Cyclic Loading Behavior of CFRP-Wrapped Non-Ductile Beam-Column Joints

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Cyclic Loading Behavior of CFRP-Wrapped Non-Ductile Beam-Column Joints

Author(s): Ali S. H. Zerkane, Yasir M. Saeed, and Franz N. Rad

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 331

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 34-54

Keywords: durability of concrete, cyclic loading, retrofit, CFRP, non-ductile, beam-column joints

DOI: 10.14359/51715592

Date: 2/1/2019

Abstract:
Use of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) material has served as a proper solution to overcome the weakness of concrete members caused by substandard design, changes in the load distribution, or to correct the weakness of concrete structures subjected to hostile weather conditions. Concrete beam-column joints designed and constructed before 1970s were characterized by weak joints. Lack of transverse reinforcement within the joint reign, hence lack of ductility in the joints could be one of the main reasons that many concrete buildings have failed during earthquakes around the world. In the present work, carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets were used as Externally Bonded FRP System to compensate for the lack of transverse reinforcement in the beam-column joints in order to retrofit the joint region and to transfer the failure to the concrete beams. Six specimens of approximately one-third scale were designed, constructed, and tested. A new technique of rehabilitation scheme is proposed for retrofitting. The scheme proved to be effective in improving the behavior of non-ductile beam-column joints, and to change the final mode of failure. The comparison between beam-column joints before and after retrofitting is presented by load versus deflection, load versus CFRP strain, energy dissipation, and ductility.

Related References:

1. ACI Committee 318, 2014, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, ACI 318-14, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.

2. Engindeniz, M., Kahn, L. F., and Abdul-Hamid, Z., 2005, “Repair and Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints: State of Art,” ACI Structural Journal, V.102, No. 2, 187-197.

3. Biddah, A., Ghobarah, A., and Aziz, T.S., 1997, "Upgrading of Nonductile Reinforced Concrete Frame Connections." Journal of Structural Engineering, V. 123, No. 8, pp. 1001-1010, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:8(1001).

4. Hakuto, S., Park, R., and Tanaka, H., 2000, “Seismic Load Tests on Interior and Exterior Beam-Column Joints with Substandard Reinforcing Details,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 97, No. 1, pp. 11-25.

5. Li, J., Bakoos, S., Samali, B., and Ye, L., 1999, “Reinforcement of Concrete Beam-Column Connections with Hybrid FRP Sheet,” Composite Structures, V. 47, pp. 805-812.

6. Park, R. and Paulay, T., 1973, "Behavior of Reinforced Concrete External. Beam-Column Joints under Cyclic Loading", In Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, Italy, pp.772-781.

7. ACI Committee 318, 1971, Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete, ACI 318-71, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI.

8. CSA, 1994, Design of Concrete Structures, CAN/CSA A23.3-94, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada.

9. Prota, A., Nanni, A., Manfredi, G., and Cosenza, E., 2000, “Seismic Upgrade of Beam-Column Joints with FRP Reinforcement,” L’Industria Italiana del Cemento, V. LXX, No. 11, pp. 868-877. (in English and Italian).

10. ACI Committee 318, 1963, Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete, ACI 318-63, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI.

11. Ghobarah, A., and Said, A., 2001, “Seismic Rehabilitation of Beam-Column Joint Using FRP Laminates,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, V. 5, pp. 113-129.

12. El-Amoury, T. and A. Ghobarah, 2002, “Seismic Rehabilitation of Beam-Column Joint Using GFRP Sheets,” Engineering Structures, V. 24, No. 11, pp. 1397-1407.

13. Ghobarah, A., and Said, A., 2002, “Shear Strengthening of Beam-Column Joint,” Journal of Engineering Structures, V. 24, No. 1, pp. 881-888.

14. Ghobarah, A., and El-Amoury, T., 2005, “Seismic Rehabilitation of Deficient Exterior Concrete Frame Joints,” Journal of Composites for Construction, V. 9, No. 5, pp. 408-416.

15. Mukherjee, A., and Joshi, M., 2005, “FRPC Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints under Cyclic Excitation,” Composite structures, V. 70, No. 2, pp. 185-199.

16. ASTM Standard C39 / C39M, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2005.

17. ASTM Standard C78, 2008, Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading), ASTM C78-08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

18. ACI Committee 440, 2017, Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures, ACI 440.2R-17, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.

19. ASTM Standard D3039/ D3039M, 2008, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials, ASTM D3039/ D3039M-08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

20. ASTM Standard D7565/ D7565M, 2010, Standard Test Method for Determining Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites Used for Strengthening of Civil Structures, ASTM D7565/ D7565M-10, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

21. Revathi R., and Srisanthi, V. G., 2014, “Flexural Behaviour of Interior R.C. Beam Column Joint with and without Slab under Cyclic Loading,” International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, V. 3, No. 6, pp. 558-568.