Seismically Robust Ultra-High-Performance Fiber- Reinforced Concrete Columns

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Seismically Robust Ultra-High-Performance Fiber- Reinforced Concrete Columns

Author(s): S.-H. Chao, M. Shamshiri, X. Liu, G. Palacios, A. E. Schultz, and A. Nojavan

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 118

Issue: 2

Appears on pages(s): 17-32

Keywords: buckling; column; deformation capacity; earthquake loading; seismic; ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC); ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHP-FRC)

DOI: 10.14359/51730391

Date: 3/1/2021

Abstract:
Ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHP-FRC) has a high compressive strength of 22 to 30 ksi (152 to 210 MPa) and a substantial shear strength as well as exceptional compressive ductility and confinement characteristics due to the addition of high-strength steel microfibers, which alleviate the need for excessive transverse reinforcement in high-strength concrete. The application of UHP-FRC in seismic-resistant reinforced concrete (RC) columns was investigated in this study. Two full-scale columns, one with normal strength concrete and the other with UHP-FRC in the plastic hinge region, were tested under simulated earthquake loads to evaluate their damage-resistance ability, deformation capacity, and failure mechanism. Experimental results show that the use of UHP-FRC changes the failure mode of RC columns as it improves confinement and shear capacity, as well as prevents concrete from crushing. The UHP-FRC column exhibits a higher peak strength and a greater deformation capacity before succumbing to significant strength degradation compared to the normal-strength RC column. The lateral displacements of the ACI 318-19-compliant RC column mainly result from distributed reinforcing bar yielding. Conversely, displacements of the UHP-FRC column are dominated by the slip deformation at the column-footing interface due to the strain penetration of the longitudinal reinforcing bars into the footing. Unlike the RC column, the failure of the UHP-FRC column is controlled by the low-cycle fatigue life of its longitudinal reinforcing bars. Concrete crushing in the RC column started at 1% drift ratio and became nearly unrepairable beyond 2.75% drift ratio. On the other hand, the UHP-FRC column experienced limited damage even at large drift ratios. This will result in great post-earthquake functionality and considerable cost savings in repairs for structures with UHP-FRC columns. In addition, incremental dynamic analyses of a four-story prototype RC moment frame indicate that buildings with UHP-FRC columns can sustain earthquakes with 20% higher peak ground acceleration before collapsing due to the greater deformation capacity.

Related References:

ACI Committee 318, 2019, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 624 pp.

ACI Committee 374, 2005, “Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary (ACI 374.1-05),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 9 pp.

ACI Committee 441, 1996, “Report on High-Strength Concrete Columns (ACI 441R-96),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1996, 13 pp.

ACI Innovation Task Group 4, 2007, “Report on Structural Design and Detailing for High-Strength Concrete in Moderate to High Seismic Applications (ACI ITG-4.3R-07),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2007, 3 pp.

Aghdasi, P.; Heid, A. E.; and Chao, S.-H., 2016, “Developing Ultra-High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete for Large-Scale Structural Applications,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 113, No. 5, Sept.-Oct., pp. 559-570. doi: 10.14359/51689103

Ahlborn, T.; Harris, D.; Misson, D.; and Peuse, E., 2011, “Characterization of Strength and Durability of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete under Variable Curing Conditions,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 2251, No. 1, pp. 68-75. doi: 10.3141/2251-07

Altoontash, A., 2004, “Simulation and Damage Models for Performance Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints,” PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Aviram, A.; Stojadinovic, B.; Parra-Montesinos, G. J.; and Mackie, K. R., 2010, “Structural Response and Cost Characterization of Bridge Construction Using Seismic Performance Enhancement Strategies,” PEER Report No. 2010/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

Choi, H.; Palacios, G.; Popovics, J. S.; and Chao, S.-H., 2018, “Monitoring Damage in Concrete Columns Using Ultrasonic Tomography,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 2, Mar., pp. 545-558. doi: 10.14359/51701117

Elwood, K. J., and Eberhard, M. O., 2009, “Effective Stiffness of Reinforced Concrete Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 106, No. 4, July-Aug., pp. 476-484.

FEMA, 2009, “Effects of Strength and Stiffness Degradation on Seismic Response,” FEMA P440A, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.

Haselton, C. B., and Deierlein, G. G., 2007, “Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforced Concrete Moment-Frame Buildings,” PEER Report 2007/08, PEER Center, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

Hung, C.-C., and Hu, F.-Y., 2018, “Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Slender Columns Strengthened with Steel Fibers under Concentric Axial Loading,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 175, pp. 422-433. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.201

Hung, C.-C.; Hu, F.-Y.; and Yen, C.-H., 2018, “Behavior of Slender UHPC Columns under Eccentric Loading,” Engineering Structures, V. 174, pp. 701-711. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.088

Ibarra, L. F.; Medina, R. A.; and Krawinkler, H., 2005, “Hysteretic Models That Incorporate Strength and Stiffness Deterioration,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, V. 34, No. 12, pp. 1489-1511. doi: 10.1002/eqe.495

Ichikawa, S.; Matsuzaki, H.; Moustafa, A.; ElGawady, M. A.; and Kawashima, K., 2016, “Seismic-Resistant Bridge Columns with Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete Segments,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 21, No. 9, p. 04016049 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000898

Mazzoni, S.; McKenna, F.; Scott, M. H.; and Fenves, G. L., 2009, “Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSEES),” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

Mehanny, S. S. F.; Kuramoto, H.; and Deierlein, G. G., 2001, “Stiffness Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Columns for Frame Analysis,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, No. 2, Mar.-Apr., pp. 215-225.

Moehle, J., 2015, Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, McGraw-Hill Education, 760 pp.

Nojavan, A.; Schultz, A. E.; Haselton, C.; Simathathien, S.; Liu, X.; and Chao, S.-H., 2015, “A New Data Set for Full-Scale Reinforced Concrete Columns under Collapse-Consistent Loading Protocols,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 31, No. 2, pp. 1211-1231. doi: 10.1193/040314EQS047

Sezen, H., and Moehle, J. P., 2006, “Seismic Tests of Concrete Columns with Light Transverse Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 842-849.

Shah, S. P., 1990, “Fracture Toughness for High-Strength Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 87, No. 3, May-June, pp. 260-265.

Shin, H. O.; Min, K. H.; and Mitchell, D., 2017, “Confinement of Ultra-High-Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete Columns,” Composite Structures, V. 176, pp. 124-142. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.022

Shin, H. O.; Yoon, Y. S.; Lee, S. H.; Cook, W. D.; and Mitchell, D., 2015, “Effect of Steel Fibers on the Performance of Ultrahigh-Strength Concrete Columns,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 27, No. 4, p. 04014142 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001091

Sugano, S.; Kimura, H.; and Shirai, K., 2007, “Study of New RC Structures Using Ultra-High-Strength Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (UFC)—The Challenge of Applying 200 MPa UFC to Earthquake Resistant Building Structures,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 5, No. 2, pp. 133-147. doi: 10.3151/jact.5.133

Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A., 2002, “Incremental Dynamic Analysis,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, V. 31, No. 3, pp. 491-514. doi: 10.1002/eqe.141

Vamvatsikos, D.; Jalayer, F.; and Cornell, C. A., 2003, “Application of Incremental Dynamic Analysis to an RC-Structure,” Proceedings, FIB Symposium on Concrete Structures in Seismic Regions, Athens, Greece, pp. 75-86.

Xu, S.; Wu, C.; Liu, Z.; Han, K.; Su, Y.; Zhao, J.; and Li, J., 2017, “Experimental Investigation of Seismic Behavior of Ultra-High Performance Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Columns,” Engineering Structures, V. 152, pp. 129-148. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.007

Zhou, Y.; Ou, Y.; Lee, G. C.; and O’Connor, J. S., 2008, “A Pilot Experimental Study on the Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Stainless Steel Rebars for Earthquake Engineering Applications,” University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 56 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer