chemically Stabilized Soils,” Report No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-09-205, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Jackson, MS, 2009, 408 pp.

36. Sullivan, W. G.; Howard, I. L.; and Anderson, B. K., “Development of Equipment for Compacting Soil-Cement into Plastic Molds for Design and Quality Control Purposes,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 2511, No. 1, Jan. 2015, pp. 102-111. doi: 10.3141/2511-12

37. Hansen, B. S.; Carey, A. S.; and Howard, I. L., “Effects of Aggregate Shape and Mineralogy on Relationships between Concrete Mechanical Properties,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 118, No. 5, Sept. 2021, pp. 115-124.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer