How Aggregate Shape and Mortar Rheology Govern Aggregate Settling

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: How Aggregate Shape and Mortar Rheology Govern Aggregate Settling

Author(s): Weishuo Yan, Wei Cui, and Lan Qi

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 119

Issue: 2

Appears on pages(s): 221-230

Keywords: aggregate settling; aggregate shape characteristics; fluid-solid coupling method; mortar rheological properties; self-consolidating concrete (SCC) segregation

DOI: 10.14359/51734358

Date: 3/1/2022

Abstract:
In this paper, a fluid-solid coupling method is used to simulate the aggregate settling in mortar, and the accuracy of this method is verified by comparing the simulation results with experimental results. To evaluate the effects of aggregate shape characteristics and mortar rheological properties on aggregate settling, the authors simulate the settling processes of different aggregates in various mortars. The results show that the shape and orientation of aggregates have a greater influence than aggregate surface properties on settling. The effect of the mortar yield stress is greater than that of mortar plastic viscosity on the aggregate stable state. Considering the interactions between aggregates, the self-consolidating concrete (SCC) segregation process is simulated to observe the motion and distribution of aggregates and analyze the mechanical mechanisms between aggregates.

Related References:

1. Ley-Hernández, A. M., and Feys, D., “How Rheology Governs Dynamic Segregation of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 116, No. 3, May 2019, pp. 131-140. doi: 10.14359/51714507

2. Rols, S.; Ambroise, J.; and Péra, J., “Effects of Different Viscosity Agents on the Properties of Self-Leveling Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 29, No. 2, 1999, pp. 261-266. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00095-7

3. Mesbah, H. A.; Yahia, A.; and Khayat, K. H., “Electrical Conductivity Method to Assess Static Stability of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 41, No. 5, 2011, pp. 451-458. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.01.004

4. Zhu, W.; Gibbs, J. C.; and Bartos, P. J. M., “Uniformity of In Situ Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete in Full-Scale Structural Elements,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 23, No. 1, 2001, pp. 57-64. doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00053-6

5. Naji, S.; Khayat, K. H.; and Karray, M., “Assessment of Static Stability of Concrete Using Shear Wave Velocity Approach,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 114, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2017, pp. 106-115. doi: 10.14359/51689244

6. Spangenberg, J.; Roussel, N.; Hattel, J. H.; Stang, H.; Skocek, J.; and Geiker, M. R., “Flow Induced Particle Migration in Fresh Concrete: Theoretical Frame, Numerical Simulations and Experimental Results on Model Fluids,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 4, 2012, pp. 633-641. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.01.007

7. Assaad, J.; Khayat, K. H.; and Daczko, J., “Evaluation of Static Stability of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 101, No. 3, May-June 2004, pp. 207-215.

8. Roshavelov, T., “Prediction of Fresh Concrete Flow Behavior Based on Analytical Model for Mixture Proportioning,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 35, No. 5, 2005, pp. 831-835. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.019

9. Toutou, Z., and Roussel, N., “Multi Scale Experimental Study of Concrete Rheology: From Water Scale to Gravel Scale,” Materials and Structures, V. 39, No. 2, 2006, pp. 189-199. doi: 10.1617/s11527-005-9047-y

10. Khayat, K. H., and Guizani, Z., “Use of Viscosity-Modifying Admixture to Enhance Stability of Fluid Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 94, No. 4, July-Aug. 1997, pp. 332-340.

11. Petrou, M. F.; Harries, K. A.; Gadala-Maria, F.; and Kolli, V. G., “A Unique Experimental Method for Monitoring Aggregate Settlement in Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 30, No. 5, 2000, pp. 809-816. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00223-4

12. Safawi, M. I.; Iwaki, I.; and Miura, T., “The Segregation Tendency in the Vibration of High Fluidity Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 2, 2004, pp. 219-226. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00249-7

13. Bilgil, A.; Ozturk, B.; and Bilgil, H., “A Numerical Approach to Determine Viscosity-Dependent Segregation in Fresh Concrete,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, V. 162, No. 1, 2005, pp. 225-241. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2003.12.086

14. Han, J.; Wang, K.; Wang, X.; and Monteiro, P. J. M., “2D Image Analysis Method for Evaluating Coarse Aggregate Characteristic and Distribution in Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 127, Nov. 2016, pp. 30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.120

15. Nili, M.; Razmara, M.; Sadeghi, M.; and Razmara, M., “Automatic Image Analysis Process to Appraise Segregation Resistance of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 70, No. 8, 2018, pp. 390-399. doi: 10.1680/jmacr.16.00417

16. Wang, X.; Wang, K.; Han, J.; and Taylor, P., “Image Analysis Applications on Assessing Static Stability and Flowability of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 62, Sept. 2015, pp. 156-167. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.05.002

17. Sokhansefat, G.; Ley, M. T.; Cook, M. D.; Alturki, R.; and Moradian, M., “Investigation of Concrete Workability through Characterization of Aggregate Gradation in Hardened Concrete Using X-Ray Computed Tomography,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 98, Apr. 2019, pp. 150-161. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.02.008

18. Khayat, K. H.; Vanhove, Y.; Pavate, T. V.; and Jolicoeur, C., “Multi-Electrode Conductivity Method to Evaluate Static Stability of Flowable and Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 104, No. 4, July-Aug. 2007, pp. 424-433.

19. Khayat, K. H.; Pavate, T. V.; Assaad, J.; and Jolicoeur, C., “Analysis of Variations in Electrical Conductivity to Assess Stability of Cement-Based Materials,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 100, No. 4, July-Aug. 2003, pp. 302-310.

20. Shen, L.; Struble, L.; and Lange, D., “Modeling Dynamic Segregation of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 106, No. 4, July-Aug. 2009, pp. 375-380.

21. Zhong, W.; Yu, A.; Liu, X.; Tong, Z.; and Zhang, H., “DEM/CFD-DEM Modelling of Non-Spherical Particulate Systems: Theoretical Developments and Applications,” Powder Technology, V. 302, Nov. 2016, pp. 108-152. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.07.010

22. Zhang, H.; Tan, Y.; Shu, S.; Niuc, X.; Trias, F. X.; Lic, D. Y. H.; and Shengd, Y., “Numerical Investigation on the Role of Discrete Element Method in Combined LBM-IFM-DEM Modelling,” Computers & Fluids, V. 94, May 2014, pp. 37-48. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.01.032

23. Zhang, H.; Trias, F. X.; Oliva, A.; Yang, D.; Tan, Y.; Shu, S.; and Sheng, Y., “PIBM: Particulate Immersed Boundary Method for Fluid-Particle Interaction Problems,” Powder Technology, V. 272, July 2014, pp. 1-13.

24. Hu, H. H., “Direct Simulation of Flows of Solid-Liquid Mixtures,” International Journal of Multiphase Flow, V. 22, No. 2, 1996, pp. 335-352. doi: 10.1016/0301-9322(95)00068-2

25. Sedov, L. I., and Hodge, P. G., Jr., “Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, V. 33, No. 1, 1966, pp. 238-238. doi: 10.1115/1.3625016

26. Barnes, H. A.; Hutton, J. F.; and Walters, K., “An Introduction to Rheology,” Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, V. 32, No. 3, 1989, pp. 331-333. doi: 10.1016/0377-0257(89)85015-3

27. Oldroyd, J. G., “A Rational Formulation of the Equations of Plastic Flow for a Bingham Solid,” Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, V. 43, No. 1, 1947, pp. 100-105. doi: 10.1017/S0305004100023239

28. Oldroyd, J. G., “Two-Dimensional Plastic Flow of a Bingham Solid: A Plastic Boundary-Layer Theory for Slow Motion,” Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, V. 43, No. 3, 1947, pp. 383-395. doi: 10.1017/S0305004100023616

29. Fernandes, C.; Faroughi, S. A.; Carneiro, O. S.; Nóbrega, J. M.; and McKinley, G. H., “Fully-Resolved Simulations of Particle-Laden Viscoelastic Fluids Using an Immersed Boundary Method,” Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, V. 266, Apr. 2018, 2019, pp. 80-94.

30. Balmforth, N. J.; Frigaard, I. A.; and Ovarlez, G., “Yielding to Stress: Recent Developments in Viscoplastic Fluid Mechanics,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, V. 46, Aug. 2014, pp. 121-146. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141424

31. Piau, J. M., “Carbopol Gels: Elastoviscoplastic and Slippery Glasses Made of Individual Swollen Sponges: Meso- and Macroscopic Properties, Constitutive Equations and Scaling Laws,” Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, V. 144, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.02.011

32. Bonn, D., and Denn, M. M., “Yield Stress Fluids Slowly Yield to Analysis,” Science, V. 324, No. 5933, 2009, pp. 1401-1402. doi: 10.1126/science.1174217

33. Gomez, C.; Derakhshandeh, B.; Hatzikiriakos, S. G.; and Bennington, C. P. J., “Carbopol as a Model Fluid for Studying Mixing of Pulp Fibre Suspensions,” Chemical Engineering Science, V. 65, No. 3, 2010, pp. 1288-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.09.085

34. Curran, S. J.; Hayes, R. E.; Afacan, A.; Williams, M. C.; and Tanguy, P. A., “Properties of Carbopol Solutions as Models for Yield-Stress Fluids,” Journal of Food Science, V. 67, No. 1, 2002, pp. 176-180. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb11379.x

35. Eshtiaghi, N.; Yap, S. D.; Markis, F.; Baudez, J.-C.; and Slatter, P., “Clear Model Fluids to Emulate the Rheological Properties of Thickened Digested Sludge,” Water Research, V. 46, No. 9, 2012, pp. 3014-3022. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.003

36. Boulekbache, B.; Hamrat, M.; Chemrouk, M.; and Amziane, S., “Flowability of Fibre-Reinforced Concrete and Its Effect on the Mechanical Properties of the Material,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 24, No. 9, 2010, pp. 1664-1671. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.025

37. Blott, S. J., and Pye, K., “Particle Shape: A Review and New Methods of Characterization and Classification,” Sedimentology, V. 55, No. 1, 2008, pp. 31-63.

38. Krumbein, W. C., “Measurement and Geological Significance of Shape and Roundness of Sedimentary Particles,” Journal of Sedimentary Research, V. 11, No. 2, 1941, pp. 64-72.

39. Wentworth, C. K., “A Laboratory and Field Study of Cobble Abrasion,” The Journal of Geology, V. 27, No. 7, 1919, pp. 507-521. doi: 10.1086/622676

40. Khayat, K. H.; Saric-Coric, M.; and Liotta, F., “Influence of Thixotropy on Stability Characteristics of Cement Grout and Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 99, No. 3, May-June 2002, pp. 234-241.

41. Hosseinpoor, M.; Khayat, K. H.; and Yahia, A., “Numerical Simulation of Self-Consolidating Concrete Flow as a Heterogeneous Material in L-Box Set-Up: Effect of Rheological Parameters on Flow Performance,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 83, Aug. 2017, pp. 290-307. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.027

42. Roussel, N., “A Theoretical Frame to Study Stability of Fresh Concrete,” Materials and Structures, V. 39, No. 1, 2006, pp. 81-91. doi: 10.1617/s11527-005-9036-1

43. Wang, Z. M.; Kwan, A. K. H.; and Chan, H. C., “Mesoscopic Study of Concrete I: Generation of Random Aggregate Structure and Finite Element Mesh,” Computers & Structures, V. 70, No. 5, 1999, pp. 533-544. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00177-1

44. El-Chabib, H., and Nehdi, M., “Effect of Mixture Design Parameters on Segregation of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 103, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2006, pp. 374-383.

45. Hosseinpoor, M.; Khayat, K. H.; and Yahia, A., “Numerical Simulation of Self-Consolidating Concrete Flow as a Heterogeneous Material in L-Box Set-Up: Coupled Effect of Reinforcing Bars and Aggregate Content on Flow Characteristics,” Materials and Structures, V. 50, No. 2, 2017, pp. 1-15. doi: 10.1617/s11527-017-1032-8

46. De Larrard, F., “Concrete Mixture Proportioning,” Information Storage and Retrieval, V. 4, No. 2, 2017, pp. 113-131.

47. Kennedy, C. T., “The Design of Concrete Mixes,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 36, No. 2, Feb. 1940, pp. 373-400.

48. Powers, T. C., The Properties of Fresh Concrete, Wiley, New York, 1968.

49. Kwan, A. K. H., and Li, L. G., “Combined Effects of Water Film Thickness and Paste Film Thickness on Rheology of Mortar,” Materials and Structures, V. 45, No. 9, 2012, pp. 1359-1374. doi: 10.1617/s11527-012-9837-y

50. Li, L. G., and Kwan, A. K. H., “Concrete Mix Design Based on Water Film Thickness and Paste Film Thickness,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 39, May 2013, pp. 33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.03.021

51. Lee, J. H.; Kim, J. H.; and Yoon, J. Y., “Prediction of the Yield Stress of Concrete Considering the Thickness of Excess Paste Layer,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 173, June 2018, pp. 411-418. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.124

52. Ghasemi, Y.; Emborg, M.; and Cwirzen, A., “Effect of Water Film Thickness on the Flow in Conventional Mortars and Concrete,” Materials and Structures, V. 52, No. 3, 2019, pp. 1-15. doi: 10.1617/s11527-019-1362-


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer