Effects of Interface Orientations on Bond Strength between Old Conventional Concrete and New Self-Consolidating Concrete

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Effects of Interface Orientations on Bond Strength between Old Conventional Concrete and New Self-Consolidating Concrete

Author(s): Xuhui Zhang, Sheng Zhang, Yuming Luo, and Lei Wang

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 117

Issue: 5

Appears on pages(s): 191-201

Keywords: bond strength; old-to-new concrete; self-consolidating concrete bonding interface orientation

DOI: 10.14359/51724673

Date: 9/1/2020

Abstract:
An experimental test was presented to study the effects of interface orientations on bond strength between old conventional concrete (CC) and new self-consolidating concrete (SCC). A total of 90 specimens were designed and tested using a direct shear test setup. The substrate CC was cast first and exposed to a carbonation chamber for the simulation of aged concrete. The new SCC was then cast on the aged concrete with different mold arrangements to simulate side, bottom, and top bonding interfaces. Effects of bonding interface orientation, concrete strength, and interface treatment on bond strength were clarified. Furthermore, the tested results were compared with the predictions of design codes to verify the applicability of design codes on the cases with different orientations of bonding interface. Results show that interface orientation significantly affects the bond strength between old CC and new SCC. Top bonding interface leads to highest bond strength, followed by side and bottom bonding interfaces. The average reductions of bond strength caused by side and bottom bonding interfaces, respectively, are 6% and 57% compared to top bonding interface.

Related References:

1. Li, Y.; Liu, X.; and Li, J., “Experimental Study of Retrofitted Cracked Concrete with FRP and Nanomodified Epoxy Resin,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 29, No. 5, 2017, p. 04016275. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001810

2. Meda, A.; Mostosi, S.; and Riva, P., “Shear Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beam with High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composite Jacketing,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2014, pp. 1059-1068. doi: 10.14359/51686807

3. Alvarez, J. C.; Breña, S. F.; and Arwade, S. R., “Nonlinear Backbone Modeling of Concrete Columns Retrofitted with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer or Steel Jackets,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 53-64. doi: 10.14359/51700779

4. Bournas, D. A., and Triantafillou, T. C., “Flexural Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Near-Surface-Mounted FRP or Stainless Steel,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 106, No. 4, July-Aug. 2009, pp. 495-505. doi: 10.14359/56615

5. Lee, S.-H.; Shin, K.-J.; and Kang, T. H. K., “Non-Iterative Moment Capacity Equation for Reinforced Concrete Beams with External Post-Tensioning,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2014, pp. 1111-1122. doi: 10.14359/51686815

6. Dai, L.; Bian, H.; Wang, L.; Potier-Ferry, M.; and Zhang, J., “Prestress Loss Diagnostics in Pre-Tensioned Concrete Structures with Corrosive Cracking,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 146, No. 3, 2020, p. 04020013. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002554

7. Tang, H.; Peng, J.; and Zhang, J., “Influence of Further Corrosion on Structural Behavior of Corroded Reinforced Concrete Beam Strengthened with Steel Plate Using Different Strengthening Schemes,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, V. 34, No. 2, 2020, p. 04019117. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001402

8. Thermou, G. E.; Pantazopoulou, S. J.; and Elnashai, A. S., “Flexural Behavior of Brittle RC Members Rehabilitated with Concrete Jacketing,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 133, No. 10, 2007, pp. 1373-1384. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:10(1373)

9. Zhang, X.; Luo, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Wu, W.; and Yang, C., “Flexural Strengthening of Damaged RC T-Beams Using Self-Compacting Concrete Jacketing under Different Sustaining Load,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 172, 2018, pp. 185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.245

10. Alghazali, H. H., and Myers, J. J., “Bond Performance of High-Volume Fly Ash Self-Consolidating Concrete (HVFA-SCC) in Full-Scale Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 161-170. doi: 10.14359/51706920

11. Makul, N., “Properties of Self-Consolidating Concrete with Rice Husk Ash and Calcium Carbonate Powder,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 115, No. 5, Sept. 2018, pp. 675-684. doi: 10.14359/51702344

12. Pedro, M. D. S., and Eduardo, N. B. S. J., “Factors Affecting Bond between New and Old Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 108, No. 4, July-Aug. 2011, pp. 449-456. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2011.04.014

13. Courard, L.; Piotrowski, T.; and Garbacz, A., “Near-to-Surface Properties Affecting Bond Strength in Concrete Repair,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 46, 2014, pp. 73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.11.005

14. Hu, C. L., and Li, Z. J., “Property Investigation of Individual Phases in Cementitious Composites Containing Silica Fume and Fly Ash,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 57, 2015, pp. 17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.011

15. He, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hooton, R. D.; and Zhang, X., “Effects of Interface Roughness and Interface Adhesion on New-to-Old Concrete Bonding,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 151, 2017, pp. 582-590. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.049

16. Júlio, E. N. B. S.; Branco, F. A. B.; and Silva, V. D., “Concrete-to-Concrete Bond Strength. Influence of the Roughness of the Substrate Surface,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 18, No. 9, 2004, pp. 675-681. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.023

17. Carles-Gibergues, A.; Saucier, F.; Grandet, J.; and Pigeon, M., “New-to-Old Concrete Bonding: Influence of Sulfates Type of New Concrete on Interface Microstructure,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 23, No. 2, 1993, pp. 431-441. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(93)90108-L

18. Liu, J.; Fang, J.-X.; Chen, J.-J.; and Xu, G., “Evaluation of Design Provisions for Interface Shear Transfer between Concretes Cast at Different Times,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 24, No. 6, 2019, p. 06019002. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001393

19. Diab, A. M.; Abd Elmoaty, A. E. M.; and Tag Eldin, M. R., “Slant Shear Bond Strength between Self-Compacting Concrete and Old Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 130, 2017, pp. 73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.023

20. Zemour, N.; Asadian, A.; Ahmed, E. A.; Benmokrane, B.; and Khayat, K. H., “Experimental Study on Splice Strength of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcing Bars in Normal and Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 116, No. 3, May 2019, pp. 105-118. doi: 10.14359/51714459

21. Pay, A. C.; Canbay, E.; and Frosch, R. J., “Bond Strength of Spliced Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2014, pp. 257-266. doi: 10.14359/51686519

22. El-Azab, M. A.; Mohamed, H. M.; and Farahat, A., “Effect of Tension Lap Splice on the Behavior of High Strength Self-Compacted Concrete Beams,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, V. 53, No. 2, 2014, pp. 319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2014.01.009

23. Chan, Y.-W.; Chen, Y.-S.; and Liu, Y.-S., “Development of Bond Strength of Reinforcement Steel in Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 100, No. 4, July-Aug. 2003, pp. 490-498. doi: 10.14359/12658

24. Chinese Standard, “Common Portland Cement (GB175-2007),” General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2007, 4 pp.

25. Santos, P., and Júlio, E. N., “Interface Shear Transfer on Composite Concrete Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 1, Jan. 2014, pp. 113-122. doi: 10.14359/51686543

26. Soltani, M., “Interface Shear Transfer in Reinforced Concrete Members: Code Evaluation, Modeling, and Testing,” PhD thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 2016.

27. González Fonteboa, B.; Martínez, F.; Carro, D.; and Eiras, J., “Shear Friction Capacity of Recycled Concretes,” Materiales de Construcción, V. 60, No. 299, 2010, pp. 53-67. doi: 10.3989/mc.2010.49708

28. Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Luo, Y.; Wang, L.; Peng, J.; and Zhang, J., “Interface Shear Strength between Self-Compacting Concrete and Carbonated Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 32, No. 6, 2020, p. 04020113. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003229

29. Chinese Standard, “Standard for Test Methods of Long-Term Performance and Durability of Ordinary Concrete (GB/T 50082-2009),” Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Construction of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2009, 62 pp.

30. Čairović, Đ.; Zlámal, M.; Štěpánek, P.; Trčka, T.; Škarvada, P.; and Macků, R., “Determination of Surface Roughness Parameters by Optical Profilometry and Sand Patch Test,” Solid State Phenomena, V. 259. 2017, pp. 15-20. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.259.15

31. Simon, T., “Sand Patch Method for Evaluation of Concrete-to-Concrete Interaction,” Concrete Structures, V. 4, 2003, pp. 67-71.

32. Chinese Standard, “Interface Treating Agent for Concrete (JC/T 907-2018),” Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2018, pp. 2-5.

33. Santos, P. M. D., and Júlio, E. N. B. S., “A State-of-the-Art Review on Shear-Friction,” Engineering Structures, V. 45, 2012, pp. 435-448. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.036

34. Costa, H.; Carmo, R. N. F.; and Júlio, E., “Influence of Lightweight Aggregates Concrete on the Bond Strength of Concrete-to-Concrete Interfaces,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 180, 2018, pp. 519-530. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.011

35. EN 1992-1-1, “Design of Concrete Structures–Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (Eurocode 2),” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004, 92 pp.

36. Canadian Standards Association (CSA), “Design of Concrete Structures for Buildings (CSA A23.3-14),” CSA Group, Rexdale, ON, Canada, 2014, 91 pp.

37. fib CEB-FIP, “fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010 (fib MC 2010),” International Federation for Structural Concrete, Berlin, Germany, 2010, 181 pp.

38. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2008, 473 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer