Long-Term Behavior of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer- Reinforced Columns under Multi-Axial Loading

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Long-Term Behavior of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer- Reinforced Columns under Multi-Axial Loading

Author(s): Yail J. Kim

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 119

Issue: 2

Appears on pages(s): 31-44

Keywords: fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP); long-term; modeling; sustained loading; time-dependent behavior

DOI: 10.14359/51732649

Date: 3/1/2022

Abstract:
This paper presents the time-dependent behavior of non-slender concrete columns reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars under concentric, uniaxial, and biaxial loadings. A service-level load is applied at 28 days after concrete casting and sustained for up to 100 years. Conforming to force equilibrium and displacement compatibility, a sectional analysis model is developed in conjunction with a mathematical procedure, called Bayesian inference, to address potential uncertainty. The formulated model is validated against published experimental data and is employed to predict the columns’ response with variable eccentricities, loading angles, concrete strengths, and section losses. When the short-term loading is shifted from concentric to uniaxial-eccentric, abrupt changes are noticed in the concrete and GFRP strains. Biaxial loading brings about unfavorable distress compared with its uniaxial counterpart. Excessive biaxial loading angles between 30 and 40 degrees, measured from the horizontal axis, swiftly raise the short-term concrete strains. Regarding the characteristics of the constituent materials, early-age responses are remarkable during the 2 months after loading. Under the eccentric loadings, long-term concrete stresses are redistributed, and an irregular pattern is observed in the compression region for the first 10 years. Furthermore, creep and shrinkage relieve the concrete stresses over time. The elastic and shrinkage components in the long-term concrete strains are appreciable with the uniaxial and biaxial loadings, whereas the creep component accounts for less than 1% of the total strains for 100 years. With an increase in the concrete strength, GFRP strains decrease; however, the reinforcing bar strains rise as the concrete section spatially damages. When the column is biaxially loaded, the vulnerability of creep rupture is elevated in the GFRP reinforcement relative to the case of the uniaxial loading.

Related References:

1. Mertol, H. C.; Rizkalla, S.; Zia, P.; and Mirmiran, A., “Creep and Shrinkage Behavior of High-Strength Concrete and Minimum Reinforcement Ratio for Bridge Columns,” PCI Journal, V. 55, No. 3, 2010, pp.  138-154. doi: 10.15554/pcij.06012010.138.154

2. Neville, A. M., Properties of Concrete, fourth edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1996.

3. ACI Committee 209, “Guide for Modeling and Calculating Shrinkage and Creep in Hardened Concrete (ACI 209.2R-08),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2008, 45 pp.

4. Manning, D. G., “Corrosion Performance of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Steel: North American Experience,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 10, No. 5, 1996, pp. 349-365. doi: 10.1016/0950-0618(95)00028-3

5. ACI Committee 440, “Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars (ACI 440.1R-15),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2015, 88 pp.

6. De Luca, A.; Matta, F.; and Nanni, A., “Behavior of Full-Scale Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Columns under Axial Load,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 107, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2010, pp. 589-596.

7. Guérin, M.; Mohamed, H. M.; Benmokrane, B.; Shield, C. K.; and Nanni, A., “Effect of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement Ratio on Axial-Flexural Strength of Reinforced Concrete Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 4, July 2018, pp. 1049-1061. doi: 10.14359/51701279

8. AlAjarmeh, O. S.; Manalo, A. C.; Benmokrane, B.; Karunasena, W.; Ferdous, W.; and Mendis, P., “A New Design-Oriented Model of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Hollow Concrete Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 117, No. 2, Mar. 2020, pp. 141-156.

9. Choo, C. C.; Harik, I. E.; and Gesund, H., “Strength of Rectangular Concrete Columns Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 3, May-June 2006, pp. 452-459.

10. Tu, J.; Gao, K.; He, L.; and Li, X., “Experimental Study on the Axial Compression Performance of GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Square Columns,” Advances in Structural Engineering, V. 22, No. 7, 2018, pp. 1554-1565. doi: 10.1177/1369433218817988

11. Zhou, J.; He, X.; and Shen, W., “Compression Behavior of Seawater and Sea-Sand Concrete Reinforced with Fiber and Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 117, No. 4, July 2020, pp. 103-114.

12. Afifi, M. Z.; Mohamed, H. M.; and Benmokrane, B., “Axial Capacity of Circular Concrete Columns Reinforced with GFRP Bars and Spirals,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 18, No. 1, 2014, pp. 363-366. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000438

13. Hasan, H. A.; Karim, H.; Sheikh, M. N.; and Hadi, M. N. S., “Moment-Curvature Behavior of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bar-Reinforced Normal-Strength Concrete and High-Strength Concrete Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 4, July 2019, pp. 65-75. doi: 10.14359/51715573

14. Tobbi, H.; Farghaly, A. S.; and Benmokrane, B., “Behavior of Concentrically Loaded Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Columns with Varying Reinforcement Types And Ratios,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2014, pp. 375-385.

15. Kruschke, J., Doing Bayesian Data Analysis, second edition, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2015.

16. Dilger, W., and Neville, A. M., “Method of Creep Analysis of Structural Members,” Designing for Effects of Creep, Shrinkage and Temperature in Concrete Structures, SP-27, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1971, pp. 349-371.

17. Bazant, Z. P., “Prediction of Concrete Creep Effects Using Age-Adjusted Effective Modulus Method,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 69, No. 4, Apr. 1972, pp. 212-217.

18. Dilger, W. H., “Creep Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Structures Using Creep-Transformed Section Properties,” PCI Journal, V. 27, No. 1, 1982, pp. 98-119. doi: 10.15554/pcij.01011982.98.119

19. TRB, “Control of Cracking in Concrete: State of the Art,” Transportation Research Circular No. E-C107, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2006, 56 pp.

20. Kaklauskas, G., and Gribniak, V., “Eliminating Shrinkage Effect from Moment Curvature and Tension Stiffening Relationships of Reinforced Concrete Members,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 137, No. 12, 2011, pp. 1460-1469. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000395

21. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.

22. CEB, “Structural Effects of Time-Dependent Behaviour of Concrete (CEB Bulletin 215),” Comité Euro-International du Béton, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1993.

23. Tan, K. H., and Saha, M. K., “Long-Term Deflections of Reinforced Concrete Beams Externally Bonded with FRP System,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 10, No. 6, 2006, pp. 474-482. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:6(474)

24. Tavares, C. M. L.; Ribeiro, M. C. S.; Ferreira, A. J. M.; and Guedes, R. M., “Creep Behaviour of FRP-Reinforced Polymer Concrete,” Composite Structures, V. 57, No. 1-4, 2002, pp. 47-51. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00061-2

25. Sun, L.; Wei, M.; and Zhang, N., “Experimental Study on the Behavior of GFRP Reinforced Concrete Columns under Eccentric Axial Load,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 152, 2017, pp. 214-225. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.159

26. Zadeh, H. J., and Nanni, A., “Design of RC Columns Using Glass FRP Reinforcement,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 17, No. 3, 2013, pp. 294-304. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000354

27. ASCE/SEI 7-10, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2010.

28. Nowak, A. S., and Collins, K. R., Reliability of Structures, second edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013.

29. You, Y.-J.; Park, Y.-H.; Kim, H.-Y.; and Park, J.-S., “Hybrid Effect on Tensile Properties of FRP Rods with Various Material Compositions,” Composite Structures, V. 80, No. 1, 2007, pp. 117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.065

30. Okeil, A. M.; El-Tawil, S.; and Shahawy, M., “Flexural Reliability of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Girders Strengthened with Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Laminates,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 7, No. 5, 2002, pp. 290-299. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:5(290)

31. Kulkarni, S. N., “Calibration of Flexural Design of Concrete Members Reinforced with FRP Bars,” MS thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 200


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer