Void Detection and Thickness Measurement in Concrete Elements

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Void Detection and Thickness Measurement in Concrete Elements

Author(s): Leonel Lipa, Enrique N. Pasquel, Laura M. Navarro, and José Del Álamo

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 115

Issue: 4

Appears on pages(s): 549-556

Keywords: pulse-echo; thickness; ultrasonic; voids

DOI: 10.14359/51702188

Date: 7/1/2018

Abstract:
In this research, a methodology is proposed to detect voids and measure thicknesses in typical concrete specimens in buildings. To develop this methodology, beams and concrete walls with voids represented by expanded polystyrene elements and hollow plastic or cardboard elements were made. Ultrasonic and ultrasonic pulse-echo equipment were used to scan and locate these elements, as well as measure the thickness of the specimens made of concrete. The dimensions of the simulated voids are very close to the length of the ultrasound waves, so post-processing of the data obtained was performed to improve the results of this research.

Related References:

1. Carino, N. J., and Sansalone, M., “Pulse-Echo Method for Flaw Detection in Concrete,” Final Report, Center for Building Technology, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, 1984.

2. Hoła, J., and Schabowicz, K., “State-of-the-Art Nondestructive Methods for Diagnostic Testing of Building Structures – Anticipated Development Trends,” Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, V. 10, V. 3, 2010, pp. 5-18.

3. ACI Committee 228, “Nondestructive Test Methods for Evaluation of Concrete in Structures (ACI 228.2R-13),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2013, 82 pp.

4. Malhotra, V. M., and Carino, N. J., Handbook on Nondestructive Testing of Concrete, second edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2004, 384 pp.

5. Martin, T., “Ultrasonic Testing on EUROFER Welded Joints for Determination of the Minimum Detectable Flaw Size,” KIT Scientific Reports 7543, 2010, pp. 1-2.

6. Haach, V. G., and Ramirez, F. C., “Qualitative Assessment of Concrete by Ultrasound Tomography,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 119, 2016, pp. 61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.056

7. Carino, N. J., “Laboratory Study of Flaw Detection in Concrete by the Pulse-Echo Method,” In-Situ/Nondestructive Testing of Concrete, SP-82, V. M. Malhotra, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1984, pp. 557-580.

8. Doctor, S. R.; Hall, T. E.; and Reid, L. D., “SAFT — The Evolution of a Signal Processing Technology for Ultrasonic Testing,” NDT&E International, V. 19, No. 3, 1986, pp. 163-167. doi: 10.1016/0308-9126(86)90105-7

9. Shandiz, H. T., and Gaydecki, P. A., “An Enhanced, High-Speed Ultrasonic SAFT System for Imaging of Defects within Concrete Structures,” AIP Conference Proceedings, V. 557, No.1, 2001, pp. 703-709.

10. Hosseini, Z.; Momayez, M.; Hassani, F.; and Lévesque, D., “Detection of Inclined Cracks inside Concrete Structures by Ultrasonic SAFT,” AIP Conference Proceedings, V. 975, No. 1, 2008, pp. 1298-1304.

11. Tong, J. H.; Chiu, C. L.; and Wang, C. Y., “Improved Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique by Hilbert-Huang Transform for Imaging Defects inside a Concrete Structure,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, V. 57, No. 11, 2010, pp. 2512-2521.

12. Cassidy, N. J.; Eddies, R.; and Dods, S., “Void Detection beneath Reinforced Concrete Sections: The Practical Application of Ground-Penetrating Radar and Ultrasonic Techniques,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, V. 74, No. 4, 2011, pp. 263-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.06.003

13. De La Haza, A. O.; Samokrutov, A. A.; and Samokrutov, P. A., “Assessment of Concrete Structures Using the Mira and Eyecon Ultrasonic Shear Wave Devices and the SAFT-C Image Reconstruction Technique,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 38, 2013, pp. 1276-1291. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.002

14. Beutel, R.; Reinhardt, H. W.; Grosse, C. U.; Glaubitt, A.; Krause, M.; Maierhofer, C.; Algernon, D.; Wiggenhauser, H.; and Schickert, M., “Comparative Performance Tests and Validation of NDT Methods for Concrete Testing,” Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, V. 27, No. 1-3, 2008, pp. 59-65. doi: 10.1007/s10921-008-0037-1

15. ASTM C192/C192M-16a, “Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 8 pp.

16. ASTM C511-13, “Standard Specification for Mixing Rooms, Moist Cabinets, Moist Rooms, and Water Storage Tanks Used in the Testing of Hydraulic Cements and Concretes,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 3 pp.

17. ASTM C150/C150M-16e1, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 10 pp.

18. ASTM C597-16, “Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity through Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 4 pp.

19. ASTM C39/C39M-17b, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 8 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer