Effect of Synthetic Fibers on Shear Capacity of Reinforced Rubberized Concrete Beams

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Effect of Synthetic Fibers on Shear Capacity of Reinforced Rubberized Concrete Beams

Author(s): Basem H. AbdelAleem, Mohamed K. Ismail, and Assem A. A. Hassan

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 115

Issue: 2

Appears on pages(s): 279-288

Keywords: crumb rubber; large-scale reinforced concrete beams; selfconsolidating and vibrated concretes; shear behavior; synthetic fibers

DOI: 10.14359/51701123

Date: 3/1/2018

Abstract:
This paper investigates the combined effect of crumb rubber (CR) and microsynthetic/macrosynthetic fibers on the shear behavior of reinforced concrete beams. Twelve large-scale self-consolidating and vibrated concrete beams were constructed with varied percentages of CR (0 to 30%) and different types and volumes (0, 0.2, and 1%) of synthetic fibers. The tested fibers included microsynthetic fibers (MISFs) 19 mm (0.75 in.) in length (MISF19) and macro-synthetic fibers (MASFs) of various lengths: 38 mm (1.5 in.) (MASF38); 50 mm (1.97 in.) (MASF50); and 54 mm (2.13 in.) (MASF54). The experimental results indicated that the inclusion of CR negatively affected the ultimate shear load, post-diagonal cracking resistance, energy absorption, and first cracking moment of the tested beams while it improved the deformation capacity, self-weight, and cracking pattern. Combining CR with MISFs or MASFs (especially MASF38 and MASF50) further improved the deformation capacity, selfweight, and narrowed the crack widths of tested beams. The results also indicated that the use of a relatively higher percentage of fibers (1% compared to 0.2%) in vibrated rubberized concrete beams significantly compensated for the reduction in shear strength resulting from a high CR replacement of 30%. Noticeable increases in the deformation capacity, post-diagonal cracking resistance, and energy absorption capacity were also achieved in vibrated rubberized beams, especially when MASF38 and MASF54 were used.

Related References:

1. Zheng, L.; Huo, X. S.; and Yuan, Y., “Experimental Investigation on Dynamic Properties of Rubberized Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 22, No. 5, 2008, pp. 939-947. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.005

2. Najim, K. B., and Hall, M., “Mechanical and Dynamic Properties of Self-Compacting Crumb Rubber Modified Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 27, No. 1, 2012, pp. 521-530. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.013

3. Holmes, N.; Browne, A.; and Montague, C., “Acoustic Properties of Concrete Panels with Crumb Rubber as a Fine Aggregate Replacement,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 73, 2014, pp. 195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.107

4. Ismail, M. K., and Hassan, A. A. A., “Impact Resistance and Acoustic Absorption Capacity of Self-Consolidating Rubberized Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 113, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2016, pp. 725-736. doi: 10.14359/51689359

5. Gesoğlu, M.; Güneyisi, E.; Khoshnaw, G.; and Ipek, S., “Abrasion and Freezing–Thawing Resistance of Pervious Concretes Containing Waste Rubbers,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 73, 2014, pp. 19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.047

6. Thomas, B. S.; Kumar, S.; Mehra, P.; Gupta, R. C.; Joseph, M.; and Csetenyi, L. J., “Abrasion Resistance of Sustainable Green Concrete Containing Waste Tire Rubber Particles,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 124, 2016, pp. 906-909. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.110

7. Thomas, B. S.; Gupta, R. C.; and Panicker, V. H., “Recycling of Waste Tire Rubber as Aggregate in Concrete: Durability-Related Performance,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 112, 2016, pp. 504-513. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.046

8. Ismail, M. K., and Hassan, A. A. A., “Use of Metakaolin on Enhancing the Mechanical Properties of Self-Consolidating Concrete Containing High Percentages of Crumb Rubber,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 125, 2016, pp. 282-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.044

9. Najim, K. B., and Hall, M., “A Review of the Fresh/Hardened Properties and Applications for Plain- (PRC) and Self-Compacting Rubberised Concrete (SCRC),” Construction and Building Materials, V. 24, No. 11, 2010, pp. 2043-2051. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.056

10. Ismail, M. K., and Hassan, A. A. A., “Performance of Full-Scale Self-Consolidating Rubberized Concrete Beams in Flexure,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 113, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2015, pp. 207-218.

11. Sadek, D. M., and El-Attar, M. M., “Structural Behaviour of Rubberized Masonry Walls,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 89, 2015, pp. 174-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.098

12. Ganesan, N.; Bharati, R. J.; and Shashikala, A. P., “Behavior of Self-Consolidating Rubberized Concrete Beam-Column Joints,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 110, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2013, pp. 697-704.

13. Youssf, O.; ElGawady, M. A.; and Mills, J. E., “Experimental Investigation of Crumb Rubber Concrete Columns under Seismic Loading,” Structures, V. 3, 2015, pp. 13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2015.02.005

14. Yap, S. P.; Bu, C. H.; Alengaram, U. J.; Mo, K. H.; and Jumaat, M. Z., “Flexural Toughness Characteristics of Steel–Polypropylene Hybrid Fibre-Reinforced Oil Palm Shell Concrete,” Materials & Design, V. 57, 2014, pp. 652-659. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.004

15. Bolat, H.; Simsek, O.; Cullu, M.; Durmuş, G.; and Can, Ö., “The Effects of Macro Synthetic Fiber Reinforcement Use on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Concrete,” Composites. Part B, Engineering, V. 61, No. 1, 2014, pp. 191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.043

16. Kevern, J. T.; Biddle, D.; and Cao, Q., “Effects of Macro Synthetic Fibers on Pervious Concrete Properties,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 27, No. 9, 2015, p. 06014031 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001213

17. Corinaldesi, V., and Moriconi, G., “Use of Synthetic Fibers in Self-Compacting Lightweight Aggregate Concretes,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 4, 2015, pp. 247-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2015.10.006

18. Li, J.; Niu, J.; Wan, C.; Jin, B.; and Yin, Y., “Investigation on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of High Performance Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Lightweight Aggregate Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 118, 2016, pp. 27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.116

19. Ababneh, A.; Al-Rousan, R.; Alhassan, M.; and Alqadami, M., “Influence of Synthetic Fibers on the Shear Behavior of Lightweight Concrete Beams,” Advances in Structural Engineering, V. 20, No. 11, 2017, pp. 1671-1683. doi: 10.1177/1369433217691773

20. Altoubat, S.; Yazdanbakhsh, A.; and Rieder, K. A., “Shear Behavior of Macro-Synthetic Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrups,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 106, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2009, pp. 381-389.

21. Ismail, M. K., and Hassan, A. A. A., “Influence of Mixture Composition and Type of Cementitious Materials on Enhancing the Fresh Properties and Stability of Self-Consolidating Rubberized Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 28, No. 1, 2016, 04015075 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001338

22. Ismail, M. K., and Hassan, A. A. A., “Use of Steel Fibers to Optimize Self-Consolidating Concrete Mixtures Containing Crumb Rubber,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 114, No. 4, July-Aug. 2017, pp. 581-594.

23. ASTM C150/C150M-12, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 9 pp.

24. ASTM C618-12, “Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 3 pp.

25. ASTM C494/C494M-13, “Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 10 pp.

26. AbdelAleem, B. H.; Ismail, M. K.; and Hassan, A. A. A., “Properties of Self-Consolidating Rubberised Concrete Reinforced with Synthetic Fibres,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 69, No. 10, 2017, pp. 526-540. doi: 10.1680/jmacr.16.00433

27. EFNARC, “The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete Specification, Production and Use,” European Federation for Specialist Construction Chemicals and Concrete Systems, Norfolk, UK, 2005, 68 pp.

28. ASTM C143/C143M-15, “Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 4 pp.

29. ASTM C39/C39M-11, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, 7 pp.

30. ASTM C496/C496M-11, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, 5 pp.

31. Kani, G. N. J.; Huggins, M. W.; and Wittkopp, R. R., Shear in Reinforced Concrete, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1979, 225 pp.

32. Taylor, H. P. J., “The Fundamental Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams in Bending and Shear,” Shear Transfer by Aggregate Interlock, SP-42, T. Paulay and P. J. Loeber, eds., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1974, pp. 43-77.

33. Hassan, A. A. A.; Hossain, K. M. A.; and Lachemi, M., “Behavior of Full-Scale Self-Consolidating Concrete Beams in Shear,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 30, No. 7, 2008, pp. 588-596. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.03.005

34. Singh, S.; Shukla, A.; and Brown, R., “Pullout Behavior of Polypropylene Fibers from Cementitious Matrix,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 10, 2004, pp. 1919-1925. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.014

35. Banthia, N., “A Study of Some Factors Affecting the Fiber-Matrix Bond in Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 17, No. 4, 1990, pp. 610-620. doi: 10.1139/l90-069

36. CSA A23.3-04, “Design of Concrete Structures,” CSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2004, 258 pp.

37. Abouhussien, A. A.; Hassan, A. A. A.; and Ismail, M. K., “Properties of Semi-Lightweight Self-Consolidating Concrete Containing Lightweight Slag Aggregate,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 75, 2015, pp. 63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.028

38. Hassan, A. A. A.; Ismail, M. K.; and Mayo, J., “Shear Behavior of SCC Beams with Different Coarse-to-Fine Aggregate Ratios and Coarse Aggregate Types,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 27, No. 11, 2015, p. 04015022 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001276


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer