Stretch Length Anchor Bolts under Combined Tension and Shear

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Stretch Length Anchor Bolts under Combined Tension and Shear

Author(s): Joel E. Parks, Chris P. Pantelides, Luis Ibarra, and David H. Sanders

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 115

Issue: 5

Appears on pages(s): 1317-1328

Keywords: anchor bolt; biaxial testing; concrete anchor; ductility; seismic; shear; stretch length; tension

DOI: 10.14359/51702236

Date: 9/1/2018

Abstract:
Yielding of anchor bolts is a source of ductility in the seismic response of structures found in industrial facilities including tanks, circular vessels, and nuclear storage containers. Satisfactory seismic performance of anchor bolts with a stretch length has prompted ACI 318-14 to recommend their use with a stretch length of eight bar diameters, based on empirical evidence. In this study, individual ductile anchor bolts with stretch lengths of four, six, and eight bar diameters are tested to examine their performance under cyclic loads under combined tension and shear loads. Two types of steel chairs for connecting the anchor bolts to circular vessels were used: an elastic steel chair designed according to American Petroleum Institute Standards, and a steel chair designed to yield. The experiments show that, under combined cyclic tension and shear loads, anchor bolts with a stretch length of at least four bar diameters create a ductile connection compared to a conventional anchor bolt, while maintaining a similar tension and shear load capacity. At high shear-to-tension load ratios, the maximum tensile displacement capacity is reduced. A yielding steel chair is found to increase the displacement capacity and decrease the stiffness of the connection compared to an elastic chair.

Related References:

1. Soules, J. G.; Bachman, R. E.; and Silva, J. F., “Chile Earthquake of 2010: Assessment of Industrial Facilities around Concepcion,” ASCE/SEI, Reston, VA, 2016, 105 pp.

2. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

3. FEMA, “Appropriate Seismic Load Combinations for Base Plate, Anchorages, and Foundations,” NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC, 2009, pp. 75-278.

4. Trautner, C. A.; Hutchinson, T. C.; and Grosser, P. R., “Cyclic Behavior of Structural Base Plate Connections with Ductile Fastening Failure: Component Test Results,” Proceedings of the 10th National Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Anchorage, AK, 2014, pp. 845-855.

5. Trautner, C.; Hutchinson, T.; Copellini, M.; Grosser, P.; Bachman, R.; and Silva, J., “Developing Ductility Using Concrete Anchorage,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2017, pp. 101-112. doi: 10.14359/51689152

6. API Standard 650, “Welded Tanks for Oil Storage,” American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 2013.

7. ASTM A370-12a, “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 48 pp.

8. Parks, J. E.; Pantelides, C. P.; Maree, A.; Nielsen, T.; Ibarra, L.; and Sanders, D., “Seismic Anchorage of Dry Storage Casks,” 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, Paper No. 2205, 2017, 12 pp.

9. ACI Committee 355, “Qualification of Post-Installed Mechanical Anchors in Concrete (ACI 355.2-07) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2007, 39 pp.

10. ACI Committee 355, “Qualification of Post-Installed Adhesive Anchors (ACI 355.4-11) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2011, 56 pp.

11. Silva, J., “Test Methods for Seismic Qualification of Post-Installed Anchors,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Connections between Steel and Concrete, Stuttgart, Germany, 2001, pp. 551-563.

12. FEMA 461, “Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components (FEMA-461),” Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2007, 138 pp.

13. Hutchinson, T. C., and Wood, R., “Cyclic Load Protocol for Anchored Nonstructural Components and Systems,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 29, No. 3, 2013, pp. 817-842. doi: 10.1193/1.4000169

14. Mahrenholtz, P.; Eligehausen, R.; Hutchinson, T. C.; and Hoehler, M. S., “Behavior of Post-Installed Anchors Tested by Stepwise Increasing Cyclic Load Protocols,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2016, pp. 997-1008. doi: 10.14359/51689023


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer