Comparison of Minimum Vertical Reinforcement Requirements for Reinforced Concrete Walls

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Comparison of Minimum Vertical Reinforcement Requirements for Reinforced Concrete Walls

Author(s): Yiqiu Lu and Richard S. Henry

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 115

Issue: 3

Appears on pages(s): 673-687

Keywords: design standards; drift capacity; finite element model; minimum vertical reinforcement; reinforced concrete; reinforcement fracture; seismic design; wall

DOI: 10.14359/51701146

Date: 5/1/2018

Abstract:
Recent research and post-earthquake observations have raised doubts over the crack distribution and deformation capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) walls with vertical reinforcement contents close to minimum requirements. To investigate the seismic behavior of lightly reinforced concrete walls, the minimum vertical reinforcement requirements for ductile RC walls from concrete design standards worldwide were examined. A series of numerical analyses were conducted to compare the cracking behavior of flexural walls using a finite element model that was developed and validated using existing test data. The results from the analyses showed that RC walls designed in accordance with requirements for minimum distributed vertical reinforcement did not generate many cracks within the plastic hinge region. Lumping additional reinforcement at the ends of the wall, as required by some design standards, generally improved the distribution of cracking and ductility. However, concentrating too much reinforcement at the ends of the wall resulted in the web region being vulnerable to the development of large, widely spaced cracks that may contribute to poor seismic performance. Therefore, it is recommended that the ratio between reinforcement concentrated at the end of the walls and distributed reinforcement through the web region be controlled. Furthermore, concrete and reinforcing steel strengths were shown to significantly influence the crack pattern and deformation capacity of the RC walls with minimum vertical reinforcement and should be accounted for when developing design standard requirements.

Related References:

1. Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. J. N., Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1992.

2. Henry, R. S., “Assessment of Minimum Vertical Reinforcement Limits for RC Walls,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, V. 46, No. 2, 2013, pp. 88-96.

3. Lu, Y.; Henry, R. S.; Gultom, R.; and Ma, Q. T., “Cyclic Testing of Reinforced Concrete Walls with Distributed Minimum Vertical Reinforcement,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 143, No. 5, 2017. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001723

4. Wood, S. L.; Stark, R.; and Greer, S. A., “Collapse of Eight-Story RC Building during 1985 Chile Earthquake,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 117, No. 2, 1991, pp. 600-619. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:2(600)

5. Wood, S. L., “Minimum Tensile Reinforcement Requirements in Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 86, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 1989, pp. 582-591.

6. Sritharan, S.; Beyer, K.; Henry, R. S.; Chai, Y. H.; Kowalsky, M.; and Bull, D., “Understanding Poor Seismic Performance of Concrete Walls and Design Implications,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 30, No. 1, 2014, pp. 307-334. doi: 10.1193/021713EQS036M

7. Lu, Y., and Henry, R. S., “Numerical Modelling of Reinforced Concrete Walls with Minimum Vertical Reinforcement,” Engineering Structures, V. 143, No. 7, 2017, pp. 330-345. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.043

8. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 520 pp.

9. NZS 3101:2006, “Concrete Structures Standard (Amendment 2),” Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 2006, 696 pp.

10. NZS 3101:2006, “Concrete Structures Standard (Amendment 3),” Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 2017, 754 pp.

11. CEN, “Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004, 232 pp.

12. CSA, “Design of Concrete Structures (CSA-A23.3-14),” Canadian Standards Association, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2014, 297 pp.

13. GB 50010-2010, “Code for Design of Concrete Structures,” China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China, 2010, 439 pp.

14. Cook, D.; Fenwick, R.; and Russell, A., “Amendment 3 to NZS3101,” The New Zealand Concrete Industry Conference, Taupo, New Zealand, 2014, 15 pp.

15. Russell, A.; Henry, R. S.; and Fenwick, R. C., “Design of RC Walls Post the Canterbury Earthquakes,” Proceedings of the Concrete Industries Conference, Rotorua, New Zealand, 2015, 11 pp.

16. Lu, Y., “Seismic Design of Lightly Reinforced Concrete Walls,” PhD thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2017, 321 pp.

17. Wong, S. M.; Vecchio, F. J.; and Trommels, H., VecTor2 and Formworks User’s Manual, second edition, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2002, 318 pp.

18. Park, R.; Priestley, M. J. N.; and Gill, W. D., “Ductility of Square-Confined Concrete Columns,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 108, 1982, pp. 929-950.

19. Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P., “Compression Response of Cracked Reinforced Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 119, No. 12, 1993, pp. 3590-3610. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3590)

20. Lee, S.-C.; Cho, J.-Y.; and Vecchio, F. J., “Model for Post-Yield Tension Stiffening and Rebar Rupture in Concrete Members,” Engineering Structures, V. 33, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1723-1733. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.009

21. fib, “Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010,” Ernst & Sohn, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2013, 311 pp.

22. Palermo, D., and Vecchio, F. J., “Behaviour and Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Walls Subjected to Reversed Cyclic Loading,” Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2002, 492 pp.

23. Seckin, M., “Hysteretic Behaviour of Cast-in-Place Exterior Beam Column Subassemblies,” NK50348, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1981, 266 pp.

24. Coleman, J., and Spacone, E., “Localization Issues in Force-Based Frame Elements,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 127, No. 11, 2001, pp. 1257-1265. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:11(1257)

25. Pugh, J. S.; Lowes, L. N.; and Lehman, D. E., “Seismic Design of Concrete Walled Buildings,” Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul, Turkey, 2014, 12 pp.

26. Dazio, A.; Beyer, K.; and Bachmann, H., “Quasi-Static Cyclic Tests and Plastic Hinge Analysis of RC Structural Walls,” Engineering Structures, V. 31, No. 7, 2009, pp. 1556-1571. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.018

27. Aaleti, S.; Brueggen, B. L.; Johnson, B.; French, C. E.; and Sritharan, S., “Cyclic Response of Reinforced Concrete Walls with Different Anchorage Details: Experimental Investigation,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 139, No. 7, 2013, pp. 1181-1191. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000732

28. Riva, P.; Meda, A.; and Giuriani, E., “Cyclic Behaviour of a Full Scale RC Structural Wall,” Engineering Structures, V. 25, No. 6, 2003, pp. 835-845. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00020-8


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer