Performance of Concrete Coupling Beams Subjected to Simulated Wind Loading Protocols—Phase II

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Performance of Concrete Coupling Beams Subjected to Simulated Wind Loading Protocols—Phase II

Author(s): Saman A. Abdullah, Kevin Aswegan, Ron Klemencic, and John W. Wallace

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 118

Issue: 3

Appears on pages(s): 101-116

Keywords: coupling beam; link beam; performance-based wind design (PBWD); reinforced concrete (RC); wind loading

DOI: 10.14359/51729356

Date: 5/1/2021

Abstract:
Wind design of buildings, unlike seismic design, is typically still based on prescriptive code provisions and essentially linear elastic response under ASCE 7 strength-level demands. This inconsistency in philosophy between seismic and wind design results in cases where wind loads control the design strength of the overall or some portion of the lateral system, resulting in significant flexural and/or axial overstrength and therefore greater capacities than needed to resist seismic demands—not only for energy-dissipating ductile elements and actions (fuses) but also for capacity-protected elements and actions. Although allowing modest nonlinearity in prescribed components (for example, coupling beams) in tall concrete buildings subjected to strong wind events is viewed as an attractive option, such an approach has been hampered in part by the lack of experimental data on the performance of key elements subjected to wind loading protocols. To address these issues, a two-phase research study was undertaken that involved testing eight 2/3-scale concrete coupling beams subjected to quasistatic, cyclic wind loading protocols. The focus of this article is on Phase II tests, which investigated the impact of loading protocol, type of coupling beam (reinforced concrete [RC] versus steel reinforced concrete beams) and epoxy injection repair. The test results indicated that, regardless of the type of loading protocol used, the beams performed well, with only minor residual cracks and no concrete crushing or spalling, or bar/steel section buckling or fracture.

Related References:

1. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

2. American Society of Civil Engineers, “Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-16),” ASCE, Reston, VA, 2016, 690 pp.

3. Ellingwood, B. R., “Acceptable Risk Bases for Design of Structures,” Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, V. 3, No. 2, 2001, pp. 170-179. doi: 10.1002/pse.78

4. Federal Emergency Management Agency, “Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Volume 1–Methodology (FEMA P-58-1),” Prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the FEMA, Washington, DC, 2012.

5. Paulay, T., and Binney, J. R., “Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams of Shear Walls,” Shear in Reinforced Concrete—Volume 1 and 2, SP-42, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, Jan. 1974, pp. 579-598.

6. Tassios, T. P.; Moretti, M.; and Bezas, A., “On the Coupling Behavior and Ductility of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams of Shear Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 93, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1996, pp. 711-720.

7. Naish, D.; Fry, A.; Klemencic, R.; and Wallace, J., “Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams—Part I: Testing,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2013, pp. 1057-1066.

8. Motter, C. J.; Fields, D. C.; Hooper, J. D.; Klemencic, R.; and Wallace, J. W., “Steel-Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams. II: Modeling,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 143, No. 3, 2016.

9. Abdullah, S.; Aswegan, K.; Jaberansari, S.; Klemencic, R.; and Wallace, J., “Performance of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams Subjected to Simulated Wind Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 117, No. 3, May 2020, pp. 283-295.

10. Abdullah, S.; Aswegan, K.; Klemencic, R.; and Wallace, J., “Experimental Study of Concrete Coupling Beams Subjected to Wind and Seismic Loading Protocols,” Report Number UCLA SEERL 2020/01, Submitted to Magnusson Klemencic Associates Foundation, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 2020, 268 pp.

11. AISC Committee 360, “Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-10),” American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, 2010.

12. AISC Committee 341, “Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-16),” American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, 2016.

13. Federal Emergency Management Agency, “Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings (FEMA 306),” Prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the FEMA, Washington, DC, 1998.

14. ACI Committee 503, “Specification for Crack Repair by Epoxy Injection (ACI 503.7-07),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2007, 7 pp.

15. ACI Committee 224, “Causes, Evaluation, and Repair of Cracks in Concrete Structures (ACI 224.1R-07),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2007, 22 pp.

16. ASCE/SEI Prestandard for PBWD. 2019.

17. Tauberg, N. A.; Kolozvari, K.; and Wallace, J. W., “Ductile Reinforced Concrete Coupled Walls: FEMA P695 Study,” Report Number UCLA SEERL 2019, University of California, Los Angeles, 2019.

18. Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council, “An Alternative Procedure for Seismic Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings Located in the Los Angeles Region,” LATBSDC, CA, 2017.

19. TBI, 2017, “Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings,” Tall Building Initiative, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.

20. Loporcaro, G., “A Least Invasive Method to Estimate the Residual Strain Capacity of Steel Reinforcement in Earthquake-Damaged Buildings,” PhD dissertation, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2017.

21. Zhao, S. D., and Ghannoum, W. M., “Setting Bar-Bending Requirements for High-Strength Steel Bars,” Report to Charles Pankow Foundation, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 2016.

22. Aswegan, K.; Larsen, R.; Klemencic, R.; Hooper, J.; and Hasselbauer, J., “Performance-Based Wind and Seismic Engineering: Benefits of Considering Multiple Hazards,” Proceedings, ASCE/SEI Structures Congress 2017, April 6-8, Denver, CO, ASCE, Reston, VA, 2017.

23. Poudel, A.; Lequesne, R.; and Lepage, A., “Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams: Effects of Axial Restraint,” SL Report 18-3, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 2018.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer