Experimental Verification of ACI 318 Strut-and-Tie Method for Design of Deep Beams without Web Reinforcement

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Experimental Verification of ACI 318 Strut-and-Tie Method for Design of Deep Beams without Web Reinforcement

Author(s): R. Kondalraj and G. Appa Rao

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 118

Issue: 1

Appears on pages(s): 139-152

Keywords: deep beam; shear span-to-depth ratio; strut efficiency; strut-and- tie model

DOI: 10.14359/51728083

Date: 1/1/2021

Abstract:
This article presents an experimental investigation on 11 reinforced concrete (RC) deep beams without web reinforcement. Shear span depth ratio (a/d), beam depth, and percentage of tension reinforcement are the variables. Beams with a/d less than 1.5 could carry loads beyond the diagonal cracking of concrete due to the formation of a diagonal concrete strut. Diagonal cracking of deep beams with an a/d of 1.0 was observed at a load of approximately 20% of ultimate capacity. Further, 607 more RC deep beam experimental results were collected from the literature. Strut-and-tie model provisions of ACI 318-14 and ACI 318-19 were validated with a database of 618 RC deep beam results. The capacity of beams with a/d higher than 1.5, and concrete strengths higher than 60 MPa was overestimated by ACI 318-19 even after the reduction of strut efficiency factor from 0.6 to 0.4. However, the percentage overestimation by ACI 318-19 is within 5.0%. ACI 318-14 predicts the capacity more accurately than ACI 318-19 with a strut efficiency factor of 0.6, with only 6.0% of overestimation, if the maximum shear strength limit is considered. The maximum shear strength limit of ACI 318-14 is found to be highly conservative. The reduction of strut efficiency factor in ACI 318-19 without modifying maximum shear strength limit results in highly conservative estimations.

Related References:

1. Schlaich, J.; Schäfer, K.; and Jennewein, M., “Toward a Consistent Design of Structural Concrete,” PCI Journal, V. 32, No. 3, 1987, pp. 74-150. doi: 10.15554/pcij.05011987.74.150

2. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.

3. Collins, M., and Mitchell, D., Prestressed Concrete Structures, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991, 766 pp.

4. Tjhin, T. N., and Kuchma, D. A., “Computer-Based Tools for Design by Strut-and-Tie Method: Advances and Challenges,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 99, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2002, pp. 586-594.

5. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

6. Leung, K.; Ting, D.; and Looi, W., “Revisiting Unreinforced Strut Efficiency Factor,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2016, pp. 301-312.

7. Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 445, “Recent Approaches to Shear Design of Structural Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 124, No. 12, 1998, pp. 1375-1417. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:12(1375)

8. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-02) and Commentary (ACI 318R-02),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2002, 443 pp.

9. Reineck, K., ed., Examples for the Design of Structural Concrete with Strut-and-Tie Models, SP-208, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2002, 242 pp.

10. fib (Fédération Internationale de la Précontrainte/International Federation for Structural Concrete), FIB Commission 3 on Practical Design Working Group, “Practical Design of Structural Concrete,” fib, London, UK, Sept. 1999, 113 pp.

11. Quintero-Febres, C. G.; Parra-montesinos, G.; and Wight, J. K., “Strength of Struts in Deep Concrete Members Designed Using Strut-and-Tie Method,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 4, July-Aug. 2006, pp. 577-586.

12. Warwick, W., and Foster, S. J., “Investigation into the Efficiency Factor Used in Non-fiexural Member Design,” UNICN Report No. R-320 July 1993, School of Civil Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia, 81 pp.

13. Brown, M. D., and Bayrak, O., “Design of Deep Beams Using Strut-and-Tie Models—Part I: Evaluating U.S. Provisions,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 4, July-Aug. 2008, pp. 395-404.

14. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” seventh edition, AASHTO, Washington, DC, 2014.

15. Reineck, K., and Todisco, L., “Database of Shear Tests for Non-Slender Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrups,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2014, pp. 1363-1372. doi: 10.14359/51686820

16. Laughery, L., and Pujol, S., “Compressive Strength of Unreinforced Struts,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 5, 2015, pp. 617-624. doi: 10.14359/51687711

17. Klein, G. J.; Rezaei, N.; Garber, D.; and Tureyen, A. K., “Shear in Discontinuity Regions,” Concrete International, V. 41, No. 5, May 2019, pp. 36-41.

18. Lim, E., and Hwang, S.-J., “Modeling of the Strut-and-Tie Parameters of Deep Beams for Shear Strength Prediction,” Engineering Structures, V. 108, Feb. 2016, pp. 104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.024

19. fib (Fédération Internationale de la Précontrainte/International Federation for Structural Concrete), “Punching of Structural Concrete Slabs,” Technical Report fib Bulletin 12, fib, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2001, 307 pp.

20. Reineck, K. H.; Kuchma, D. A.; Kim, K. S.; and Marx, S., “Shear Database for Reinforced Concrete Members without Shear Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 100, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2003, pp. 240-249.

21. Zhang, N., and Tan, K. H., “Size Effect in RC Deep Beams: Experimental Investigation and STM Verification,” Engineering Structures, V. 29, No. 12, 2007, pp. 3241-3254. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.10.005

22. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards), “Metallic Materials—Tensile Testing: Part 1 Method of Test at Room Temperature (IS 1608:2018),” BIS, New Delhi, India, May 2005, 79 pp.

23. Tuchscherer, R., and Kettelkamp, J., “Estimating the Service-Level Cracking Behavior of Deep Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 3, May-June 2018, pp. 875-883. doi: 10.14359/51702045

24. Proestos, G. T.; Bentz, E. C.; and Collins, M. P., “Maximum Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2018, pp. 1463-1473. doi: 10.14359/51702252


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer