Title:
Standardizing Test to Quantify Chloride Threshold of Steel in Concrete
Author(s):
David Trejo, Naga Pavan Vaddey, and Ceki Halmen
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
118
Issue:
1
Appears on pages(s):
177-187
Keywords:
critical chloride threshold; instantaneous corrosion current density; macro-cell current density; open circuit potential
DOI:
10.14359/51728283
Date:
1/1/2021
Abstract:
The corrosion performance and service life of reinforced concrete systems exposed to chlorides are commonly assessed using the critical chloride threshold, Clcrit, which represents the chloride concentration required to initiate corrosion at the steel-concrete interface. There is a lack of consensus on an acceptable Clcrit value and this challenge is mainly attributed to the lack of a standard laboratory test method for quantifying Clcrit. This paper introduces a new test method, OCcrit, for quantifying Clcrit. A preliminary study was conducted to evaluate various aspects of the OCcrit test to develop an optimal corrosion test method. Results indicate that the measurement of open circuit potential (OCP) of the reinforcing steel using a Cu-CuSO4 electrode is a quick and reliable way to detect corrosion. Results also indicate that for the test specimens used in this study, a cyclic chloride exposure can be aggressive and can overestimate the chloride concentration at the steel surface needed for corrosion initiation.
Related References:
1. NACE International, “Highways and Bridges,” 2016, https://www.nace.org/Corrosion-Central/Industries/Highways-and-Bridges/.
2. Angst, U., “Challenges and Opportunities in Corrosion of Steel in Concrete,” Materials and Structures, V. 51, No. 4, 2018, 20 pp.
3. Abrams, D. A., “Tests of Impure Waters for Mixing Concrete,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 20, No. 2, Feb. 1924, pp. 442-486.
4. Shalon, R., and Raphael, M., “Influence of Sea Water on Corrosion of Reinforcement,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 55, No. 6, June 1959, pp. 1251-1268.
5. Hausmann, D. A., “Electrochemical Behavior of Steel in Concrete,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 61, No. 2, Feb. 1964, pp. 171-181.
6. Szilard, R., “Corrosion and Corrosion Protection of Tendons in Prestressed Concrete Bridges,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 66, No. 1, Jan. 1969, pp. 42-59.
7. Clear, K. C., “Time-to-Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel in Concrete Slabs, V. 3: Performance after 830 Daily Salt Applications,” Report No. FHWA-RD-76-70, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 1976, 64 pp.
8. Stratfull, R. F.; Jurkovich, W. J.; and Spellman, D. L., “Corrosion Testing of Bridge Decks,” Transportation Research Board, V. 539, 1975, pp. 50-59.
9. Pfeifer, D. W., and Scali, M. J., “Concrete Sealers for Protection of Bridge Structures,” National Cooperative Highway Research Board Program Report 244, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1981, 138 pp.
10. Martinez, S. L.; Darwin, D.; McCabe, S. L.; and Locke Jr., C. E., “Rapid Test for Corrosion Effects of Deicing Chemicals in Reinforced Concrete,” SL Report 90-4, The University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc., Lawrence, KS, 1990, 61 pp.
11. Balma, J.; Darwin, D.; Browning, J. P.; and Locke, C. E., “Evaluation of the Corrosion Resistance of Microalloyed Reinforcing Steel,” SM Report No. 71, The University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc., Lawrence, KS, 2005, 171 pp.
12. Thompson, N. G.; Lankard, D.; and Sprinkel, M., “Improved Grouts for Bonded Tendons in Post-Tensioned Bridge Structures,” FHWA Report No. RD-91-092, Cortest Columbus Technologies, 1992.
13. Hamilton III, H. R., “Investigation of Corrosion Protection Systems for Bridge Stay Cables,” PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 1995.
14. FM 5-522, “Florida Method of Test for An Accelerated Laboratory Method for Corrosion Testing of Reinforced Concrete using Impressed Current,” Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 2000.
15. ASTM G109-07, “Standard Test Method for Determining Effects of Chemical Admixtures on Corrosion of Embedded Steel Reinforcement in Concrete Exposed to Chloride Environments,” West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.
16. Trejo, D., and Pillai, R. G., “Accelerated Chloride Threshold Testing: Part I—ASTM A615 and A706 Reinforcement,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 100, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2003, pp. 519-527.
17. Berke, N. S.; Miltenberger, M. A.; Li, L.; Miller, B.; and Carvajal, R., “Accelerated Mortar Test Method to Determined Chloride Threshold Values,” Chloride Thresholds and Limits for New Construction, SP-308, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2015.
18. Moreno, F. J. P., and Moreno, E. I., “Effect of Fly ash and Silica fume on Time to Corrosion Initiation for Specimens Exposed Long term to Seawater,” Chloride Thresholds and Limits for New Construction, SP-308, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2015.
19. Pacheco, J., and Polder, R. B., “Critical Chloride Concentrations in Reinforced Concrete Specimens with Ordinary Portland and Blast Furnace Slag Cement,” HERON, V. 61, No. 2, 2016.
20. Life-365™, “Service life Prediction Model and Computer Program for Predicting the Service Life and Life-cycle Cost of Reinforced Concrete Exposed to Chlorides,” http://www.life-365.org/.
21. DuraCrete, final technical report, Document BE95-1347/R17, 2000.
22. Tang, L., “Engineering Expression of the ClinConc Model for Prediction of Free and Total Chloride Ingress in Submerged Marine Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 38, No. 8-9, 2008, pp. 1092-1097. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.03.008
23. Oslaković, S. I.; Bjegović, D.; and Mikulić, D., “Evaluation of Service Life Design Models on Concrete Structures Exposed to Marine Environment,” Materials and Structures, V. 43, No. 10, 2010, pp. 1397-1412. doi: 10.1617/s11527-010-9590-z
24. Trejo, D.; Shakouri, M.; and Vaddey, N. P., “The Need for Standardizing Testing of Input Variables for Reliable Service Life Prediction of Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Proceedings of an International Conference on Advances in Construction Materials and Systems, Chennai, India, 2017.
25. Angst, U.; Elsener, B.; Larsen, C. K.; and Vennesland, Ø., “Critical Chloride Content in Reinforced Concrete ‒ A Review,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 39, No. 12, 2009, pp. 1122-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.006
26. ASTM G109-07(2013), “Standard Test Method for Determining Effects of Chemical Admixtures on Corrosion of Embedded Steel Reinforcement in Concrete Exposed to Chloride Environments,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 6 pp.
27. Page, C. L., “Initiation of Chloride‐Induced Corrosion of Steel in Concrete: Role of the Interfacial Zone,” Materials and Corrosion, V. 60, No. 8, 2009, pp. 586-592. doi: 10.1002/maco.200905278
28. Isgor, O. B.; Angst, U.; Geiker, M.; Halmen, C.; Hansson, C.; Pacheco, J.; Tepke, D.; Trejo, D.; and Vaddey, N. P., “Recommended Practice for Reporting Experimental Data Produced from Studies on Corrosion of Steel in Cementitious Systems,” RILEM Technical Letters, V. 4, 2019, pp. 22-32. doi: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2019.90
29. ASTM C305-14, “Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 3 pp.
30. Kahrs, J. T.; Darwin, D.; and Locke, C. E., “Evaluation of Corrosion Resistance of Type 304 Stainless Steel Clad Reinforcing Bars,” University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc., Lawrence, KS, 2001.
31. ASTM C1152/C1152M-04(2012), “Standard Test Method for Acid-Soluble Chloride in Mortar and Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 4 pp.
32. ASTM C150/C150M-19a, “Standard Practice for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 10 pp.
33. ASTM A615/A615M-16, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 8 pp.
34. ASTM C876-15, “Standard Test Method for Corrosion Potentials of Uncoated Reinforcing Steel in Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 8 pp.
35. Alonso, M. C., and Sanchez, M., “Analysis of the Variability of Chloride Threshold Values in the Literature,” Materials and Corrosion, V. 60, No. 8, 2009, pp. 631-637. doi: 10.1002/maco.200905296
36. Kessler, S., and Gehlen, C., “Reliability Evaluation of Half-cell Potential Measurement using POD,” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, V. 23, No. 2, 2017, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000334
37. Choi, Y., and Yang, E., “Effect of Calcium Leaching on the Pore Structure, Strength, and Chloride Penetration Resistance in Concrete Specimens,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, V. 259, 2013, pp. 126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.02.049