Seismic Performance of Precast Hollow-Core Floors: Part 2—Assessment of Existing Buildings

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Seismic Performance of Precast Hollow-Core Floors: Part 2—Assessment of Existing Buildings

Author(s): Aishwarya Y. Puranam, Samuel R. Corney, Kenneth J. Elwood, Richard S. Henry, and Des Bull

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 118

Issue: 5

Appears on pages(s): 65-77

Keywords: floor diaphragm; hollow-core floors; precast concrete; seismic assessment

DOI: 10.14359/51732822

Date: 9/1/2021

Abstract:
Past research has indicated that precast concrete hollow-core floors in buildings are susceptible to non-ductile failure modes when subjected to earthquake deformations. While this research has led to the development of more robust connection details suitable for hollow-core floors in new buildings, the existing building stock with hollow-core floors in New Zealand is still at risk and needs to be assessed. Damage to buildings containing hollow-core floors in Wellington, New Zealand, during the 2016 Kaikoura Earthquake prompted the need to better understand the behavior of hollow-core floors and enable those with limited drift capacity to be retrofitted or replaced. Based on tests described in a companion paper, models are developed for three potential failure modes: loss of seating (LoS), positive moment failure (PMF), and negative moment failure (NMF). Implementation of these models in the New Zealand Seismic Assessment Guidelines is discussed. Applying the Guidelines to a database of 112 existing buildings with hollow-core floor units in Wellington indicates that the most likely mode of failure is loss of seating.

Related References:

ASCE/SEI 41-17, 2017, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 550 pp.

Brunsdon, D.; Hare, J.; and Elwood, K., 2017, “Engineering Assessment Processes for Wellington Buildings Following the November 2016 Kaikoura Earthquakes,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, V. 50, No. 2, pp. 338-342. doi: 10.5459/bnzsee.50.2.338-342

Büker, F.; Poland, C.; and Brooke, N., 2020, “Hollow-Core Assessment Worked Example,” Journal of the Structural Engineering Society of New Zealand, V. 33, No. 2, pp. 44-86.

Bull, D., and Matthews, J., 2003, “Proof of Concept Tests for Hollow-Core Floor Unit Connections,” Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Corney, S. R.; Elwood, K. J.; Henry, R. S.; and Nims, D. K., 2018, “Assessment of Existing Concrete Buildings in Wellington with Precast Floors,” Natural Hazards Research Platform, New Zealand, 31 pp.

Corney, S. R.; Puranam, A.; Elwood, K. J.; Henry, R. S.; and Bull, D., 2021, “Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Hollow-Core Floors: Part 1—Experimental Data,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 118, No. 5, Sept. doi: 10.14359/51732821

DBH, 2007, “Hollow Core Floor Overview Report,” Department of Building and Housing, Wellington, New Zealand.

Fenwick, R. C., and Megget, L. M., 1993, “Elongation and Load Deflection Characteristics of Reinforced Concrete Members Containing Plastic Hinges,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, V. 26, No. 1, pp. 28-41.

Fenwick, R.; Bull, D.; and Gardiner, D., 2010, “Assessment of Hollow-Core Floors for Seismic Performance (2010-2),” Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 164 pp.

Henry, R. S.; Dizhur, D.; Elwood, K. J.; Hare, J.; and Brunsdon, D., 2017, “Damage to Concrete Buildings with Precast Floors during the 2016 Kaikoura Earthquake,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, V. 50, No. 2, pp. 174-186. doi: 10.5459/bnzsee.50.2.174-186

Jensen, J., 2006, “The Seismic Behaviour of Existing Hollowcore Seating Connections Pre and Post Retrofit,” ME thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 292 pp.

Liew, H. Y., 2004, “Performance of Hollowcore Floor Seating Connection Details,” ME thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 278 pp.

Lindsay, R., 2004, “Experiments on the Seismic Performance of Hollow-Core Floor Systems in Precast Concrete Buildings,” ME thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 190 pp.

MacPherson, C., 2005, “Seismic Performance and Forensic Analysis of Precast Concrete Hollow-Core Floor Super-Assemblage,” ME thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 246 pp.

Marder, K.; Motter, C.; Elwood, K. J.; and Clifton, G. C., 2018, “Testing of 17 Identical Ductile Reinforced Concrete Beams with Various Loading Protocols and Boundary Conditions,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 34, No. 3, pp. 1025–1049.

Matthews, J., 2004, “Hollow-Core Floor Slab Performance Following a Severe Earthquake,” PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 523 pp.

NZ Guideline, 2018, “Part C5: Technical Proposal to Revise the Engineering Assessment Guidelines,” 252 pp., www.eq-assess.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Technical_Proposal_to_Revise_C5_30112018.pdf. (last accessed July 6, 2021)

NZS 3101:2006, 2017, “Concrete Structures Standard, Amendment 3,” Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 15 pp.

Woods, L. J.; Fenwick, R. C.; and Bull, D. K., 2008, “Seismic Performance of Hollow-core Flooring: the Significance of Negative Bending Moments,” 2008 New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering Conference, 9 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer