Title:
Considerations of Sustainability in the Mixture Proportioning of Concrete for Strength and Durability
Author(s):
Ravindra Gettu, Radhakrishna G. Pillai, Jyotiprakash Meena, Anusha S. Basavaraj, Manu Santhanam, and B.S. Dhanya
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
326
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
5.1-5.10
Keywords:
concrete, durability, energy, emissions, eco-efficiency indicators, life cycle assessment, SCM, sustainability
DOI:
10.14359/51710975
Date:
8/10/2018
Abstract:
The mixture proportioning of concrete for sustainability should consider four aspects, without sacrificing affordability: the lowering of the carbon dioxide emissions; the minimization of raw materials required; reduction of energy demand during manufacturing and construction; and the longevity of the structure or other applications. Taking a set of concretes with different binders, including ordinary portland cement (OPC), fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), sustainability is assessed using different types of indicators including those that take into account the binder and clinker content, compressive strength, carbon footprint and energy demand. A new set of indicators called A-indices has been proposed for combining the influence of carbon dioxide emissions obtained from life cycle assessment (LCA) and durability parameter that relate to the service life of a structure. Here, this concept is illustrated by obtaining a parameter based on the chloride migration coefficient of the concrete. It is proposed that the decision-making process for sustainable concrete be made by minimizing both the A-index and the energy intensity, defined as the energy demand for a unit volume of concrete and unit performance parameter, such as 1 MPa of 1-year compressive strength. The best concretes considered here come out as those with ternary binders having 40% of the OPC replaced by a combination of GGBS and FA.
Related References:
1. Scrivener, K.L., John, V.M., and Gartner, E.M., Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry, United Nations Environment Programme – Sustainable Building and Climate Initiative (UNEP-SBCI) Report, 2017, 64 p, United Nations Environment, Paris, http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/25281.
2. Habert, G. and Roussel, N., “Study of two concrete mix design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives”, Cement & Concrete Composites, V. 31, 2009, pp. 397-402.
3. Van den Heede, P., and De Belie, N., “Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and 'green' concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations”, Cement & Concrete Composites, V. 34, No. 4, 2012, pp. 431-442.
4. Müller, H.S., Haist, M., and Vogel, M., “Assessment of the sustainability potential of concrete and concrete structures considering their environmental impact, performance and life time”, Construction and Building Materials, V. 67, 2014, pp. 321-337.
5. Muigai, R., Alexander, M., and Moyo, P., “A novel framework towards the design of more sustainable concrete infrastructure”, Materials and Structures, V. 49, 2016, pp. 1127-1141.
6. Panesar, D. K., Seto, K.E. and Churchill, C.J., “Impact of the selection unit on the life cycle assessment of green concrete”, Intnl. J. of Life-cycle Assessment, V. 22, 2017, pp. 1969-86. 7. Damineli, B.L., Kemeid, F.M., Aguiar, P.S., and John, V.M., “Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use”, Cement & Concrete Composites, V. 32, 2010, pp. 555-562.
8. Dhanya, B.S., “Study of the influence of supplementary cementitious materials on selected durability parameters of Concrete”, Ph.D Thesis, 2015, IIT Madras, Chennai, India. 9. ISO, Environmental management. life cycle assessment: requrirements and guidelines. ISO 14040:2006, International Organisation for Standardization. 10. Gettu, R., Prakasan, S., Patel, A., Rathi, V., Nagrath, K., Palaniappan, S., and Maity, S., „Process Mapping and Preliminary Assessment of Energy Consumption in Indian Cement Plants, Expanding Boundaries: Systems Thinking in the Built Environment“, Proc. Sustainable Built Environment (SBE) Regional Conference Zurich 2016, Eds. G. Habert and A. Schlueter, vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, Switzerland, ISBN: 978-3-7281-3774-6 (ebook), Open Access Online Publication, pp. 430-435. 11. Gettu, R., Patel, A., Rathi, V., Prakasan, S., Basavaraj, A.S., and Maity, S., „Sustainability Assessment of Cements and Concretes in the Indian Context: Influence of Supplementary Cementitious Materials“, Proc. Fourth Intnl. Conf. on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies (SCMT4) (Las Vegas, USA), Eds. N. Ghafoori, P. Claisse, E. Ganjian and T.R. Naik, paper S299, 2016, pp. 1142-1150. doi: 10.3218/3774-6
12. Sangoju, B., Pillai, R.G., Gettu, G., Bharatkumar, B.H., and Iyer, N.R., “Use of portland pozzolana cement to enhance the service life of reinforced concrete exposed to chloride attack”, J. Materials in Civil Engineering, 2015, V. 27, Issue 11, 8 p.; doi: 10.1061/(ASCE) MT.1943-5533.0001293