Strut Strength and Failure in Full-Scale Concrete Deep Beams

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Strut Strength and Failure in Full-Scale Concrete Deep Beams

Author(s): Nazanin Rezaei, Gary Klein, and David B. Garber

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 116

Issue: 3

Appears on pages(s): 65-74

Keywords: deep beams; failure mode; node behavior; strut-and-tie method; strut strength

DOI: 10.14359/51713306

Date: 5/1/2019

Abstract:
There has been some recent debate about the actual behavior and performance of some components of strut-and-tie models, specifically struts. This research aims to shed additional light on the behavior and performance of struts. Five full-scale concrete deep beams with two different shapes (rectangular and truss-like) were tested under a three-point load setup. The shear span-to-effective depth ratio (a/d) for the specimens were 1 and 1.6, which led to strut angles of 30 and 45 degrees. All the specimens were simply supported vertically and reinforced with bonded or unbonded bars horizontally. The results indicate that the truss-like specimens have substantially more capacity compared to the rectangular specimens with similar dimension. The unbonded reinforced beam results were similar to bonded results. The ultimate shear strength obtained from the experimental tests was compared with strut-and-tie method (STM) estimates using current design codes to evaluate their safety and accuracy.

Related References:

ACI Committee 215, 1992, “Considerations for Design of Concrete Structures Subjected to Fatigue Loading (ACI 215R-92),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 24 pp.

ACI Committee 318, 2014, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (ACI 318-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 519 pp.

American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 1989, Guide Specifications for Design and Construction of Segmental Concrete Bridges, first edition, Washington, DC.

American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2017, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification, eighth edition, Washington, DC.

Breen, J. E.; Burdet, O.; Roberts, C.; Sanders, D.; and Wollmann, G., 1994, “Anchorage Zone Reinforcement for Post-Tensioned Concrete Girders,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report No. 356, Washington, DC.

Brown, M. D., and Bayrak, O., 2006, “Minimum Transverse Reinforcement for Bottle-Shaped Struts,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 813-821.

Brown, M. D.; Sankovich, C.; Bayrak, O.; and Jirsa, J. O., 2006, “Behavior and Efficiency of Bottle-Shaped Struts,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 3, May-June, pp. 348-354.

CEB-FIP, 2010, “CEP-FIP Model Code,” Comité Euro-International du Béton, International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib), Lausanne, Switzerland.

CEN, 2004, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 229 pp.

Cook, W. D., and Mitchell, D., 1988, “Studies of Disturbed Regions near Discontinuities in Reinforced Concrete Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 85, No. 2, Mar.-Apr., pp. 206-216.

CSA A23.3-14, 1994, “Design of Concrete Structures for Buildings with Explanatory Notes,” Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, ON, Canada.

FIP Recommendations, 1999, “FIP-Commission 3: Practical Design,” SETO, London, UK, Sept., http://www.fib-international.org.

Klein, G.; Rezaei, N.; Garber, D.; and Tureyen, K., 2019, “Shear in Discontinuity Regions,” Concrete International, V. 41, No. 5, May.

Mörsch, E., 1909, Concrete-Steel Construction, E. P. Goodrich, translation McGraw-Hill, New York, 1909, 368 pp.

Paskova, T., and Meyer, C., 1997, “Low-Cycle Fatigue of Plain and Fiber-Reinforced Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 94, No. 4, July-Aug., pp. 273-286.

Pujol, S.; Rautenberg, J.; and Sozen, M., 2011, “Compressive Strength of Concrete in Nonprismatic Elements,” Concrete International, V. 33, No. 9, Sept., pp. 42.

Rezaei, N.; Klein, G.; and Carber, D., 2019, “Effect of Development and Geometry on Behavior of Concrete Deep Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 3, May, pp. 171-182. doi:10.143591/51713308

Ritter, W., 1899, “Die Bauweise Hennebique (Construction Techniques of Hennebique),” Schweizerische Bauzeitung, V. 33, No. 7.

Sahoo, D. K.; Singh, B.; and Bhargava, P., 2009, “An Appraisal of the ACI Strut Efficiency Factors,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 61, No. 6, pp. 445-456. doi: August.10.1680/macr.2008.00112

Sahoo, D. K.; Singh, B.; and Bhargava, P., 2010, “Effect of Inclination on the Strength of Struts,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 63, No. 2, pp. 111-117. doi: 10.1680/macr.9.00178

Schlaich, J., and Schäfer, K., 1991, “Design and Detailing of Structural Concrete Using Strut-And-Tie Models,” Structural Engineering, V. 69, No. 6, pp. 113-125.

Schlaich, J.; Schäfer, K.; and Jennewein, M., 1987, “Special Report: Toward a Consistent Design of Structural Concrete,” Prestressed Concrete Institute Journal, V. 32, No. 3, May-June, pp. 74-150.

Su, R., and Looi, D., 2016, “Revisiting Unreinforced Strut Efficiency Factor,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 2, Mar.-Apr., pp. 301-312.

Van den Hoogen, M.; Hordijk, D.; Blom, K.; and Vergoossen, R., 2015, “The Increasing Bearing Capacity while Removing Concrete from Reinforced Beams,” Concrete—Innovation and Design, fib Symposium, Copenhagen, Denmark, May.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer