Title:
Evaluation of Live Load Distribution Factors for Aging Prestressed Concrete Bridges
Author(s):
He Zhang, Peng Lou, and Hani Nassif
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
352
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
36-50
Keywords:
prestressed concrete; bridge design, finite element modeling, distribution factors, diagnostic load test
DOI:
10.14359/51734855
Date:
5/31/2022
Abstract:
Since the early 1950s when prestressed concrete (PSC) bridge design was first started, major changes to the design provisions have been made. This paper aims to evaluate the historical design provisions in terms of design capacities and load distribution. Seventeen existing bridges designed using the first PSC Criteria are evaluated. Additionally, a load test is performed on one sixty-year-old PSC I-girder bridge to help validate finite element models (FEM) developed for determining the load distribution factors. The verification of the model is conducted based on the results from the diagnostic load testing and the nondestructive tests. Since the load tests may not be at the governing location, the critical live load distribution factors are determined using the verified FEM by changing the transverse positions of trucks. The results of design capacity show that the overall performance of the flexural design is more consistent than that of the shear, and in some cases, the shear could be unsatisfactory. The same set of bridges are analyzed for the distribution factors using the FEM method, and the results are compared with the four historically available prediction models. The comparison shows that all four approaches provide reasonable estimation of the distribution factors, while the AASHTO Standard Specification underestimates the live load distribution for shear.
Related References:
AASHTOWare. 2021. AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating BrDR version 7.0. Washington, D.C.
ABAQUS. 2014. Abaqus user’s manual, version 6.14. Providence, RI: Dassault Simulia.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2018. The Manual for Bridge Evaluation, 3rd edition Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 1973. Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 11th ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1977. Standard Specification for Highway Bridges, 12th ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 1979. AASHTO Interim Specifications for Bridges, Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 1983. AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 13th ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 1996. AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 16th ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 2002. AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials 1994. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 1st ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 2012. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 2014. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 7th ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 2017. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway Officials, 1957. AASHO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 7th ed., Washington D.C.
American Association of State Highway Officials, 1961. AASHO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges”, 8th ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway Officials, 1965. AASHO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 9th ed., Washington, D.C.
Annan, A. P. 2003. Ground-penetrating radar principles, procedures, and applications. Sensors & Software Inc. Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Dereli, O., C. K. Shield, and C. French. 2010. Discrepancies in shear strength of prestressed beams with different specifications. Report No. MN/RC 2010-03. Minneapolis: Dept. of Civil Eng., Uni. of Minnesota, 242.
Erickson, E. L. 1954. Criteria for prestressed concrete bridge. Bureau of Public Roads, US Department of Commerce, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration. 2018. “National Bridge Inventory Database 2018 Data. “Accessed November 2019. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi.cfm.
Garg Anil K., Abolmaali A. 2009. Finite-element modeling and analysis of reinforced concrete box culverts. Journal of Transportation Engineering 135(3), 121–128.
Greene, Gordon W. 1954. Test hammer provides new method of evaluating hardened concrete. Journal Proceedings, Vol. 51(11), 249-256.
Hawkins, N. M. 2005. NCHRP REPORT 549: Simplified shear design of structural concrete members, Appendixes. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., doi: 10.17226/13884
Lou, P., Nassif, H., Su, D., and Truban, P. 2017. Impact of overweight trucks on the service life of bridge girders. Transportation Research Record 2642(1), 103-117.
Magnel, G., Prestressed Concrete, 3rd edition, 1954. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, N.Y., Concrete Publications Ltd., London, United Kingdom.
Nassif, H., Lou, P., Zhang, H., and Srithanirnat, T., 2018. Load Rating of Prestressed Concrete Bridges without Plans (No. FHWA-NJ-BRP-Task2-002). New Jersey. Dept. of Transportation.
Nowak, A. S., El-Hor, H. H. 2016. Serviceability Criteria for Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
PCI Bridge Design Manual Steering Committee. 2003. Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridge Design Manual.
Puckett, J. A., X. S. Huo, M. D. Patrick, M. C. Jablin, D. Mertz, and M. D. Peavy. 2005. Simplified live load distribution factor equations for bridge design, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board CD 11-S.
Ramirez, J. A., Breen, J. E. 1983. Review of design procedures for shear and torsion in reinforced and prestressed concrete. Publication FHWA-TX-84-36+248-2. Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation, Austin.
Suksawang, N., and Nassif, H. 2007. Development of live load distribution factor equation for girder bridges. Transportation Research Record 2028(1), 9-18.
Suksawang, N., Nassif, H., and Su, D. 2013. Verification of shear live-load distribution factor equations for I-girder bridges. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(3), 550-555.