Title:
Continuous Transverse Reinforcement—Behavior and Design Implications
Author(s):
B. M. Shahrooz, M. L. Forry, N. S. Anderson, H. L. Bill, and A. M. Doellman
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
113
Issue:
5
Appears on pages(s):
1085-1094
Keywords:
code; concrete beam; concrete column; continuous transverse reinforcement (CTR); cyclic testing; design; reinforcement; shear; torsion
DOI:
10.14359/51689154
Date:
9/1/2016
Abstract:
Recent advancements in automatic reinforcing bar bending machines allow fabrication of continuous transverse reinforcement (CTR) with 90-degree transverse bends. The resulting closed, continuous reinforcement increases the speed by which transverse reinforcement can be placed, and can also improve structural performance. The ACI 318 Building Code (hereafter referred to as the “Code”) does not explicitly permit the use of CTR, although it is possible to receive approval based on sufficiently detailed supporting documentation. The research reported herein was conducted to evaluate performance of CTR in comparison to conventional transverse reinforcement (stirrup, tie, spiral, or hoop) for a wide range of loading scenarios. The data generated through this research provide background information necessary to modify the Code, such that CTR is recognized as an acceptable and economical alternative to conventional transverse reinforcement made in single pieces. Evaluation of the experimental data from full-scale members and subassemblies showed current design provisions and detailing practices are applicable to CTR, and CTR can be used in lieu of conventional transverse reinforcement. Members and connections reinforced with CTR have better post-peak behavior, and generally higher strength and stiffness than comparable elements with conventional transverse steel. Nevertheless, the direction of applied torque in comparison to the direction in which CTR “spirals” is an important consideration and impacts the member performance. Recommendations and design equations for CTR are provided in this paper.
Related References:
1. ACI, Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.
2. Azimi, M.; Adnan, A. B.; Sam, A. R. B. M.; Tahir, M. M.; Faridmehr, I.; and Hodjati, R., “Seismic Performance of RC Beam-Column Connections with Continuous Rectangular Spiral Transverse Reinforcements for Low Ductility Classes,” The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 12 pp.
3. Bartoli, G., “Tests on R.C. Beams with ‘Spirex’ and ‘Traditional’ Transverse Reinforcement,” Research Report, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, 2009, 7 pp.
4. Chalioris, C. E., and Karayannis C. G., “Experimental Investigation of RC Beams with Rectangular Spiral Reinforcement in Torsion,” Engineering Structures, V. 56, 2013, pp. 286-297.
5. Corte, W. D., and Boel, V., “Effectiveness of Spirally Shaped Stirrups in Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Engineering Structures, V. 52, 2013, pp. 667-675.
6. Karayannis, C. G., and Chalioris, C. E., “Shear Tests of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Continuous Rectangular Spiral Reinforcement,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 52, 2013, pp. 667-675.
7. Riva, P., “Cyclic Test on Column-Foundations Using ‘Spirex’ Stirrups,” Research Report, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy, 2009, 47 pp.
8. Shahrooz, B. M.; Bill, H. L.; Miller, M. L.; and Doellman, A. M., “Continuous Transverse Reinforcement—Behavior and Performance,” Research Report, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 2014, 178 pp.
9. Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 352, “Recommendations for Design of Beam-Column Connections in Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Structures (ACI 352R-02),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2002, 37 pp.
10. MacGregor, J. G., and Wight, J. K., Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, fifth edition, Pearson, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2009, 1157 pp.
11. Hsu, T. T. C., Unified Theory of Reinforced Concrete, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1993, 313 pp.
12. SEI/ASCE 7-10, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
13. ASTM C39/C39M-14, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 7 pp.
14. ASTM C496/C496M-11, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, 5 pp.
15. ASTM E8/E8M-09, “Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009, 27 pp.