Title:
Development of Rapid and Reliable Pozzolanic Reactivity Test Method
Author(s):
Mahipal Kasaniya, Michael D. A. Thomas, and Edward G. Moffatt
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
116
Issue:
4
Appears on pages(s):
145-154
Keywords:
ASTM C618; bound water; compressive strength; lime reactivity; natural pozzolans; pozzolanic reactivity; strength activity index; thermogravimetric analysis
DOI:
10.14359/51716718
Date:
7/1/2019
Abstract:
With the potential decline in supplies of today’s most widely used supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as fly ash and slag, there is growing interest in the use of natural pozzolans (for example, pumice, volcanic ash), processed pozzolans (for example, calcined clays and shales), and manufactured pozzolans (for example, ground glass). Establishing the pozzolanic reactivity of these materials is an essential part of the evaluation process. Currently, pozzolans are assessed using ASTM C618 and C311, with the strength activity test being the only real performance indicator. Unfortunately, it is not possible to accurately determine the contribution of the pozzolanic reactivity to the strength in this test. This paper presents the development of a new pozzolanic reactivity test method based on the previous strength-activity-with-lime test but modified to increase the rate of the pozzolanic reaction. In this test, the solution-to-binder ratio is kept constant with workability adjusted using chemical admixtures. A range of mixing solutions containing combinations of KOH, NaOH, and K2SO4 and various curing regimes were investigated. The outcome of the test is compared with results from the current ASTM C311 and CSA A3004-E1 test methods for a wide range of pozzolanic (and inert) materials.
Related References:
1. Newman, J., and Choo, B. S., “Cementitious Materials,” Advanced Concrete Technology 1, first edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2013.
2. Thomas, M. D. A., Supplementary Cementing Materials in Concrete, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013.
3. Tokyay, M., Cement and Concrete Mineral Admixtures, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2016.
4. Bapat, J. D., Mineral Admixtures in Cement and Concrete, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2017.
5. Lorenz, W., “The Use of Volcanic Rocks as Construction Raw Material,” Natural Resources and Development, V. 22, 1985, pp. 7-24.
6. Rodríguez-Camacho, R. E., and Uribe-Afif, R., “Importance of Using the Natural Pozzolans on Concrete Durability,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 32, No. 12, 2002, pp. 1851-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00714-1
7. Kaid, N.; Cyr, M.; Julien, S.; and Khelafi, H., “Durability of Concrete Containing a Natural Pozzolan as Defined by a Performance-Based Approach,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 23, No. 12, 2009, pp. 3457-3467. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.002
8. Siddique, R., and Klaus, J., “Influence of Metakaolin on the Properties of Mortar and Concrete: A Review,” Applied Clay Science, V. 43, No. 3-4, 2009, pp. 392-400. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2008.11.007
9. ACI Committee 232, “Report on the Use of Raw or Processed Natural Pozzolans in Concrete (ACI 232.1R-12),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2012, 29 pp.
10. Paiva, H.; Silva, A. S.; Velosa, A.; Cachim, P.; and Ferreira, V. M., “Microstructure and Hardened State Properties on Pozzolan-Containing Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 140, 2017, pp. 374-384. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.120
11. Hanna, K. M., and Afify, A., “Evaluation of the Activity of Pozzolanic Materials,” Journal of Applied Chemistry & Biotechnology, V. 24, No. 12, 1974, pp. 751-757. doi: 10.1002/jctb.5020241206
12. Tironi, A.; Trezza, M. A.; Scian, A. N.; and Irassar, E. F., “Assessment of Pozzolanic Activity of Different Calcined Clays,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 37, 2013, pp. 319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.01.002
13. Frattini, N., “Ricerche Sulla Calce di Idrolisi Nelle Paste di Cemento,” Annali di Chimica, V. 39, 1949, pp. 616-620.
14. ASTM C311/C311M-16, “Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Fly Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Portland-Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 10 pp.
15. ASTM C618-17, “Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 5 pp.
16. CSA A3004-E1, “Standard Practice for the Evaluation of Alternative Supplementary Cementing Materials (ASCMs) for use in Concrete,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2013.
17. Donatello, S.; Tyrer, M.; and Cheeseman, C. R., “Comparison of Test Methods to Assess Pozzolanic Activity,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 32, No. 2, 2010, pp. 121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.008
18. Pourkhorshidi, A. R.; Najimi, M.; Parhizkar, T.; Hillemeier, B.; and Herr, R., “A Comparative Study of the Evaluation Methods for Pozzolans,” Advances in Cement Research, V. 22, No. 3, 2010, pp. 157-164. doi: 10.1680/adcr.2010.22.3.157
19. Gava, G. P., and Prudencio, L. R., Jr., “Pozzolanic Activity Tests as a Measure of Pozzolans Performance, Part 1,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 59, No. 10, 2007, pp. 729-734. doi: 10.1680/macr.2007.59.10.729
20. Gava, G., and Prudêncio, L. R. P., Jr., “Pozzolanic Activity Tests as a Measure of Pozzolans’ Performance, Part 2,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 59, No. 10, 2007, pp. 735-741. doi: 10.1680/macr.2007.59.10.735
21. Malhotra, V. M., “Cement and Concrete Admixtures for High-Performance Concrete: ASTM and ACI Specifications and Standards,” International Congress on High-Performance Concrete, and Performance and Quality of Concrete Structures, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Politechnical School of São Paulo University, and Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Florianópolis, 1996, pp. 599-605.
22. Sybertz, F., “Comparison of Different Methods for Testing the Pozzolanic Activity of Fly Ashes,” Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, SP-114, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1989, pp. 477-497.
23. Snellings, R., and Scrivener, K. L., “Rapid Screening Tests for Supplementary Cementitious Materials: Past and Future,” Materials and Structures, V. 49, No. 8, 2016, pp. 3265-3279. doi: 10.1617/s11527-015-0718-z
24. Pourkhorshidi, A. R.; Najimi, M.; Parhizkar, T.; Jafarpour, F.; and Hillemeier, B., “Applicability of the Standard Specifications of ASTM C618 for Evaluation of Natural Pozzolans,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 32, No. 10, 2010, pp. 794-800. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.08.007
25. Bentz, P. D.; Duran-Herrera, A.; and Galvez-Moreno, D., “Comparison of ASTM C311 Strength Activity Index Testing vs. Testing Based on Constant Volumetric Proportions,” Journal of ASTM International, V. 9, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1-7.
26. ASTM C1437-15, “Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 2 pp.
27. ASTM C109-16, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 10 pp.
28. ASTM C305-14, “Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 3 pp.
29. Walker, R., and Pavia, S., “Physical Properties and Reactivity of Pozzolans, and Their Influence on the Properties of Lime–Pozzolan Pastes,” Materials and Structures, V. 44, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1139-1150. doi: 10.1617/s11527-010-9689-2
30. Avet, F.; Snellings, R.; Alujas Diaz, A.; Ben Haha, M.; and Scrivener, K., “Development of a New Rapid, Relevant and Reliable (R3) Test Method to Evaluate the Pozzolanic Reactivity of Calcined Kaolinitic Clays,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 85, 2016, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.015
31. ASTM C642-13, “Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 3 pp.
32. Canham, I.; Page, C. L.; and Nixon, J. P., “Aspects of the Pore Solution Chemistry of Blended Cements Related to the Control of Alkali Silica Reaction,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 17, No. 5, 1987, pp. 839-844. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(87)90046-9