Development of Sustainable Engineered Cementitious Composites Using Recycled Concrete Aggregates— Feasibility Study Based on Mechanical Properties

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Development of Sustainable Engineered Cementitious Composites Using Recycled Concrete Aggregates— Feasibility Study Based on Mechanical Properties

Author(s): Adeyemi Adesina and Sreekanta Das

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 118

Issue: 4

Appears on pages(s): 97-107

Keywords: : engineered cementitious composites (ECC); fly ash; mechanical properties; microsilica sand (MSS); recycled concrete (RC); sustainability index

DOI: 10.14359/51732794

Date: 7/1/2021

Abstract:
Engineered cementitious composites (ECC) are special fiber-reinforced cementitious composites with outstanding performance. However, the high cost and unavailability of the special sand (that is, microsilica sand [MSS]) used as the aggregate for such composites have limited its use and even made it impractical in some geographical locations. Therefore, there is a dire need to find alternative materials that can be used to replace MSS in ECC. This study was carried out to investigate the feasibility of using recycled concrete (RC) as an alternative aggregate, which is a much cheaper and more sustainable option as opposed to the conventional MSS currently used in ECC. Fly ash—the coal-based, thermal, plant-generated waste material—was incorporated as an alternative binder to partially replace the traditional binder, portland cement (PC), which is a large greenhouse emitter. Thus, the use of fly ash to replace a high volume of ECC would result in a reduction in the carbon footprint of ECC. The RC was used to replace the MSS in proportions ranging from 0 to 100% at an increment of 25%. The mechanical performance of the ECC mixtures was assessed in terms of the compressive, tensile, and flexural properties. The results obtained from this study showed that the use of RC as a partial replacement of MSS in ECC mixtures resulted in a satisfactory ECC mixture. However, at a replacement ratio of 75% and above, the performance of ECC may not be acceptable. The sustainability index assessment of the mixtures indicates that the use of RC as a replacement of up to 50% of MSS is optimum.

Related References:

1. Son, H.; Kim, C.; Chong, W. K.; and Chou, J. S., “Implementing Sustainable Development in the Construction Industry: Constructors’ Perspectives in the US and Korea,” Sustainable Development, V. 19, No. 5, 2011, pp. 337-347. doi: 10.1002/sd.442

2. Jaya, R. P.; Bakar, B. H. A.; Johari, M. A. M.; and Ibrahim, M. H. W., “Strength and Permeability Properties of Concrete Containing Rice Husk Ash with Different Grinding Time,” Central European Journal of Engineering, V. 1, No. 1, Feb. 2011, pp. 103-112. doi: 10.2478/s13531-010-0003-4

3. Ramadhansyah, P. J.; Abu Bakar, B. H.; Megat Azmi, M. J.; and Wan Ibrahim, M. H., “Engineering Properties of Normal Concrete Grade 40 Containing Rice Husk Ash at Different Grinding Times,” International Journal of Technology, V. 2, No. 1, July 2011, pp. 10-19. doi: 10.2478/v10077-011-0001-0

4. Mangi, S. A.; Wan Ibrahim, M. H.; Jamaluddin, N.; Arshad, M. F.; and Ramadhansyah, P. J., “Effects of Ground Coal Bottom Ash on the Properties of Concrete,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, V. 14, No. 1, Feb. 2019, pp. 338-350.

5. Li, V. C.; Wang, S.; and Wu, C., “Tensile Strain-Hardening Behavior of Polyvinyl Alcohol Engineered Cementitious Composite (PVA-ECC),” ACI Materials Journal, V. 98, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2001, pp. 483-492. doi: 10.14359/10851

6. Li, V. C., “Integrated Structures and Materials Design,” Materials and Structures, V. 40, No. 6, 2007, pp. 387-396. doi: 10.1617/s11527-006-9146-4

7. Abid, S. R.; Shamkhi, M. S.; Mahdi, N. S.; and Daek, Y. H., “Hydro-Abrasive Resistance of Engineered Cementitious Composites with PP and PVA Fibers,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 187, Oct. 2018, pp. 168-177. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.194

8. Adesina, A., and Das, S., “Mechanical Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composite Incorporating Glass as Aggregates,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 260, July 2020, p. 121113. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121113

9. Jin, W.; Meyer, C.; and Baxter, S., “‘Glascrete’—Concrete with Glass Aggregate,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 97, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2000, pp. 208-213. doi: 10.14359/825

10. Awoyera, P. O.; Adesina, A.; and Gobinath, R., “Role of Recycling Fine Materials as Filler for Improving Performance of Concrete—A Review,” Australian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 17, No. 2, 2019, pp. 85-95. doi: 10.1080/14488353.2019.1626692

11. Adesina, A., and Awoyera, P., “Overview of Trends in the Application of Waste Materials in Self-Compacting Concrete Production,” SN Applied Sciences, V. 1, No. 8, 2019, p. 962 doi: 10.1007/s42452-019-1012-4

12. Awoyera, P. O., and Adesina, A., “Plastic Wastes to Construction Products: Status, Limitations and Future Perspective,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, V. 12, June 2020, p. e00330. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00330

13. Gorospe, K.; Booya, E.; Adesina, A.; and Das, S., “Shrinkage and Expansion of Glass Aggregate Cement Mortars,” Proceedings, Canadian Society of Civil Engineers Annual Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, June 2019, pp. 1-10.

14. Turk, K., and Demirhan, S., “The Mechanical Properties of Engineered Cementitious Composites Containing Limestone Powder Replaced by Microsilica Sand,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 40, No. 2, 2013, pp. 151-157. doi: 10.1139/cjce-2012-0281

15. Huang, X.; Ranade, R.; Ni, W.; and Li, V. C., “Development of Green Engineered Cementitious Composites Using Iron Ore Tailings as Aggregates,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 44, July 2013, pp. 757-764. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.088

16. Huang, X.; Ranade, R.; Zhang, Q.; Ni, W.; and Li, V. C., “Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Green Lightweight Engineered Cementitious Composites,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 48, Nov. 2013, pp. 954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.104

17. Pedro, D.; de Brito, J.; and Evangelista, L., “Performance of Concrete Made with Aggregates Recycled from Precasting Industry Waste: Influence of the Crushing Process,” Materials and Structures, V. 48, No. 12, 2015, pp. 3965-3978. doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0456-7

18. Amorim, P.; De Brito, J.; and Evangelista, L., “Concrete Made with Coarse Concrete Aggregate: Influence of Curing on Durability,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 109, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2012, pp. 195-204. doi: 10.14359/51683706

19. Adesina, A., “Concrete Sustainability Issues,” Proceedings, Thirty Eighth Cement and Concrete Science Conference, Coventry University, London, UK, Sept. 2018, p. 2.

20. Kumar, P., and Singh, N., “Influence of Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Coal Bottom Ash on Various Properties of High Volume Fly Ash-Self Compacting Concrete,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 32, Nov. 2020, p. 101491. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101491

21. Singh, N.; Mithulraj, M.; and Arya, S., “Utilization of Coal Bottom Ash in Recycled Concrete Aggregates Based Self Compacting Concrete Blended with Metakaolin,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, V. 144, May 2019, pp. 240-251. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.044

22. Singh, N.; Kumar, P.; and Goyal, P., “Reviewing the Behaviour of High Volume Fly Ash based Self Compacting Concrete,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 26, Nov. 2019, p. 100882. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100882

23. Li, J., and Yang, E.-H., “Macroscopic and Microstructural Properties of Engineered Cementitious Composites Incorporating Recycled Concrete Fines,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 78, Apr. 2017, pp. 33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.12.013

24. Kan, L.-L., and Shi, H.-S., “Investigation of Self-Healing Behavior of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) Materials,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 29, Apr. 2012, pp. 348-356. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.051

25. ASTM C150/C150M-20, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.

26. ASTM C618-19, “Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 5 pp.

27. Adesina, A., and Das, S., “Mechanical Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites Incorporating Recycled Glass Powder,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 47, No. 12, 2020, pp. 1311-1319. doi: 10.1139/cjce-2019-0524

28. Wang, S., and Li, V. C., “Engineered Cementitious Composites with High-Volume Fly Ash,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 104, No. 3, May-June 2007, pp. 233-241. doi: 10.14359/18668

29. Yang, E.-H.; Yang, Y.; and Li, V. C., “Use of High Volumes of Fly Ash to Improve ECC Mechanical Properties and Material Greenness,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 104, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2007, pp. 620-628. doi: 10.14359/18966

30. Adesina, A., and Das, S., “Influence of Glass Powder on the Durability Properties of Engineered Cementitious Composites,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 242, May 2020, p. 118199. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118199

31. Adesina, A., and Das, S., “Performance of Green Fibre-Reinforced Composite Made with Sodium-Carbonate-Activated Slag as a Binder,” Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, V. 5, No. 46, May 2020, pp. 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s41062-020-00296-w

32. ASTM C109/C109M-05, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2005, 9 pp.

33. ASTM C469/C469M-14e1, “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, pp. 2-6.

34. ASTM C1609/C1609M-19a, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam with Third-Point Loading),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 8 pp.

35. Japan Society of Civil Engineers, “Recommendations for Design and Construction of High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement Composite with Multiple Fine Cracks (HPFRCC),” JSCE, Tokyo, Japan, 2008.

36. ASTM C597-16, “Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity through Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. 2016, 4 pp.

37. Hammond, G. P., and Jones, C. I., “Embodied Energy and Carbon in Construction Materials,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Energy, V. 161, No. 2, May 2008, pp. 87-98. doi: 10.1680/ener.2008.161.2.87

38. Tam, V. W. Y.; Soomro, M.; and Evangelista, A. C. J., “A Review of Recycled Aggregate in Concrete Applications (2000–2017),” Construction and Building Materials, V. 172, May 2018, pp. 272-292. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.240

39. Özbay, E.; Karahan, O.; Lachemi, M.; Hossain, K. M. A.; and Duran Atiş, C., “Investigation of Properties of Engineered Cementitious Composites Incorporating High Volumes of Fly Ash and Metakaolin,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 109, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2012, pp. 565-571. doi: 10.14359/51684088

40. Kou, S. C., and Poon, C. S., “Long-Term Mechanical and Durability Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Prepared with the Incorporation of Fly Ash,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 37, Mar. 2013, pp. 12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.12.011

41. Bahrami, N.; Zohrabi, M.; Mahmoudy, S. A.; and Akbari, M., “Optimum Recycled Concrete Aggregate and Micro-Silica Content in Self-Compacting Concrete: Rheological, Mechanical and Microstructural Properties,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 31, Sept. 2020, p. 101361. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101361

42. Evangelista, L., and de Brito, J., “Durability Performance of Concrete Made with Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 32, No. 1, 2010, pp. 9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.09.005

43. Gonçalves, T.; Silva, R. V.; de Brito, J.; Fernández, J. M.; and Esquinas, A. R., “Mechanical and Durability Performance of Mortars with Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Reactive Magnesium Oxide as Partial Cement Replacement,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 105, Jan. 2020, p. 103420. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103420

44. Sato, R.; Maruyama, I.; Sogabe, T.; and Sogo, M., “Flexural Behavior of Reinforced Recycled Concrete Beams,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 5, No. 1, 2007, pp. 43-61. doi: 10.3151/jact.5.43

45. Corinaldesi, V., “Mechanical and Elastic Behaviour of Concretes Made of Recycled-Concrete Coarse Aggregates,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 24, No. 9, 2010, pp. 1616-1620. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.031

46. Choi, W.-C., and Yun, H.-D., “Long-Term Deflection and Flexural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Recycled Aggregate,” Materials & Design, V. 51, Oct. 2013, pp. 742-750. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.044

47. Ohno, M., and Li, V. C., “An Integrated Design Method of Engineered Geopolymer Composite,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 88, Apr, 2018, pp. 73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.02.001

48. Kazemian, F.; Rooholamini, H.; and Hassani, A., “Mechanical and Fracture Properties of Concrete Containing Treated and Untreated Recycled Concrete Aggregates,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 209, June 2019, pp. 690-700. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.179

49. Silva, R. V.; de Brito, J.; and Dhir, R. K., “Performance of Cementitious Renderings and Masonry Mortars Containing Recycled Aggregates from Construction and Demolition Wastes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 105, Feb. 2016, pp. 400-415. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.171

50. Kou, S. C.; Poon, C. S.; and Chan, D., “Influence of Fly Ash as Cement Replacement on the Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 19, No. 9, 2007, pp. 709-717. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:9(709)

51. Silva, R. V.; de Brito, J.; and Dhir, R. K., “Tensile Strength Behaviour of Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 83, May 2015, pp. 108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.034

52. Kou, S.-C.; Poon, C.-S.; and Agrela, F., “Comparisons of Natural and Recycled Aggregate Concretes Prepared with the Addition of Different Mineral Admixtures,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 33, No. 8, 2011, pp. 788-795. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.05.009

53. Özbay, E.; Şahmaran, M.; Lachemi, M.; and Yücel, H. E., “Effect of Microcracking on Frost Durability of High-Volume-Fly-Ash- and Slag-Incorporated Engineered Cementitious Composites,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 110, No. 3, May-June 2013, pp. 259-267. doi: 10.14359/51685659

54. Zou, F.; Hu, C.; Wang, F.; Ruan, Y.; and Hu, S., “Enhancement of Early-Age Strength of the High Content Fly Ash Blended Cement Paste by Sodium Sulfate and C–S–H Seeds towards a Greener Binder,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 244, Jan. 2020, p. 118566. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118566

55. Deschner, F.; Winnefeld, F.; Lothenbach, B.; Seufert, S.; Schwesig, P.; Dittrich, S.; Goetz-Neunhoeffer, F.; and Neubauer, J., “Hydration of Portland Cement with High Replacement by Siliceous Fly Ash,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 10, 2012, pp. 1389-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.06.009

56. Huseien, G. F., and Shah, K. W., “Durability and Life Cycle Evaluation of Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Fly Ash as GBFS Replacement with Alkali Activation,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 235, Feb, 2020, p. 117458 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117458


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer