Ratios of Compressive Strengths of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Specimens of Different Shapes and Sizes

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Ratios of Compressive Strengths of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Specimens of Different Shapes and Sizes

Author(s): Philipp Riedel, Torsten Leutbecher, Siemon Piotrowski, and Christian Heese

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 116

Issue: 6

Appears on pages(s): 139-149

Keywords: compressive strength; conversion factor; cube; cylinder; guideline; strength class for concrete; strength test; ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC)

DOI: 10.14359/51716983

Date: 11/1/2019

Abstract:
So far, there has been a lack of generally applicable factors to convert between compressive strengths obtained in tests on ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) specimens of different shapes and sizes. Thus, a test program covering compression tests on 150 and 100 mm (6 and 4 in.) cylinders and cubes was initiated. For comparison reasons, ordinary-performance concrete (OPC), high-performance concrete (HPC), and UHPC mixtures without fibers were examined. The maximum aggregate size of the UHPC mixtures was 0.5, 3, 5, and 8 mm (0.020, 0.12, 0.20, and 0.31 in.), which covers the scope of application. The mean cylinder compressive strengths ranged between 30 and 200 MPa (4.35 and 29.0 ksi). Very small coefficients of variation of test results document high accuracy and validity obtained by standardized procedures throughout fabrication and testing. Compared with OPC and HPC, the effect of specimen’s geometry on the compressive strength is very small for UHPC.

Related References:

1. Schmidt, M.; Leutbecher, T.; Piotrowski, S.; and Wiens, U., “The German Guideline for Ultra-High Performance Concrete,” Proceedings of the AFGC-ACI-fib-RILEM International Conference on Ultra-High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete (held in Montpellier, France, Oct. 2017), RILEM Proceedings, PRO 106, V. II, RILEM Publications, Paris, France, 2017, pp. 545-554.

2. Fehling, E.; Schmidt, M.; Walraven, J.; Leutbecher, T.; and Fröhlich, S., Ultra-High Performance Concrete UHPC: Fundamentals – Design – Examples, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, Germany, 2014, 198 pp.

3. EN 206, “Concrete – Specification, Performance, Production and Conformity,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, Dec. 2013, 93 pp.

4. NF P18-470, “Concretes – Ultra-High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete – Specifications, Performance, Production and Conformity,” ANFOR, Paris, France, July 2016, 99 pp.

5. Gonnerman, H., “Effect of Size and Shape of Test Specimen on Compressive Strength of Concrete,” Proceedings of ASTM International, V. 25, 1925, pp. 237-250.

6. Price, W. H., “Factors Influencing Concrete Strength,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 47, No. 2, Feb. 1951, pp. 417-432.

7. Aïtcin, P.-C.; Miao, B.; Cook, W.; and Mitchell, D., “Effects of Size and Curing on Cylinder Compressive Strength of Normal and High-Strength Concretes,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 91, No. 4, July-Aug. 1994, pp. 349-354.

8. Gyengo, T., “Effect of Type of Test Specimen and Gradation of Aggregate on Compressive Strength of Concrete,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 33, No. 1, Jan. 1938, pp. 269-282.

9. Walz, K., “Gestaltfestigkeit von Betonkörpern,“ Schriftenreihe Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton, No. 122, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, Germany, 1957, 52 pp.

10. Bonzel, J., “Zur Gestaltsabhängigkeit der Betondruckfestigkeit,“ Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, V. 54, No. 9, Sept. 1959, pp. 223-228 and No. 10, Oct. 1959, 247-248.

11. Neville, A. M., “A General Relation for Strengths of Concrete Specimens of Different Shapes and Sizes,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 63, No. 10, Oct. 1966, pp. 1095-1109.

12. Held, M., “Research Results Concerning the Properties of High-Strength Concrete (HSC),” Darmstadt Concrete: Annual Journal on Concrete and Concrete Structures, V. 5, Institute for Structural Concrete, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany, 1990, pp. 71-78.

13. Kupfer, H.; Hilsdorf, K. H.; and Rüsch, H., “Behavior of Concrete under Biaxial Stresses,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 66, No. 8, Aug. 1969, pp. 656-666.

14. Bresler, B., and Pister, K. S., “Strength of Concrete Under Combined Stresses,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 30, No. 3, Sept. 1958, pp. 321-345.

15. Schickert, G., and Winkler, H., “Versuchsergebnisse zur Festigkeit und Verformung von Beton bei mehraxialer Druckbeanspruchung,“ Schriftenreihe Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton, No. 277, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, Germany, 1977, 123 pp.

16. Ansari, F., and Li, Q., “High-Strength Concrete Subjected to Triaxial Compression,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 95, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1998, pp. 747-755.

17. Hampel, T.; Speck, K.; Scheerer, S.; Ritter, R.; and Curbach, M., “High Performance Concrete under Biaxial and Triaxial Loads,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V. 135, No. 11, 2009, pp. 1274-1280. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:11(1274)

18. Curbach, M., and Speck, K., “Ultra High Performance Concrete under Biaxial Compression,” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete (held in Kassel, Germany, Mar. 2008), Structural Materials and Engineering Series, No. 10, Kassel University Press, Kassel, Germany, 2008, pp. 477-484.

19. Ritter, R., and Curbach, M., “Material Behavior of Ultra-High-Strength Concrete under Multiaxial Stress States,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 112, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2015, pp. 641-651. doi: 10.14359/51687663

20. Weibull, W., “A Statistical Theory of the Strength of Materials,” The Royal Swedish Institute for Engineering Research, No. 151, Generalstabens Litografiska Anstalts Förlag, Stockholm, Sweden, 1939, 45 pp.

21. Cheyrezy, M.; Maret, V.; and Frouin, L., “Microstructural Analysis of RPC (Reactive Powder Concrete),” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 25, No. 7, 1995, pp. 1491-1500. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00143-Z

22. Graybeal, B. A., and Davis, M., “Cylinder or Cube: Strength Testing of 80 to 200 MPa (11.6 to 29 ksi) Ultra-High-Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 105, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2008, pp. 603-609.

23. ASTM C109/C109M-16a, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 10 pp.

24. ASTM C39/C39M-18, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, 8 pp.

25. Fládr, J.; Broukalová, I.; and Bílý, P., “Determination of Conversion Factors for Compressive Strength of HPFRC Measured on Specimens of Different Dimensions,” Proceedings of the RILEM-fib-AFGC International Symposium on Ultra-High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete (held in Marseille, France, Oct. 2013), RILEM Proceedings, PRO 87, RILEM Publications, Bagneux, France, 2013, pp. 731-738.

26. Ma, J., “Faserfreier ultrahochfester Beton – Entwicklung und Materialeigenschaften,“ PhD thesis, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 2009, 254 pp.

27. Graybeal, B. A., “Material Property Characterization of Ultra-High Performance Concrete,” Report No. FHWA-HRT-06-103, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research, Development and Technology, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, Georgetown Pike, VA, 2006, 186 pp.

28. Ahlborn, T., and Kollmorgen, G., “Impact of Age and Size on the Mechanical Behavior of Ductal®,” Report No. CSD-2004-07, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 2004, 172 pp.

29. Schmidt, M.; Fehling, E.; Fröhlich, S.; and Thiemicke, J., eds., “Sustainable Building with Ultra-High Performance Concrete: Results of the German Priority Programme 1182 funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG),” Structural Materials and Engineering Series, No. 22, Kassel University Press, Kassel, Germany, 2014, 798 pp.

30. De Larrard, F.; Belloc, A.; Renwez, S.; and Boulay, C., “Is the Cube Test Suitable for High Performance Concrete?” Materials and Structures, V. 27, No. 10, 1994, pp. 580-583. doi: 10.1007/BF02473126

31. Fröhlich, S., and Schmidt, M., “Testing of Ultra-High Performance Concrete,” Structural Materials and Engineering Series, No. 22, Kassel University Press, Kassel, Germany, 2014, pp. 129-176.

32. Curbach, M., and Speck, K., “Zweiaxiale Druckfestigkeit von ultrahochfestem Beton,” Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, V. 102, No. 10, 2007, pp. 664-673. doi: 10.1002/best.200700573

33. EN 12390-1, “Testing Hardened Concrete – Part 1: Shape, Dimensions and Other Requirements for Specimens and Moulds,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, Sept. 2012, 13 pp.

34. EN 12350-5, “Testing Fresh Concrete – Part 5: Flow Table Test,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, Mar. 2009, 11 pp.

35. EN 12350-8, “Testing Fresh Concrete – Part 8: Self-Compacting Concrete – Slump-Flow Test,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, July 2010, 9 pp.

36. EN 1015-3, “Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry – Part 3: Determination of Consistence of Fresh Mortar (by flow table),” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, Dec. 2006, 10 pp.

37. EN 12390-3, “Testing Hardened Concrete – Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 2009, 19 pp.

38. EN 12390-4, Testing Hardened Concrete – Part 4: Compressive Strength – Specification for Testing Machines,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, Apr. 2000, 17 pp.

39. Riedel, P.; Leutbecher, T.; Piotrowski, S.; and Heese, C., “Einfluss der Probekörpergeometrie auf die Ergebnisse von Druckfestigkeitsprüfungen an ultrahochfestem Beton,” Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, V. 113, No. 8, 2018, pp. 598-607. doi: 10.1002/best.201800027


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer