Stress at Ultimate in Internally Unbonded Steel Based on Genetic Expression Programming

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Stress at Ultimate in Internally Unbonded Steel Based on Genetic Expression Programming

Author(s): Nazar Oukaili and Iqbal Peera

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 119

Issue: 6

Appears on pages(s): 177-191

Keywords: flexural concrete member; genetic algorithm; post-tensioning; ultimate loading; unbonded steel tendon

DOI: 10.14359/51734803

Date: 11/1/2022

Abstract:
This study demonstrates the development of a new genetic programming-based model to predict the increase in stress Δfps beyond effective prestress, and the total value of stress fps at ultimate loading in the internally unbonded steel tendons of post-tensioned concrete flexural members. Genetic expression programming (GEP) was employed to develop an accurate predictive model for Δfps, summarizing almost all the influencing parameters including the geometrical properties of the structural member, the mechanical properties of steel and concrete, and the loading type and pattern into one single empirical expression. Comprehensive experimental outcomes of 218 data points were compiled from published literature since 1962 and the experimental program carried out recently by authors on prestressed concrete flexural members (beams and one-way slabs) with internally unbonded steel. To inspect the potentiality of the proposed model against 22 expressions suggested by various researchers and Codes of Practice, an extensive comparative study was carried out to assess Δfps. Compared to the other predictive models, the proposed model showed the highest correlation between the estimated and the experimental stress increase Δfps in internally unbonded steel at ultimate loading with a coefficient of determination R2 of 0.78.

Related References:

1. Alameh, A. S., and Harajli, M. H., “Deflection of Progressively Cracking Partially Prestressed Concrete Flexural Members,” PCI Journal, V. 34, No. 3, 1989, pp. 94-128. doi: 10.15554/pcij.05011989.94.128

2. Harajli, M. H., and Naaman, A. E., “Evaluation of the Inelastic Behavior of Partially Prestressed Concrete Beams,” Report No. UMCE 85-02, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1985.

3. Collins, M. P., and Mitchell, D., Prestressed Concrete Basics, Canadian Prestressed Concrete Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1987.

4. Alkhairi, F. M., and Naaman, A. E., “Analysis of Beams Prestressed with Unbounded Internal or External Tendons,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 119, No. 9, 1993, pp. 2680-2700. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:9(2680)

5. Peng, F., and Xue, W., “Calculating Method for Ultimate Tendon Stress in Internally Unbonded Prestressed Concrete Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 5, Sept. 2019, pp. 225-234. doi: 10.14359/51716764

6. Burns, N. H.; Charney, F. A.; and Vines, W. R., “Tests of One-Way Post-Tensioned Slabs with Unbonded Tendons,” PCI Journal, V. 23, No. 5, 1978, pp. 66-83. doi: 10.15554/pcij.09011978.66.83

7. Au, F. T. K., and Du, J. S., “Prediction of Ultimate Stress in Unbonded Prestressed Tendons,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 56, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1680/macr.2004.56.1.1

8. Au, F. T. K., and Du, J. S., “Deformability of Concrete Beams with Unbonded FRP Tendons,” Engineering Structures, V. 30, No. 12, 2008, pp. 3764-3770. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.003

9. Alqam, M., and Alkhairi, F., “Numerical and Analytical Behavior of Beams Prestressed with Unbonded Internal or External Steel Tendons: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, V. 44, No. 10, 2019, pp. 8149-8170. doi: 10.1007/s13369-019-03934-3

10. Naaman, A. E., and Alkhairi, F. M., “Stress at Ultimate in Unbonded Post-tensioning Tendons: Part 2 - Proposed Methodology,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 88, No. 6, 1991, pp. 683-692.

11. Warwaruk, J.; Sozen, M. A.; and Siess, C. P., “Investigation of Prestressed Reinforced Concrete for Highway Bridge, Part III: Strength and Behavior in Flexure of Prestressed Concrete Beams,” University of Illinois, Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin, No. 464, Urbana, IL, 1962, 105 pp.

12. Pannell, F. N., “The Ultimate Moment of Resistance of Unbonded Prestressed Concrete Beams,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 21, No. 66, 1969, pp. 43-54. doi: 10.1680/macr.1969.21.66.43

13. Mattock, A. H.; Yamazaki, J.; and Kattula, B. T., “Comparative Study of Prestressed Concrete Beams With and Without Bond,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 68, No. 3, Mar. 1971, pp. 116-125.

14. Tam, A., and Pannell, F. N., “The Ultimate Moment of Resistance of Unbounded Partially Prestressed Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 28, No. 97, 1976, pp. 203-208. doi: 10.1680/macr.1976.28.97.203

15. Mojtahedi, S., and Gamble, W. L., “Ultimate Steel Stresses in Unbonded Prestressed Concrete,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 104, No. 7, 1978, pp. 1159-1164. doi: 10.1061/JSDEAG.0004957

16. Cooke, N.; Park, R.; and Yong, P., “Flexural Strength of Prestressed Concrete Members with Unbonded Tendons,” PCI Journal, V. 26, No. 6, 1981, pp. 52-81. doi: 10.15554/pcij.11011981.52.81

17. Tao, X., and Du, G., “Ultimate Stress of Unbonded Tendons in Partially Prestressed Concrete Beams,” PCI Journal, V. 30, No. 6, 1985, pp. 72-91. doi: 10.15554/pcij.11011985.72.91

18. Naaman, A. E., “Stress at Ultimate in Unbonded Prestressing Tendons by Strain Compatibility,” Progress in Structural Engineering. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, 10th edition, D. E. Grierson, A. Franchi, and P. Riva, eds., 1991, pp. 217-227.

19. Harajli, M., and Kanj, M., “Ultimate Flexural Strength of Concrete Members Prestressed with Unbonded Tendons,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 88, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1991, pp. 663-673.

20. Harajli, M. H., and Hijazi, S. A., “Evaluation of the Ultimate Steel Stress in Partially Prestressed Concrete Members,” PCI Journal, V. 36, No. 1, 1991, pp. 62-82. doi: 10.15554/pcij.01011991.62.82

21. Chakrabarti, P. R., “Ultimate Stress for Unbonded Post-tensioning Tendons in Partially Prestressed Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1995, pp. 689-697.

22. Allouche, E. N.; Campbell, T. I.; Green, M. F.; and Soudki, K. A., “Tendon Stress in Continuous Unbonded Prestressed Concrete Members Part 2: Parametric Study,” PCI Journal, V. 44, No. 1, 1999, pp. 60-73. doi: 10.15554/pcij.01011999.60.73

23. Lee, L. H.; Moon, J. H.; and Lim, J. H., “Proposed Methodology for Computing of Unbonded Tendon Stress at Flexural Failure,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 96, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1999, pp. 1040-1048.

24. Naaman, A. E.; Burns, N.; French, C.; Gamble, W. L.; and Mattock, A. H., “Stresses in Unbonded Prestressing Tendons at Ultimate: Recommendation,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 99, No. 4, July-Aug. 2002, pp. 518-529.

25. Roberts-Wollmann, C. L.; Kreger, M. E.; Rogowsky, D. M.; and Breen, J. E., “Stresses in External Tendons at Ultimate,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 102, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2005, pp. 206-213.

26. Ozkul, O.; Nassif, H.; Tanchan, P.; and Harajli, M., “Rational Approach for Predicting Stress in Beams with Unbonded Tendons,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 3, May-June 2008, pp. 338-347.

27. Zheng, W. Z., and Wang, X. D., “Ultimate Stress Increase in Unbonded Tendons in Prestressed Concrete Beams,” Journal of Zhejiang University. Science, V. 11, No. 12, 2010, pp. 998-1014. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A0900618

28. He, Z. Q., and Liu, Z., “Stresses in External and Internal Unbonded Tendons: Unified Methodology and Design Equations,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 136, No. 9, 2010, pp. 1055-1065. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000202

29. Harajli, M. H., “Tendon Stress at Ultimate in Continuous Unbonded Post-Tensioned Members: Proposed Modification of ACI Eq. (18-4) and (18-5),” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2012, pp. 183-192.

30. Ghallab, A., “Calculating Ultimate Tendon Stress in Externally Prestressed Continuous Concrete Beams Using Simplified Formulas,” Engineering Structures, V. 46, 2013, pp. 417-430. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.018

31. Alqam, M.; Alkhairi, F.; and Naaman, A., “An Improved Methodology for the Prediction of the Stress at Ultimate in Unbonded Internal and External Steel Tendons,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, V. 45, No. 10, 2020, pp. 7915-7954. doi: 10.1007/s13369-020-04475-w

32. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-19) and Commentary (ACI 318RM-19) (SI Units),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 628 pp.

33. AASHTO, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” eighth edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2017.

34. CSA A23.3-19, “Design of Concrete Structures,” CSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2019.

35. DIN 1045, “Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Structures,” Deutsches Institut fur Normung, Berlin, Germany, 2001.

36. JGJ 92-04, “Technical Specification for Concrete Structures Prestressed with Unbonded Tendons,” China Academy of Building Research, Beijing, China, 2004.

37. Ozbek, A.; Unsal, M.; and Dikec, A., “Estimating Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rocks Using Genetic Expression Programming,” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, V. 5, No. 4, 2013, pp. 325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.05.006

38. Güneyisi, E. M.; Mermerdaş, K.; and Gültekin, A., “Evaluation and Modeling of Ultimate Bond Strength of Corroded Reinforcement in Reinforced Concrete Elements,” Materials and Structures, V. 49, No. 8, 2016, pp. 3195-3215. doi: 10.1617/s11527-015-0713-4

39. Gholampour, A.; Gandomi, A. H.; and Ozbakkaloglu, T., “New Formulations for Mechanical Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Using Gene Expression Programming,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 130, 2017, pp. 122-145. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.114

40. Murad, Y.; Ashteyat, A.; and Hunaifat, R., “Predictive Model to the Bond Strength of FRP-to-Concrete Under Direct Pullout Using Gene Expression Programming,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, V. 25, No. 8, 2019, pp. 773-784. doi: 10.3846/jcem.2019.10798

41. Al-Ghrery, K.; Kalfat, R.; Al-Mahaidi, R.; Oukaili, N.; Al-Mosawe, A., “Prediction of Concrete Cover Separation in Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with FRP”, Journal of Composites for Construction, V. 25, ASCE, No. 4, 2021, pp. 04021022. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001130

42. McKinney, E.; Chang, M.; Maguire, M.; and Sun, Y., “Prediction of Stress Increase at Ultimate in Unbonded Tendons Using Sparse Principal Component Analysis,” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, V. 13, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1-18. doi: 10.1186/s40069-019-0339-y

43. Menegotto, M., and Pinto, P. E., “Method of Analysis of Cyclically Loaded RC Plane Frames,” IABSE Preliminary Report for Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, Lisbon, Portugal, 1973, pp. 15-22.

44. Peng, F.; Xue, W.; and Tan, Y., “Design Approach for Flexural Capacity of Prestressed Concrete Beams with External Tendons,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 144, No. 12, 2018, p. 04018215. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002208

45. AASHTO, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” first edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 1994.

46. Ferreira, C., “Gene Expression Programming: A New Adaptive Algorithm for Solving Problems,” Complex Systems, V. 13, No. 2, 2001, pp. 87-129.

47. Goldberg, D. E., Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, 1989.

48. Banzhaf, W.; Nordin, P.; Keller, R. E.; and Francone, F. D., Genetic Programming: An Introduction: On the Automatic Evolution of Computer Programs and its Applications, Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.

49. Koza, J. R., Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

50. Ferreira, C., “Gene Expression Programming in Problem Solving,” Soft Computing and Industry, 2002, pp. 635-653.

51. Kalfat, R.; Nazari, A.; Al-Mahaidi, R.; and Sanjayan, J., “Genetic Programming in the Simulation of FRP-to-Concrete Patch-Anchored Joints,” Composite Structures, V. 138, 2016, pp. 305-312. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.005

52. Al-Mosawe, A.; Kalfat, R.; and Al-Mahaidi, R., “Strength of CFRP-Steel Double Strap Joints Under Impact Loads Using Genetic Programming,” Composite Structures, V. 160, 2017, pp. 1205-1211. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.016

53. GeneXproTools 5.0, https://www.gepsoft.com/. (last accessed Oct. 4, 2022)

54. Campbell, T. I., and Chouinard, K. L., “Influence of Non-prestressed Reinforcement on the Strength of Unbonded Partially Prestressed Concrete Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 88, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 1991, pp. 546-551.

55. Alkhairi, F. M., “On the Flexural Behavior of Concrete Beams Prestressed with Unbonded Internal and External Tendons,” PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1991, 411 pp.

56. Kutner, M. H.; Nachtsheim, C.; and Neter, J., Applied Linear Regression Models, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, 2004.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer