Title:
Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Concretes: From Dry to Fluid Concretes
Author(s):
Raphaëlle Pouhet and Martin Cyr
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
320
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
32.1-32.20
Keywords:
Geopolymer concrete, Metakaolin, Workability, Porosity, Reinforced beams, Masonry units, Industrial precast plant
DOI:
10.14359/51701070
Date:
8/1/2017
Abstract:
This study evaluates if a metakaolin-based geopolymer can be an effective binder to replace Portland cement in concrete. The geopolymer formulation is quite different from that of
Portland cement paste. It involves molar ratios and not the traditional water/cement mass ratio. This study shows that in spite of these differences, it is possible to make geopolymer
concrete with variable properties by adjusting water and aggregate content. It was concluded that several applications can be targeted, from fluid to dry concretes. Compressive strength of geopolymer concretes showed that these materials could have similar mechanical properties to Portland cement concretes, despite a higher porosity. The amount of aggregates seemed to have a negligible effect on the performance of geopolymer concrete, probably due to the absence of ITZ at the binder-aggregate interface. Finally, the viability of this new binder was tested by making reinforced beams and masonry units directly in an industrial precast plant.
Related References:
1. Shi, C., Krivenko, P. v. and Roy, D. M. (2006) Alkali-Activated Cements and Concretes, Abingdon, UK,Taylor and Francis.
2. Provis, J. L., and Van Deventer, J. S. J. (2009a), Geopolymers: Structures, Processing, Properties andIndustrial Applications, Woodhead Publishing Limited.
3. Bligh, R., & Glasby, T. (2013). Development of geopolymer precast floor panels for the Global ChangeInstitute at University of Queensland. In Proceedings Concrete Institute of Australia BiennialConference, Concrete.
4. Pacheco-Torgal, F., Jalali, S., & Castro Gomes, J. P. (2009). Utilization of mining wastes to producegeopolymer binders. Geopolymers: structure, processing, properties and industrial applications.Woodhead, 267-293.
5. Palomo, A., Krivenko, P., Garcia-Lodeiro, I., Kavalerova, E., Maltseva, O., & Fernández-Jiménez, A. (2014).A review on alkaline activation: new analytical perspectives. Materiales de Construcción, 64(315), e022.
6. Duxson, P., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Palomo, A., Deventer, J. S. J., (2007a)Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science, 42(9): 2917-2933.
7. Pouhet, R. and Cyr, M. (2016). Formulation and performance of flash metakaolin geopolymer concretes.Construction and Building Materials, 120, 150-160.
8. Kamalloo, A., Ganjkhanlou, Y., Aboutalebi, S. H., and Nouranian H. (2010) Modeling of compressivestrength of metakaolin based geopolymers by the use of artificial neural network. International Journalof Engineering, 23(2):145-152.
9. Rowles, M., et O’Connor, B. (2003) Chemical optimisation of the compressive strength of aluminosilicategeopolymers synthesised by sodium silicate activation of metakaolinite. Journal of MaterialsChemistry 13(5): 1161-1165. doi: 10.1039/b212629j
10. Duxson P., Mallicoat, S. W., Lukey, J. L., Kriven, W., Van Deventer, J.S.J. (2007), The effect of alkali andSi/Al ratio on the development of mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers. Colloids andSurfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 292(1): 8-20.
11. Duxson P., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Mallicoat, S. W., Waltraud, M., Kriven, W., Van Deventer, J.S.J.(2005) Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanicalproperties, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 269(1–3): 47-58 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060
12. Barbosa, V.F.F., MacKenzie, K.J.D. and Thaumaturgo, C. (2000) Synthesis and characterisation ofmaterials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: sodium polysialate polymers.International Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2(4): 309-317.
13. Steins, P., Poulesquen, A., Frizon, F., Diat, O., Jestin, J., Causse, J., Lambertina, D., Rossignol, S. (2013)Effect of aging and alkali activator on the porous structure of a geopolymer, Journal of AppliedCrystallography, 47:316-324.
14. Lizcano, M., Gonzalez, A., Basu, S., Lozano, K., & Radovic, M. (2012). Effects of Water Content andChemical Composition on Structural Properties of Alkaline Activated Metakaolin-BasedGeopolymers. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 95(7), 2169-2177.
15. Perera, D. S., Vance, E. R., Finnie, K. S., Blackford, M. G., Hanna, J. V., & Cassidy, D. J. (2005).Disposition of water in metakaolinite based geopolymers. Advances in Ceramic Matrix Composites XI,Volume 175, 225-236.
16. Okada, K., Ooyama, A., Isobe, T., Kameshima, Y., Nakajima, A., & MacKenzie, K. J. (2009). Waterretention properties of porous geopolymers for use in cooling applications. Journal of the EuropeanCeramic Society, 29(10), 1917-1923.
17. Álvarez-Ayuso, E., Querol, X., Plana, F., Alastuey, A., Moreno, N., Izquierdo, M., ... & Barra, M. (2008).Environmental, physical and structural characterisation of geopolymer matrixes synthesised from coal(co-) combustion fly ashes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154(1), 175-183.
18. Provis, J. L., Yong, C. Z., Duxson, P., & van Deventer, J. S. (2009). Correlating mechanical and thermalproperties of sodium silicate-fly ash geopolymers.Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical andEngineering Aspects, 336(1), 57-63.
19. Zuhua, Z., Xiao, Y., Huajun, Z., & Yue, C. (2009). Role of water in the synthesis of calcined kaolin-basedgeopolymer. Applied Clay Science, 43(2), 218-223.
20. Zhang, Z., Yao, X., & Zhu, H. (2010). Potential application of geopolymers as protection coatings formarine concrete: II. Microstructure and anticorrosion mechanism. Applied clay science, 49(1), 7-12.
21. San Nicolas, R., Cyr, M., Escadeillas G. (2013) Characteristics and applications of flash metakaolins,Applied Clay Science, 83–84: 253-262. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2013.08.036