Title:
Revisiting Effects of Cylinder Cap Type and Eccentricity— Part I: Variability of Strength
Author(s):
Michael J. Bolduc, Dan Mullins, and Ken Hover
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
115
Issue:
1
Appears on pages(s):
5-12
Keywords:
acceptance criteria; bonded caps; compression strength; cylinder testing; neoprene caps; quality control; sulfur caps; test methods; unbonded caps; variability
DOI:
10.14359/51701291
Date:
1/1/2018
Abstract:
The acceptability of unbonded neoprene caps has been established for over 20 years, and both bonded (ASTM C617) and unbonded (ASTM C1231) caps are currently used in commercial testing and in research. In this study, compressive strength results from one hundred 6 x 12 in. (152 x 304 mm) cylinders cast from a single batch of ready mixed concrete, tested with both types of caps, indicated that while either cap type produced approximately equivalent strength, there was a significant difference in the standard deviations of the two populations. Further, strength obtained with unbonded caps was less sensitive to variations in cylinder eccentricity during testing. Response to eccentricity was most pronounced at 1/4 in. (6 mm), with neoprene-capped specimens showing increased strength and sulfur-capped specimens showing decreased strength. Predominant failure modes differed with both cap type and eccentricity. Observed differences in variability would impact the probability of meeting building code requirements for acceptance based on compressive strength.
Related References:
1. Carino, N. J.; Guthrie, W. F.; Lagergren, E. S.; and Mullings, G. M., “Effects of Testing Variables on the Strength of High-Strength (90 MPa) Concrete Cylinders,” High Strength Concrete, SP-149, V. M. Malhotra, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, Oct. 1994, pp. 589-632.
2. Carino, N. J.; Guthrie, W. F.; and Lagergren, E. S., “Effects of Testing Variables on the Measured Compressive Strength of High-Strength (90 MPa) Concrete,” NISTIR Publication No. 5405, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, Oct. 1994, 141 pp.
3. Ozyildirim, C., and Carino, N. J., “Concrete Strength Testing,” Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete-Making Materials, ASTM 169D, J. F. Lamond and J. H. Pielert, eds., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006, pp. 125-140.
4. Wedding, P. A., and Ozyildirim, C., “Neoprene Pads for Capping Concrete Cylinders,” Cement, Concrete, and Aggregates, V. 7, No. 1, 1985, pp. 25-28. doi: 10.1520/CCA10040J
5. Crouch, L. K., and Pearson, J. B., “Neoprene Capping for Static Modulus of Elasticity Testing,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 92, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1995, pp. 643-648.
6. Burg, R. G., “Compression Testing of High Strength Concrete,” PCA R&D Serial No. 2456, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 1999, p. 3.
7. Carrasquillo, P. M., and Carrasquillo, R. L., “Effect of Using Unbonded Capping Systems on the Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinders,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 85, No. 3, May-June 1987, pp. 141-147.
8. Pistelli, M. F., and Willems, T., “Evaluation of Cylinder Size and Capping Method in Compression Testing of Concrete,” Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, V. 15, No. 1, 1993, pp. 59-69.
9. Hover, K. C., “Observed Variability in Cylinder and Core Strength from the FHWA Highway Materials Engineering Course,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, V. 2441, 2014, pp. 72-80
10. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.
11. ACI Committee 301, “Specifications for Structural Concrete (ACI 301-16),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2016, 64 pp.
12. Burg, R. G.; Caldarone, M. A.; Detwiler, G.; Jansen, D. C.; and Willems, T. J., “Compression Testing of HSC: Latest Technology,” Concrete International, V. 21, No. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. 67-76.
13. ASTM C39/C39M-14a, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 7 pp.
14. Richardson, D. N., “Effects of Testing Variables on the Comparison of Neoprene Pad and Sulfur Mortar-Capped Concrete Test Cylinders,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 87, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 1990, pp. 489-495.
15. ASTM C143/C143M-12, “Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 4 pp.
16. ASTM C31/C31M-12, “Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 6 pp.
17. ASTM C617/C617M-12, “Standard Practice for Capping Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 6 pp.
18. ASTM C1231/C1231M-10a, “Standard Practice for Use of Unbonded Caps in Determination of Compressive Strength of Hardened Concrete Cylinders,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010, 5 pp.
19. Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G., Statistical Methods, eighth edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 1991, 503 pp.
20. ACI Committee 214, “Evaluation of Strength Test Results of Concrete (ACI 214R-02),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2002, 20 pp.