Title:
Methodology for Life-Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Building Structures
Author(s):
M. C. Caruso, C. Menna, D. Asprone, A. Prota, and G. Manfredi
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
114
Issue:
2
Appears on pages(s):
323-336
Keywords:
comparative sustainability assessment; life-cycle assessment (LCA); reinforced concrete structure; steel structure; sustainability; wood structure
DOI:
10.14359/51689426
Date:
3/1/2017
Abstract:
This study aims to define a methodological framework that could guide construction community stakeholders in conducting environmental sustainability comparisons among building systems at the design stage. The study proceeds on the basis that the design of new structures starts with specific requirements, including national technical standards. An application of the proposed framework for the comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA) concerning a residential building is presented; three different structural materials are compared—namely, reinforced concrete (RC), steel, and wood. Starting with functional, architectural, and structural requirements, the building is designed and verified to take into account how structural solutions change depending on each building material. A cradle-to-grave LCA study is conducted for the three alternative structures using SimaPro software; both IMPACT2002+ and EPD2008 methodologies are used to quantify environmental impacts.
Related References:
1. ITACA Italia Protocol, Roma, Italy, http://www.itaca.org/valutazione_sostenibilita.asp.
2. U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, DC, http://www.usgbc.org/leed.
3. International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment, SBTool, http://iisbe.org/sbtool-2012.
4. HQE, http://www.behqe.com/
5. DGNB, German Sustainable Building Council, http://www.dgnb.de/en.
6. BREEAM, http://www.breeam.org.
7. GBC, World Green Building Council, London, England, http://www.worldgbc.org.
8. CASBEE, Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency, Japan, http://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english.
9. ISO 14040, “Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework,” International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
10. Gerilla, G. P.; Teknomo, K.; and Hokao, K., “An Environmental Assessment of Wood and Steel Reinforced Concrete Housing Construction,” Building and Environment, V. 42, No. 7, 2007, pp. 2778-2784. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.07.021
11. Peuportier, B. L. P., “Life Cycle Assessment Applied to the Comparative Evaluation of Single Family Houses in the French Context,” Energy and Building, V. 33, No. 5, 2001, pp. 443-450. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00101-8
12. Xing, S.; Xu, Z.; and Jun, G., “Inventory Analysis of LCA on Steel and Concrete-Construction Office Buildings,” Energy and Building, V. 40, No. 7, 2008, pp. 1188-1193. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.10.016
13. Asdrubali, F.; Baldassarri, C.; and Fthenaki, V., “Life Cycle Analysis in the Construction Sector: Guiding the Optimization of Conventional Italian Buildings,” Energy and Building, V. 64, 2013, pp. 73-89. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.018
14. Pajchrowski, G.; Noskowiak, A.; Lewandowska, A.; and Strykowski, W., “Wood as a Building Material in the Light of Environmental Assessment of Full Life Cycle of Four Buildings,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 52, 2014, pp. 428-436. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.066
15. Guggemos, A. A., and Horvath, A., “Comparison of Environmental Effects of Steel and Concrete-Framed Buildings,” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, V. 11, No. 2, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:2(93)
16. ISO 14044, “Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment, Requirements, and Guidelines,” International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
17. EN 15978, “Sustainability of Construction Works – Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings—Calculation Method,” 2011.
18. NTC, Ministry of Infrastructure, D.M. 14.01.2008, Technical Codes for Structures. Ordinary Supplement to G.U. 04.02.2008 (in Italian).
19. Superior Board of Public Works, Ministerial Circular n.617, 02.02.2009. Instruction for Application of “Technical Codes for Structures” according to Ministerial Decree of 14.01.2008. G.U. 26.02.2009 n.47, ordinary supplement n.27 (in Italian).
20. EN 1993-1-1, “Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
21. CNR-DT 206/2007, “Instruction for Design, Construction and Control of Wooden Structures,” (in Italian).
22. Acca Software Tutorial and Edilus User Manual, 2013. (in Italian)
23. EN 1998-1, CEN, “Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings,” Comité Européen de Normalisation, 2004, Brussels, Belgium.
24. Product Ecology Consultants SimaPro 7 Introduction to LCA, 2010.
25. Huntzingera, D. N., and Eatmonb, T. D., “A Life-Cycle Assessment of Portland Cement Manufacturing: Comparing the Traditional Process with Alternative Technologies,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 17, No. 7, 2009, pp. 668-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007
26. Pacca, S.; Sivaraman, D.; and Keoleian, G. A., “Parameters Affecting the Life Cycle Performance of PV Technologies and Systems,” Energy Policy, V. 35, No. 6, 2007, pp. 3316-3326. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.003
27. Ecoinvent Centre, “The Life Cycle Inventory Data Version 2.2,” 2007.
28. Humbert S.; De Schryver A.; Bengoa X.; Margni M.; and Jolliet O., IMPACT2002+ User Guide for vQ2 21 1, Nov. 2012.
29. The International EPD Cooperation (IEC) Introduction, Intended uses and Key Program Elements for Environmental Product Declaration EPD. Version 1.0, 2008.
30. Vitale, P.; Torchia, A.; Menna, C.; De Gregorio, F.; Asprone, D.; Prota, A.; and Arena, U., “Life Cycle Analysis of Construction Phase of a Residential Building,” VIII Conference Rete Italiana LCA, Florence, Italy, June 19-20, 2014. (in Italian)
31. ISO 14713-1, “Zinc Coatings – Guidelines and Recommendations for the Protection Against Corrosion of Iron and Steel in Structures – Part 1: General Principles of Design and Corrosion Resistance,” International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 2009, 17 pp.
32. “Environmental Product Declaration of Zinc and Powder Coating Systems in Italy by NordZinc S.p.A. company,” Review II, Apr. 2010. (in Italian)
33. ISO 12944-6:1998, “Paints and Varnishes – Corrosion Protection of Steel Structures by Protective Pain Systems – Part 6: Laboratory Performance Test Methods,” International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
34. Italy of Recycling 2012 – Annual Report about Waste Recycling and Recovery – Chapter 13: Inert Waste from Construction and Demolition. ANPAR 2012 Report (in Italian).
35. Constructalia - Steel - the Most Recycled Material in the World – ArcelorMittal, http://www.constructalia.com/
36. ISO/TR 14049, “Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Examples of Application of ISO 14041 to Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis,” International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 2000, 52 pp.
37. WIS 2/3-59, “Recovering and Minimising Wood Waste,” TRADA Technology Ltd, London, UK, revised June 2008, 6 pp.
38. ISO 14025, “Environmental Labels and Declarations – Type III Environmental Declarations – Principles and Procedures,” International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 2006, 25 pp.
39. The International EPD Cooperation (IEC) – Supporting Annexes, for Environmental Product Declarations, EPD. Version 1.0 dated 2008-02-29.