Title:
Rheological Properties of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers for Three-Dimensional Printing of Structures
Author(s):
M. D. M. Paiva, L. D. Fonseca Rocha, L. I. Castrillon Fernandez, R. D. Toledo Filho, E. C. C. M. Silva, R. Neumann, and O. A. Mendoza Reales
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
118
Issue:
6
Appears on pages(s):
177-187
Keywords:
additive manufacturing; digital construction; geopolymer; rheology; three-dimensional (3D) printing
DOI:
10.14359/51733122
Date:
11/1/2021
Abstract:
The use of geopolymers as binders in three-dimensional (3D) printing processes has great potential due to their fast strength development, high durability, and lower environmental impact compared to portland cement matrixes. Metakaolin-based geopolymers are a viable solution for a Brazilian-based additive manufacturing application due to the widespread availability of kaolinitic clays, which minimizes transportation costs and reduces the associated CO2 emissions. Nevertheless, it is necessary to identify the rheological behavior of this type of binder to evaluate its suitability in an extrusion process. This work presents a calorimetric
and rheological characterization of pastes and mortars produced with a metakaolin-based geopolymer as the binder, exploring the influence of the nature of the activator, the water-solids ratio, and the aggregate on the rheological parameters that describe a 3D printing process, and on their evolution in time. Two types of metakaolin-based geopolymers were characterized: one activated with a mixture of potassium hydroxide (KOH) and potassium silicate (K2SiO3), and one activated with a mixture of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (NaSiO3). The water-solids ratio of each geopolymer paste varied between 0.40 and 0.50, and natural sand was added in a 40% volume per volume percent (v/v) fixed proportion to produce mortars. The yield stress of each sample was measured after different resting times using a vane rheometer. Isothermal heat flow curves were acquired in the same time scale to connect the reaction kinetics to the rheological measurements. The water-solids ratio and the presence of aggregate are able to modify the initial yield stress and the thixotropic buildup of the matrix. The sodium-based activator is correlated with a rapid structural buildup because of faster precursor dissolution and gel formation. The presence of sand increased the shear stress values and generated stiffer systems compared to the pure geopolymer pastes.
Related References:
1. Ghaffar, S. H.; Corker, J.; and Fan, M., “Additive Manufacturing Technology and Its Implementation in Construction as an Eco-Innovative Solution,” Automation in Construction, V. 93, Sept. 2018, pp. 1-11.
2. Ngo, T. D.; Kashani, A.; Imbalzano, G.; Nguyen, K. T. Q.; and Hui, D., “Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 143, June 2018, 2018, pp. 172-193.
3. Khan, M. A., “Mix Suitable for Concrete 3D Printing: A Review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, V. 32, No. 4, 2020, pp. 831-837. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.825
4. Jayathilakage, R.; Rajeev, P.; and Sanjayan, J. G., “Yield Stress Criteria to Assess the Buildability of 3D Concrete Printing,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 240, Apr. 2020, p. 117989. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117989
5. Ivanova, I., and Mechtcherine, V., “Possibilities and Challenges of Constant Shear Rate Test for Evaluation of Structural Build-Up Rate of Cementitious Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 130, Apr. 2020, p. 105974. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.105974
6. Paul, S. C.; Tay, Y. W. D.; Panda, B.; and Tan, M. J., “Fresh and Hardened Properties of 3D Printable Cementitious Materials for Building and Construction,” Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, V. 18, No. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 311-319. doi: 10.1016/j.acme.2017.02.008
7. Moeini, M. A.; Hosseinpoor, M.; and Yahia, A., “Effectiveness of the Rheometric Methods to Evaluate the Build-Up of Cementitious Mortars Used for 3D Printing,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 257, Oct. 2020, p. 119551. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119551
8. Panda, B.; Paul, S. C.; Hui, L. J.; Tay, Y. W. D.; and Tan, M. J., “Additive Manufacturing of Geopolymer for Sustainable Built Environment,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 167, Nov. 2017, pp. 281-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.165
9. Paiva, M. D. M.; Silva, E. C. C. M.; Melo, D. M. A.; Martinelli, A. E.; and Schneider, J. F., “A Geopolymer Cementing System for Oil Wells Subject to Steam Injection,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, V. 169, Oct. 2018, pp. 748-759. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.022
10. Kriven, W. M., “Geopolymer-Based Composites,” Ceramic- and Carbon-Matrix Composites, V. I. Trefilov, ed., V. 5-8, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2018, pp. 269-280.
11. Davidovits, J. Geopolymer: Chemistry and Applications, Geopolymer Institute, Saint-Quentin, France, 2008, 680 pp.
12. Bong, S. H.; Nematollahi, B.; Nazari, A.; Xia, M.; and Sanjayan, J. G., “Fresh and Hardened Properties of 3D Printable Geopolymer Cured in Ambient Temperature,” RILEM Bookseries, V. 19, Springer International Publishing, Basel, Switzerland, 2019, pp. 3-11. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99519-9_1
13. Nematollahi, B.; Sanjayan, J.; and Shaikh, F. U. A., “Synthesis of Heat and Ambient Cured One-Part Geopolymer Mixes with Different Grades of Sodium Silicate,” Ceramics International, V. 41, No. 4, May 2015, pp. 5696-5704. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.12.154
14. Davidovits, J., “Geopolymers,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, V. 37, No. 8, Aug. 1991, pp. 1633-1656. doi: 10.1007/BF01912193
15. Panda, B.; Unluer, C.; and Tan, M. J., “Investigation of the Rheology and Strength of Geopolymer Mixtures for Extrusion-Based 3D Printing,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 94, Nov. 2018, pp. 307-314. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.10.002
16. Panda, B.; Unluer, C.; and Tan, M. J., “Extrusion and Rheology Characterization of Geopolymer Nanocomposites Used in 3D Printing,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 176, Nov. 2019, p. 107290. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107290
17. Zhang, D.-W.; Wang, D.-m.; Lin, X.-Q.; and Zhang, T., “The Study of the Structure Rebuilding and Yield Stress of 3D Printing Geopolymer Pastes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 184, Sept. 2018, pp. 575-580. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.233
18. Al-Qutaifi, S.; Nazari, A.; and Bagheri, A., “Mechanical Properties of Layered Geopolymer Structures Applicable in Concrete 3D-Printing,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 176, July 2018, pp. 690-699. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.195
19. Bong, S. H.; Nematollahi, B.; Xia, M.; Nazari, A.; Sanjayan, J.; and Pan, J., “Properties of 3D-Printable Ductile Fibre-Reinforced Geopolymer Composite for Digital Construction Applications,” RILEM Bookseries, V. 23, Springer International Publishing, Basel, Switzerland, 2019, pp. 363-372. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-22566-7_42
20. Sun, C.; Xiang, J.; Xu, M.; He, Y.; Tong, Z.; and Cui, X., “3D Extrusion Free Forming of Geopolymer Composites: Materials Modification and Processing Optimization,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 258, June 2020, p. 120986. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120986
21. Zhou, G.-X.; Li, C.; Zhao, Z.; Qi, Y.-Z.; Yang, Z.-H.; Jia, D.-C.; Zhong, J.; and Zhou, Y., “3D Printing Geopolymer Nanocomposites: Graphene Oxide Size Effects on a Reactive Matrix,” Carbon, V. 164, Aug. 2020, pp. 215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.021
22. Fu, S.; He, P.; Wang, M.; Wang, M.; Wang, R.; Yuan, J.; Jia, D.; and Cui, J., “Monoclinic-Celsian Ceramics Formation: Through Thermal Treatment of Ion-Exchanged 3D Printing Geopolymer Precursor,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, V. 39, No. 2-3, Feb.-Mar. 2019, pp. 563-573. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.08.036
23. ASTM C305-20, “Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 3 pp.
24. Mendoza Reales, O. A.; Arias Jaramillo, Y. P.; Ochoa Botero, J. C.; Delgado, C. A.; Quintero, J. H.; and Toledo Filho, R. D., “Influence of MWCNT/Surfactant Dispersions on the Rheology of Portland Cement Pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 107, May 2018, pp. 101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.020
25. Roussel, N., “A Thixotropy Model for Fresh Fluid Concretes: Theory, Validation and Applications,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 10, Oct. 2006, pp. 1797-1806. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.05.025
26. Barnes, H. A., and Nguyen, Q. D., “Rotating Vane Rheometry—A Review,” Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, V. 98, No. 1, Mar. 2001, pp. 1-14. doi: 10.1016/S0377-0257(01)00095-7
27. Stickland, A. D.; Kumar, A.; Kusuma, T. E.; Scales, P. J.; Tindley, A.; Biggs, S.; and Buscall, R., “The Effect of Premature Wall Yield on Creep Testing of Strongly Flocculated Suspensions,” Rheologica Acta, V. 54, No. 5, May 2015, pp. 337-352. doi: 10.1007/s00397-015-0847-x
28. Mechtcherine, V.; Bos, F. P.; Perrot, A.; Leal da Silva, W. R.; Nerella, V. N.; Fataei, S.; Wolfs, R. J. M.; Sonebi, M.; and Roussel, N., “Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing with Cement-Based Materials – Production Steps, Processes, and Their Underlying Physics: A Review,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 132, June 2020, p. 106037.
29. Mendoza Reales, O. A.; Duda, P.; Silva, E. C. C. M.; Paiva, M. D. M.; and Toledo Filho, R. D., “Nanosilica Particles as Structural Buildup Agents for 3D Printing with Portland Cement Pastes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 219, Sept. 2019, pp. 91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.174
30. Wangler, T.; Lloret, E.; Reiter, L.; Hack, N.; Gramazio, F.; Kohler, M.; Bernhard, M.; Dillenburger, B.; Buchli, J.; Roussel, N.; and Flatt, R., “Digital Concrete: Opportunities and Challenges,” RILEM Technical Letters, V. 1, 2016, pp. 67-75. doi: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.16
31. Roussel, N., and Cussigh, F., “Distinct-Layer Casting of SCC: The Mechanical Consequences of Thixotropy,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 38, No. 5, May 2008, pp. 624-632. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.023
32. Zhang, Z.; Wang, H.; Provis, J. L.; Bullen, F.; Reid, A.; and Zhu, Y., “Quantitative Kinetic and Structural Analysis of Geopolymers. Part 1. The Activation of Metakaolin with Sodium Hydroxide,” Thermochimica Acta, V. 539, July 2012, pp. 23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2012.03.021
33. Yao, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, H.; and Chen, Y., “Geopolymerization Process of Alkali–Metakaolinite Characterized by Isothermal Calorimetry,” Thermochimica Acta, V. 493, No. 1-2, Sept. 2009, pp. 49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2009.04.002
34. Cai, J.; Li, X.; Tan, J.; and Vandevyvere, B., “Thermal and Compressive Behaviors of Fly Ash and Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 30, July 2020, p. 101307.
35. Bashir, S. T.; Yang, L.; Liggat, J. J.; and Thomason, J. L., “Kinetics of Dissolution of Glass Fibre in Hot Alkaline Solution,” Journal of Materials Science, V. 53, No. 3, Feb. 2018, pp. 1710-1722. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1627-z
36. Longhi, M. A.; Walkley, B.; Rodríguez, E. D.; Kirchheim, A. P.; Zhang, Z.; and Wang, H., “New Selective Dissolution Process to Quantify Reaction Extent and Product Stability in Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 176, Nov. 2019, p. 107172. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107172
37. Bell, J. L.; Sarin, P.; Driemeyer, P. E.; Haggerty, R. P.; Chupas, P. J.; and Kriven, W. M., “X-Ray Pair Distribution Function Analysis of a Metakaolin-Based, KAlSi2O6•5.5H2O Inorganic Polymer (Geopolymer),” Journal of Materials Chemistry, V. 18, No. 48, 2008, pp. 5974-5981. doi: 10.1039/b808157c
38. White, C. E.; Provis, J. L.; Proffen, T.; and Van Deventer, J. S. J., “The Effects of Temperature on the Local Structure of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Binder: A Neutron Pair Distribution Function Investigation,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 93, No. 10, 2010, pp. 3486-3492. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03906.x
39. Sack, R. O., and Ghiorso, M. S., “Thermodynamics of Feldspathoid Solutions,” Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, V. 130, No. 3-4, Feb. 1998, pp. 256-274. doi: 10.1007/s004100050364
40. Gadkar, A., and Subramaniam, K. V. L., “An Evaluation of Yield and Maxwell Fluid Behaviors of Fly Ash Suspensions in Alkali-Silicate Solutions,” Materials and Structures, V. 52, No. 6, Dec. 2019, Articl 117.
41. Panda, B., and Tan, M. J., “Experimental Study on Mix Proportion and Fresh Properties of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer for 3D Concrete Printing,” Ceramics International, V. 44, No. 9, June 2018, pp. 10258-10265. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.031
42. Panda, B.; Bhagath Singh, G. V. P.; Unluer, C.; and Tan, M. J., “Synthesis and Characterization of One-Part Geopolymers for Extrusion Based 3D Concrete Printing,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 220, May 2019, pp. 610-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.185
43. Kondepudi, K., and Subramaniam, K. V. L., “Rheological Characterization of Low-Calcium Fly Ash Suspensions in Alkaline Silicate Colloidal Solutions for Geopolymer Concrete Production,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 234, Oct. 2019, pp. 690-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.124
44. Banfill, P. F. G., “Rheology of Fresh Cement and Concrete,” Rheology Reviews, The British Society of Rheology, UK, V. 2006, 2006, pp. 61-130.
45. Panda, B.; Paul, S. C.; Mohamed, N. A. N.; Tay, Y. W. D.; and Tan, M. J., “Measurement of Tensile Bond Strength of 3D Printed Geopolymer Mortar,” Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, V. 113, Jan. 2018, pp. 108-116.