Chemical versus Physical Acceleration of Cement Hydration

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Chemical versus Physical Acceleration of Cement Hydration

Author(s): Dale P. Bentz, Franco Zunino, and Didier Lootens

Publication: Concrete International

Volume: 38

Issue: 11

Appears on pages(s): 37-44

Keywords: mixture, temperature, setting, strength

DOI: 10.14359/51689390

Date: 11/1/2016

Abstract:
Cold weather concreting often requires the use of chemical accelerators to speed up the cement hydration, setting, and early-age strength development. While calcium chloride is the most commonly used chemical accelerator, recent research using fine limestone powders has indicated their high proficiency for physically accelerating early-age hydration and reducing setting times. This article presents a comparative study of the efficiency of these two approaches.

Related References:

1. ACI Committee 306, “Guide to Cold Weather Concreting (ACI 306R-10),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2010, 26 pp.

2. American Society of Concrete Contractors, “Position Statement #31 – Acceptable Use of Calcium Chloride in Concrete,” Concrete International, V. 32, No. 2, Feb. 2010, p. 55.

3. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

4. Ramachandran, V.S., Calcium Chloride in Concrete: Science and Technology, Applied Science Publishers, London, UK, 1981, 216 pp.

5. Rapp, P., “Effect of Calcium Chloride on Portland Cements and Concrete,” Research Paper RP782, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, V. 14, Apr. 1935, pp. 499-517.

6. Rosenberg, A.M., “Study of the Mechanism Through Which Calcium Chloride Accelerates the Set of Portland Cement,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 61, No. 10, Oct. 1964, pp. 1261-1270.

7. Juenger, M.C.G.; Monteiro, P.J.M.; Gartner, E.M.; and Denbeaux, G.P., “A Soft X-ray Microscope Investigation into the Effects of Calcium Chloride on Tricalcium Silicate Hydration,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 35, No. 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 19-25.

8. Peterson, V.K., and Juenger, M.C.G., “Hydration of Tricalcium Silicate: Effects of CaCl2 and Sucrose on Reaction Kinetics and Product Formation,” Chemistry of Materials, V. 18, No. 24, Nov. 2006, pp. 5798-5804.

9. Nicoleau, L., “Accelerated Growth of Calcium Silicate Hydrates: Experiments and Simulations,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 41, No. 12, Dec. 2011, pp. 1139-1148.

10. Bentz, D.P., “Engineering Concrete Performance,” Concrete International, V. 29, No. 11, Nov. 2007, pp. 33-37.

11. Turpin, R.C., “Cementitious Composition with Limestone Accelerator,” U.S. Patent 6,451,105 B1, filed Nov. 17, 2000, and issued Sept. 17, 2002.

12. Gurney, L.; Bentz, D.P.; Sato, T.; and Weiss, W.J., “Reducing Set Retardation in High-Volume Fly Ash Mixtures with the Use of Limestone,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 2290, 2012, pp. 139-146.

13. Bentz, D.P., “Activation Energies of High-Volume Fly Ash Ternary Blends: Hydration and Setting,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 53, Oct. 2014, pp. 214-223.

14. Bentz, D.P.; Jones, S.Z.; and Lootens, D., “Minimizing Paste Content in Concrete Using Limestone Powders – Demonstration Mixtures,” NIST Technical Note 1906, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 2016, 38 pp.

15. ASTM C150-07, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2007, 8 pp.

16. ASTM C109/C109M-13, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 10 pp.

17. ASTM C778-13, “Standard Specification for Standard Sand,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 3 pp.

18. ASTM C185-08, “Standard Test Method for Air Content of Hydraulic Cement Mortar,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008, 4 pp.

19. ASTM C1437-13, “Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 2 pp.

20. ASTM C191-13, “Standard Test Methods for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 8 pp.

21. Bentz, D.P., and Ferraris, C.F., “Rheology and Setting of High-Volume Fly Ash Mixtures,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 32, No. 4, Apr. 2010, pp. 265-270.

22. Taylor, B.N., and Kuyatt, C.E., “Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results,” NIST Technical Note 1297, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 1994, 20 pp.

23. Taylor, H.F.W., Cement Chemistry, second edition, Thomas Telford, London, UK, 1997, 480 pp.

24. Thomas, J.J., “The Instantaneous Apparent Activation Energy of Cement Hydration Using a Novel Calorimetry-Based Method,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 95, No, 10. Aug. 2012, pp. 3291-3296.

25. ASTM C1074-11, “Standard Practice for Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, 10 pp.

26. Carino, N.J., and Lew, H.S., “Temperature Effects on Strength-Maturity Relations of Mortar,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 80, No. 3, May-June 1983, pp. 177-182.

27. Bentz, D.P.; Bognacki, C.J.; Riding, K.A.; and Villarreal, V.H., “Hotter Cements, Cooler Concretes,” Concrete International, V. 33, No. 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 41-48.




  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer