FRP Retrofitting and Non-Destructive Evaluation for Corrosion-Deteriorated Bridges in West Virginia

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: FRP Retrofitting and Non-Destructive Evaluation for Corrosion-Deteriorated Bridges in West Virginia

Author(s): Wael Zatar, Hai Nguyen, and Hien Nghiem

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 346

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 11-30

Keywords: concrete bridges; concrete imaging; deterioration; FRP composites; non-destructive testing and evaluation; structural rehabilitation; ultrasonic pulse-echo

DOI: 10.14359/51730490

Date: 1/1/2021

Abstract:
Many aging concrete bridges across the United States have exhibited severe deteriorations and in urgent need of rehabilitation, retrofitting or replacement. The deterioration is caused by a combination of factors including corrosion of reinforcing steel, freeze-thaw damage and chloride/water ingress. Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composite fibers, laminates, reinforcing bars and prestressed tendons have been successfully employed in civil infrastructure applications in the past three decades. The State of West Virginia has one of the highest percentages of structurally deficient bridges in the United States and this study covers a few case studies of the use of FRP composites for rehabilitating the State’s deficient bridges. Non-destructive ultrasonic pulse-echo testing is employed to map reinforcing rebars and detect delaminations of reinforced concrete slabs. A software, that employs the modified synthetic aperture focusing technique (SAFT) image reconstruction algorithm and signal processing, is developed to effectively visualize the reinforcing rebars and delaminations.

Related References:

1. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, American Society of Civil Engineers, http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/ (accessed Feb. 24, 2020).

2. Kim, Y.J., 2019, “State of the practice of FRP composites in highway bridges,” Engineering Structures, 179, pp.1-8.

3. Teng, J.G., Chen, J.F., Smith, S.T. and Lam, L., 2002, FRP: strengthened RC structures, Wiley.

4. Bakis, C.E., Bank, L.C., Brown, V., Cosenza, E., Davalos, J.F., Lesko, J.J., Machida, A., Rizkalla, S.H. and Triantafillou, T.C., 2002, “Fiber-reinforced polymer composites for construction—State-of-the-art review. Journal of composites for construction,” 6(2), pp. 73-87.

5. Büyüköztürk, O., Gunes, O. and Karaca, E., 2004, “Progress on understanding debonding problems in reinforced concrete and steel members strengthened using FRP composites,” Construction and Building Materials, 18(1), pp. 9-19.

6. Hollaway, L.C. and Teng, J.G. eds., 2008, Strengthening and rehabilitation of civil infrastructures using fibrereinforced polymer (FRP) composites, Elsevier.

7. Busel, J.P., 2016, Introduction to fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites in infrastructure, American Composites Manufacturers Association (ACMA).

8. Zatar, W., Nguyen, H., and Osman, O., 2018, Fiber‐Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Wraps for Next Generation Sustainable and Cost‐Effective Rehabilitation of Coastal Transportation Infrastructure in the Mid‐Atlantic Region, Final Report, the Mid-Atlantic Transportation Sustainability University Transportation Center (MATS UTC).

9. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 2014, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, USA.

10. Büyüköztürk, O., 1998, “Imaging of concrete structures,” NDT & E International, 31(4), pp. 233-243.

11. Popovics, J.S., Roesler, J.R., Bittner, J., Amirkhanian, A.N., Brand, A.S., Gupta, P. and Flowers, K., 2017, Ultrasonic imaging for concrete infrastructure condition assessment and quality assurance, Illinois Center for Transportation/Illinois Department of Transportation.

12. Bittner, J. and Popovics, J.S., 2017, “Ultrasonic analysis modifications for imaging of concrete infrastructure,” In 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), pp. 1-3.

13. Lin, S., Shams, S., Choi, H. and Azari, H., 2018, “Ultrasonic imaging of multi-layer concrete structures,” NDT & E International, 98, pp.101-109.

14. Flaherty, J.J., Erikson, K.R. and Van Lund, M., Magnaflux Corp, 1970, Synthetic aperture ultrasonic imaging systems, U.S. Patent 3,548,642.

15. Schickert, M., Krause, M. and Müller, W., 2003, “Ultrasonic imaging of concrete elements using reconstruction by synthetic aperture focusing technique,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 15(3), pp. 235-246.

16. Hoegh, K., and Khazanovich, L., 2015, “Extended synthetic aperture focusing technique for ultrasonic imaging of concrete,” NDT & E International, 74, pp. 33-42.