Updating AASHTO Concrete Design Provisions - Prof. Mertz's Final Major Contribution to AASHTO LRFD

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Updating AASHTO Concrete Design Provisions - Prof. Mertz's Final Major Contribution to AASHTO LRFD

Author(s): John M. Kulicki and Gregg A. Freeby

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 340

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 1-18

Keywords: concrete bridge design, STM, disturbed beam regions, concrete anchors, beam ledges, node efficiency factors

DOI: 10.14359/51725803

Date: 4/1/2020

Abstract:
Dr. Dennis Mertz was involved with the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications [1] for 30 years. Starting with the original development of the specifications and continuing with maintenance and related course development and presentations. His last major contribution to the Specifications was to serve as Principal Investigator for the reorganization of Section 5, Concrete Structures. This presentation summarizes the changes to the structure of the Section including the increased emphasis on design of “B” and “D” regions of flexural members and introduces new and expanded material on beam ledges and inverted T-caps, shear and torsion, anchors, strut and tie modeling and durability. The product of this work was included in the 8th Edition of the Specifications as a complete replacement of Section 5.

Related References:

1. AASHTO. 2017. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., USA.

2. Birrcher, D. B., R. G. Tuchscherer, M. R. Huizinga, O. Bayrak, S. L. Wood, and J. O. Jirsa. “Strength and Serviceability Design of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams,” 2009. Report No. FHWA/TX-09/0-5253-1, Texas Department of Transportation

3. Schlaich, J., K. Schäfer, M. Jennewein. 1987. “Towards a Consistent Design of Structural Concrete,” PCI Journal.

Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, Vol. 32, No. 3, May–June 1987.

4. Collins, M. P., and D. Mitchell. 1991. Prestressed Concrete Structures. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

5. Martin, B. T., and D. H. Sanders. 2007. “Verification and Implementation of Strut-and-Tie Model in LRFD Bridge

Design Specifications,” NCHRP 20-07, Task 217.

6. Mitchell, D., and M. P. Collins. 2013. “Revision of Strut-and-Tie Provisions in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” NCHRP 20-07, Task 306.

7. Williams, C., D. Deschenes, and O. Bayrak. 2012. “Strut-and-Tie Model Design Examples for Bridges: Final

Report,” FHWA/TX-12/5-5253-01-1, Texas Department of Transportation.

8. Larson, N., E. F. Gómez, D. Garber, O. Bayrak, and W. Ghannoum. 2013. “Strength and Serviceability Design of Reinforced Concrete Inverted-T Beams,” FHWA/TX-13/0-6416-1, Texas Department of Transportation.

9. CEB. 2010. fip Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010. Comite Euro-International de Beton. Ernst and Sohn/John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

10. ACI Committee 318. 2014. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.

11. ACI Committee 355. 2007. Qualification of Post-Installed Mechanical Anchors in Concrete (ACI 355.2-07) and Commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.

12. ACI Committee 355. 2011. Qualification of Post-Installed Adhesive Anchors in Concrete (ACI 355.4-11) and Commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.

13. Cook, R. A., E. P. Douglas, T. M. Davis, and C. Liu. 2013. Long Term Performance of Epoxy Adhesive Anchor Systems, NCHRP Report 757, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC

14. ACI Committee 349. 2013. Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures (ACI 349-13) and Commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.

15. Shrivani, M., R. E. Klingner, H. L. Graves, III. 2004. Breakout Capacity of Anchors in Concrete – Part 1: Tension, ACI Structural Journal/November-December, Vol. 101, No. 6, pp. 912-820.

16. Braimah, A, E. Contestabile and R. Guilbeaur. 2009. Behavior of adhesive steel anchors under impulse-type loading. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 36(11).

17. Dickey, B. J.,T. K. Faller, S. K. Rosenbaugh, R. W. Bielenberg, K. A. Lechtenberg, and D. L. Sicking. 2012. Development of a Design Procedure for Concrete Traffic Barriers Attachments to Bridge Decks Utilizing Epoxy Concrete Anchors, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Nebraska Transportation Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.

18. ASCE. 2010. Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures, ASCE 7-88. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY.

19. Mirza, S.A., and Furlong, R.W. 1985. “Design of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Inverted T Beams for Bridge Structures,” PCI Journal. Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, July–August 1985.

20. AASHTO. 2010. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications, Third Edition with Interims, LRFDCONS-3-M. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

21. AASHTO. 2011. AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, 2nd Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

22. AASHTO. 2009. LRFD Guide Specifications for Design of Pedestrian Bridges, Second Edition, GSDPB-2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

23. AASHTO. 2018. The Manual for Bridge Evaluation, Second Edition with Interim, MBE-3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.