Title:
Contactless Ultrasonic Test System for Set Times of Mortar and Concrete
Author(s):
Quang Tran and Jeffery Roesler
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
118
Issue:
2
Appears on pages(s):
97-105
Keywords:
air-coupled ultrasonics; early-age concrete; leaky Rayleigh wave; non-destructive test; setting time
DOI:
10.14359/51729328
Date:
3/1/2021
Abstract:
The concrete final set time (tf) is influenced by the concrete mixture and ambient conditions. Rapid measurement in the laboratory or field is difficult because of wet sieving or access and device coupling limitations. A non-contact, one-sided ultrasonic testing system (UTS) has been developed to monitor leaky Rayleigh wave (LR-wave) signals emitting from the specimen surface with an array of non-contract microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) receivers. A new ultrasonic set time (tUS) parameter was defined based on the initiation time of the LR-wave energy curve. The UTS technique implemented in the laboratory determined the tUS of multiple mortar mixtures to be between 270 and 1335 minutes. The tUS for the mortars were consistent with tf by ASTM C403 penetration resistance when the transmitter’s incident angle was set at 12 degrees. Different incident angles (12 to 60 degrees) influence the signal quality and tUS. The non-contact UTS was deployed on three concrete pavement sections and produced tf of 210, 266, and 289 minutes.
Related References:
1. Mindess, S.; Young, J. F.; and Darwin, D., Concrete, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
2. ASTM C403-15, “Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Concrete Mixtures by Penetration Resistance,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
3. Taylor, P., and Wang, X., “Comparison of Setting Time Measured Using Ultrasonic Wave Propagation with Saw-Cutting Times on Pavements,” IHBR Project TR-675, National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 2014, 28 pp.
4. Tran, Q., and Roesler, J. R., “Noncontact Ultrasonic and Computer Vision Assessment for Sawcut Initiation Time,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, V. 146, No. 3, 2020, p. 04020055. doi: 10.1061/JPEODX.0000207
5. Garnier, V.; Corneloup, G.; Sprauel, J.; and Perfumo, J., “Setting Time Study of Roller Compacted Concrete by Spectral Analysis of Transmitted Ultrasonic Signals,” NDT & E International, V. 28, No. 1, 1995, pp. 15-22. doi: 10.1016/0963-8695(94)00006-6
6. Reinhardt, H., and Grosse, C., “Continuous Monitoring of Setting and Hardening of Mortar and Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 18, No. 3, 2004, pp. 145-154. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2003.10.002
7. Zhu, J.; Tsai, Y.-T.; and Kee, S.-H., “Monitoring Early Age Property of Cement and Concrete Using Piezoceramic Bender Elements,” Smart Materials and Structures, V. 20, No. 11, 2011, p. 115014. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/20/11/115014
8. Rapoport, J. R.; Popovics, J. S.; Kolluru, S. V.; and Shah, S. P., “Using Ultrasound to Monitor Stiffening Process of Concrete with Admixtures,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 97, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2000, pp. 675-683.
9. Chung, C.-W.; Suraneni, P.; Popovics, J. S.; and Struble, L. J., “Setting Time Measurement Using Ultrasonic Wave Reflection,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 109, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2012, pp. 109-118.
10. Ham, S., and Popovics, J. S., “Application of Contactless Ultrasound toward Automated Inspection of Concrete Structures,” Automation in Construction, V. 58, Oct. 2015, pp. 155-164. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.018
11. Soto-Bernal, J. J.; Vázquez, G. V.; González-Mota, R.; Rosales-Candelas, I.; Ortiz-Lozano, J. A.; and De-León-Martínez, H. A. J. A. O., “Optical Method to Characterize and Assess Setting Evolution of Cement Pastes,” Applied Optics, V. 59, No. 13, 2020, pp. D1-D5. doi: 10.1364/AO.59.0000D1
12. Choi, H.; Song, H.; Tran, Q. N.; Roesler, J. R.; and Popovics, J. S., “Contactless System for Continuous Monitoring of Early-Age Concrete Properties,” Concrete International, V. 38, No. 9, Sept. 2016, pp. 35-41.
13. Weng, X., and Yew, C. H., “The Leaky Rayleigh Wave and Scholte Wave at the Interface between Water and Porous Sea Ice,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, V. 87, No. 6, 1990, pp. 2481-2488. doi: 10.1121/1.399095
14. Seshadri, S., “Leaky Rayleigh Waves,” Journal of Applied Physics, V. 73, No. 8, 1993, pp. 3637-3650. doi: 10.1063/1.352922
15. Glass, N., and Maradudin, A., “Leaky Surface-Elastic Waves on Both Flat and Strongly Corrugated Surfaces for Isotropic, Nondissipative Media,” Journal of Applied Physics, V. 54, No. 2, 1983, pp. 796-805. doi: 10.1063/1.332038
16. Engan, H.; Ingebrigtsen, K.; and Tonning, A., “Elastic Surface Waves in α-Quartz: Observation of Leaky Surface Waves,” Applied Physics Letters, V. 10, No. 11, 1967, pp. 311-313. doi: 10.1063/1.1754825
17. Neuenschwander, J.; Schmidt, T.; Lüthi, T.; and Romer, M., “Leaky Rayleigh Wave Investigation on Mortar Samples,” Ultrasonics, V. 45, No. 1-4, 2006, pp. 50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.06.002
18. Zhu, J.; Popovics, J. S.; and Schubert, F., “Leaky Rayleigh and Scholte Waves at the Fluid–Solid Interface Subjected to Transient Point Loading,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, V. 116, No. 4, 2004, pp. 2101-2110. doi: 10.1121/1.1791718
19. Chung, C.-W.; Popovics, J. S.; and Struble, L. J., “Flocculation and Sedimentation in Suspensions Using Ultrasonic Wave Reflection,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, V. 129, No. 5, 2011, pp. 2944-2951. doi: 10.1121/1.3569730
20. Schafer, R. W., “What Is a Savitzky-Golay Filter,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, V. 28, No. 4, 2011, pp. 111-117. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2011.941097
21. Dahal, S.; Roesler, J.; Gupta, P.; and Zhang, Y., “Performance Monitoring of Re-Engineered CRCP Test Sections,” V. 2, Illinois Center for Transportation Research Report ICT-18-016, UILU-ENG-2020-2015, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 2020, 150 pp.