Title:
Assessment Study of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement Used in Two Concrete Bridges after More than 15 Years of Service
Author(s):
Ali F. Al-Khafaji, John J. Myers, and Antonio Nanni
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
117
Issue:
5
Appears on pages(s):
209-220
Keywords:
chloride content; durability; energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS); Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR); glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP); glass transition temperature (TA); pH; scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
DOI:
10.14359/51725980
Date:
9/1/2020
Abstract:
Corrosion in reinforced concrete (RC) represents a serious issue in steel-reinforced concrete structures; therefore, finding an alternative to replace steel reinforcement with a non-corrosive material is necessary. One of these alternatives is glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) that arises as not only a feasible solution but also economical. The objective of this study is to assess the durability of GFRP bars in concrete bridges exposed to a real-time weather environment. The first bridge is Southview Bridge (in Missouri) and its GFRP bars have been in service for more than 11 years; the second bridge is Sierrita de la Cruz Creek Bridge (in Texas State) and its GFRP bars have been in service for more than 15 years. To observe any possible mechanical and chemical changes in the GFRP bars and concrete, several tests were conducted on the GFRP bars and surrounding concrete of the extracted cores. Carbonation depth, pH, and chlorides content were performed on the extracted concrete cores to evaluate the GFRP-surrounding environment and see how they influenced certain behaviors of GFRP bars. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to observe any microstructural degradations within the GFRP bar and on the interfacial transition
zone (ITZ). Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was applied to check for any chemical elemental changes. In addition, glass transition temperature (TA) and fiber content tests were carried out to assess the temperature state of the resin and check any loss in fiber content of the bar after these years of service. The results showed that there were no microstructural degradations in both bridges. EDS results were positive for one of the bridges, and they were negative with signs of leaching and alkali-hydrolysis attack on the other. Fiber content results for both bridges were within the permissible limits of ACI 440 standard. Carbonation depth was found only in one of the bridges. In addition, there were no signs of chloride attack in concrete. This study adds new evidence to the validation of the long-term durability of GFRP bars as concrete reinforcement used in field applications.
Related References:
1. Mufti, A.; Onofrei, M.; Benmokrane, B.; and Banthia, N., “Report on the studies of GFRP durability in concrete from field demonstration structures,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Composites in Construction - CCC 2005, May 2014, 2005, pp. 11-13.
2. Wang, W., “Durability Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Polymer and Steel Reinforced Polymer for Infrastructure Applications.” Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 2017.
3. Achillides, Z., and Pilakoutas, K., “Bond Behavior of FRP Bars Under Direct Pullout Conditions,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 8, Apr. 2004, pp. 173-181. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:2(173)
4. El-Salakawy, E., and Benmokrane, B., “Concrete Bridge Barriers Reinforced with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 100, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2003, pp. 815-824.
5. Ahmed, E. A.; Benmokrane, B.; and Sansfaçon, M., “Case Study: Design, Construction, and Performance of the La Chancelière Parking Garage’s Concrete Flat Slabs Reinforced with GFRP Bars,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 21, No. 1, 2017, p. 05016001. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000656
6. Mohamed, H. M., and Benmokrane, B., “Design and Performance of Reinforced Concrete Water Chlorination Tank Totally Reinforced with GFRP Bars: Case Study,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 18, No. 1, 2014, p. 05013001. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000429
7. Manalo, A.; Benmokrane, B.; and Park, K.; and Lutze, D.,“Recent Developments on FRP Bars as Internal Reinforcement in Concrete Structures,” Concrete in Australia, V. 40, 2014, pp. 46-56.
8. Gooranorimi, O.; Bradberry, T.; Dauer, E.; Myers, J.; and Nanni, A., “FRP Reinforcement for Concrete: Performance Assessment and New Construction,” Vol 1, 2016.
9. Micelli, F., and Nanni, A., “Durability of FRP rods for concrete structures,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 18, No. 7, 2004, pp. 491-503. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.012
10. Porter, M., and Barnes, B., “Accelerated Durability of FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures,” 1st International Conference on Durability of Fiber Reinforced Polymer for Construction, 1998, pp. 191-202.
11. Nkurunziza, G.; Benmokrane, B.; Debaiky, A.; and Masmoudi, M., “Effect of Creep and Environment on Long-Term Tensile Properties of Glass FRP Reinforcing Bars,” 4th International Conference on Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2004.
12. Mufti, A.; Onofrei, M.; Benmokrane, B.; Banthia, N.; Boulfiza, M.; Newhook, J.; Bakht, B.; Tadros, G.; and Brett, P., “Durability of GFRP Reinforced Concrete in Field Structures.” Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures - FRPRCS-7, 2007, pp. 889-895.
13. Fico, R.; Galati, N.; Prota, A.; and Nanni, A, “Southview Bridge Rehabilitation in Rolla, Missouri,” 2006, 194 pp.
14. NCDC, “National Climatic Data Center,” Available at: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov.
15. NWSF, “National Weather Service Forecast,” Available at: http://www.weather.gov.
16. Grubb, J.; Limaye, H.; and Kakade, A., “Testing pH of Concrete: Need for a Standard Procedure,” Concrete International, V. 29, No. 4, Apr. 2007, pp. 78-83.
17. ASTM F710-08, “Standard Practice for Preparing Concrete Floors to Receive Resilient Flooring,” ASTM International, West Conshocken, PA, 2008, 6 pp.
18. Nanni, A.; De Luca, A.; and Zadeh, H., Reinforced Concrete with FRP Bars, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2014, 406 pp.
19. Sagues, A, “Carbonation in Concrete and Effect on Steel Corrosion,” Report No. WPI 0510685, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 1997, 266 pp.
20. RILEM. “CPC-18 Measurement of Hardened Concrete Carbonation Depth,” Materials and Structures, V. 21, No. 6, 1988, pp. 453-455. doi: 10.1007/BF02472327
21. Missouri University of Science and Technology, “Self-Consolidating Concrete (SCC) for Infrastructure Elements—Hardened Mechanical Properties and Durability Performance,” Report cmr 13-003, Rolla, MO, 2012, 959 pp.
22. Broomfield, J. P., Corrosion of Steel in Concrete, second edition, Taylor and Francis, London, UK, 2007, 294 pp.
23. Barkatt, A, “Issues in Predicting Long-Term Environmental Degradation of Fiber-reinforced Plastics.,” Environmental Effects on Engineered Materials, 2001, pp. 419-458.
24. Kamal, A. S. M., and Boulfiza, M., “Durability of GFRP Rebars in Simulated Concrete Solutions under Accelerated Aging Conditions,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 15, No. 4, 2011, pp. 473-481. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000168
25. Bank, L. C.; Puterman, M.; and Katz, A., “The Effect of Material Degradation of Bond Properties of FRP Reinforcing Bars in Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 95, No. 3, May-June 1998, pp. 232-243.
26. Robert, M.; Cousin, P.; and Benmokrane, B., “Durability of GFRP Reinforcing Bars Embedded in Moist Concrete,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 13, No. 2, 2009, pp. 66-73. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:2(66)
27. Epoxy Technology Inc, “Glass Transition Temperature for Epoxies,” http://www.epotek.com, 2012.
28. Nkurunziza, G.; Debaiky, A.; Cousin, P. B. B.; and Benmokrane, B., “Durability of GFRP Bars: A Critical Review of the Literature,” Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, V. 7, No. 4, 2005, pp. 194-209. doi: 10.1002/pse.205
29. Kumar, D. S.; Shukla, M. J.; Mahato, K. K.; Rathore, D. K.; Prusty, R. K.; and Ray, B. C., “Effect of Post-Curing on Thermal and Mechanical Behavior of GFRP Composites,” 4th National Conference on Processing and Characterization of Materials, 2015.
30. Benmokrane, B.; Nazair, C.; Loranger, M. A. M. A.; and Manalo, A., “Field Durability Study of Vinyl-Ester-Based GFRP Rebars in Concrete Bridge Barriers,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 23, No. 12, 2018, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001315
31. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2008, 471 pp.
32. Canadian Standards Association (CSA), “Specification for Fibre Reinforced Polymers, (CAN/CSA S807-10),” Rexdale, ON, Canada, 2010, 44 pp.
33. ASTM E1640-13, “Standard Test Method for Assignment of the Glass Transition Temperature by Dynamic Mechanical Analysis,” ASTM International, West Conshocken, PA, 2013, 6 pp.
34. Mohrig, J. R.; Hammond, C. N.; and Schatz, P. F., Techniques in Organic Chemistry, third edition, W.H. Freeman and Company, 2006, 468 pp.
35. Agarwal, B.; Broutman, L.; and Chandrashekhara, K., Analysis and Performance of Fiber Composites, third edition, Wiley, New York, 2015, 576 pp.
36. ASTM D2584-02, “Standard Test Method for Ignition Loss of Glass Strands and Fabrics 1,” ASTM International, West Conshocken, PA, 2002, 3 pp.
37. ASTM/D7957M-17, “Standard Specification for Solid Round Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshocken, PA, 2017, 5 pp.