Title:
Use of Locked-Cycle Protocol to Assess Cement Fineness and Properties in Laboratory Grinding Mills
Author(s):
Joseph J. Assaad and Camille A. Issa
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
113
Issue:
4
Appears on pages(s):
429-438
Keywords:
clinker; fineness; grinding; hydration
DOI:
10.14359/51688930
Date:
7/1/2016
Abstract:
Laboratory grinding mills operated for a given time interval do not consider the effect of circulating load (CL), thus generating excessively wide cement particle size distribution (PSD) curves that are not representative of what is normally obtained from real-scale mills. The main objective of this paper is to develop a locked-cycle protocol that takes CL into account and mimics the clinker grinding operations encountered in closed-circuit industrial ball mills. The protocol consisted of screening the laboratory mill content after each grinding run to remove undersize, which is then replenished with an equal mass of new clinker until CL becomes constant. For given Blaine fineness, test results have shown that cement ground in the laboratory for a fixed time interval possesses wide PSD curves characterized by spread factor n less than 0.96. Conversely, the locked-cycled protocol led to narrower PSD, with n varying from 1.025 to 1.175. Cement ground using the lockedcycle protocol was found to require increased water demand as compared to that ground for a fixed time interval. Also, this protocol was found to generate a reduced fraction of particles finer than 1 μm, which led to relatively delayed setting times and reduced 1-day compressive strength. The locked-cycle approach led to higher 28-day compressive strength, given the reduced fraction of particles larger than 50 μm.
Related References:
1. Bhatty, J.; Miller, F.; and Kosmatka, S., “Innovations in Portland Cement Manufacturing,” SP400, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2004, 155 pp. (CD-ROM)
2. Mejeoumov, G. G., “Improved Cement Quality and Grinding Efficiency by Means of Closed Mill Circuit Modeling,” PhD thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2007, 198 pp.
3. Alsop, P., Cement Plant Operations Handbook for Dry Process Plants, Tradeship Publications Ltd., Portsmouth, UK, 2001, 125 pp.
4. Fidan, B., “A Comparative Analysis of the Recent Cement Grinding Systems with Particle-Based Influences on Cement Properties,” PhD thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2011, 109 pp.
5. Zhang, Y., and Napier-Munn, T., “Effects of Particle Size Distribution, Surface Area and Chemical Composition on Portland Cement Strength,” Powder Technology, V. 83, No. 3, 1995, pp. 245-252. doi: 10.1016/0032-5910(94)02964-P
6. Bentz, D.; Garboczi, E.; Haecker, C.; and Jensen, O., “Effects of Cement Particle Size Distribution on Performance Properties of Portland Cement-Based Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 29, No. 10, 1999, pp. 1663-1671. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00163-5
7. Skvara, F.; Kolar, K.; Novotny, J.; and Zadak, Z., “The Effect of Cement Particle Size Distribution upon Properties of Pastes and Mortars with Low Water-to-Cement Ratio,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 11, No. 2, 1981, pp. 247-255. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(81)90066-1
8. Assaad, J., and Issa, C., “Effect of Clinker Grinding Aids on Flow of Cement-Based Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 63, 2014, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.04.006
9. Delagrammatikas, G., and Tsimas, S., “Grinding Process Simulation Based on Rosin-Rammler Equation,” Chemical Engineering Communications, V. 191, No. 10, 2004, pp. 1362-1378. doi: 10.1080/00986440490472625
10. Ferraris, C.; Hackley, V.; Avilés, A.; and Buchanan, C., “Analysis of the ASTM Round-Robin Test on Particle Size Distribution of Portland Cement: Phase I,” National Institute of Standards and Technology Report No. 6883, Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 2002, 100 pp.
11. Arteaga-Arcos, J. C.; Chimal-Valencia, O. A.; Hernández, D. J. D.; Madeira, H. T. Y.; and Torre, S. D., “High-Energy Ball Mill Parameters Used to Obtain Ultra-Fine Portland Cement at Laboratory Level,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 108, No. 4, July-Aug. 2011, pp. 371-377.
12. Bouzoubaa, N.; Zhang, M. H.; Malhotra, V. M.; and Golden, D. M., “Blended Fly Ash Cements—A Review,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 96, No. 6, Nov.-Dec.1999, 10 pp.
13. Assaad, J., and Asseily, S., “Use of Water Reducers to Improve Grindability and Performance of Portland Cement Clinker,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 108, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2011, pp. 619-627.
14. Assaad, J. J.; Asseily, S.; and Harb, J., “Effect of Specific Energy Consumption on Fineness of Portland Cement Incorporating Amine and Glycol-Based Grinding Aids,” Materials and Structures, V. 42, No. 8, 2009, pp. 1077-1087. doi: 10.1617/s11527-008-9444-0
15. ASTM C150-12, “Standard Specification for Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 10 pp.
16. Katsioti, M.; Tsakiridis, P. E.; Giannatos, P.; Tsibouki, Z.; and Marinos, J., “Characterization of Various Cement Grinding Aids and Their Impact on Grindability and Cement Performance,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 23, No. 5, 2009, pp. 1954-1959. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.003
17. Schneider, M.; Romer, M.; Tschudin, M.; and Bolio, H., “Sustainable Cement Production—Present and Future,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 41, No. 7, 2011, pp. 642-650. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019
18. Fredvik, T. I., “Initial Strength Development of Fly Ash and Limestone Blended Cements at Various Temperatures Predicted by Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity,” PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2005, 112 pp.
19. Maxson, W. L.; Cadena, F.; and Bond, F. C., “Grindability of Various Ores,” Transaction of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, V. 112, 1934, pp. 130-146.
20. ASTM C465-00, “Standard Specification for Processing Additions for Use in the Manufacture of Hydraulic Cements,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000, 8 pp.
21. Bond, F. C., “The Third Theory of Comminution,” Transaction AIME (Mining), V. 193, 1952, pp. 484-494.
22. Man, Y. T., “Why is the Bond Ball Mill Grindability Test Done the Way it is Done?” The European Journal of Mineral Processing and Environmental Protection, V. 2, No. 1, 2002, pp. 34-39.
23. ASTM C204-11, “Standard Test Methods for Fineness of Hydraulic Cement by Air-Permeability Apparatus,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, 6 pp.
24. ASTM C187-11e1, “Standard Test Method for Amount of Water Required for Normal Consistency of Hydraulic Cement Paste,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, 4 pp.
25. ASTM C191-08, “Standard Test Methods for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008, 5 pp.
26. ASTM C109-12, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 9 pp.
27. Assaad, J. J., “Quantifying the Effect of Clinker Grinding Aids under Laboratory Conditions,” Minerals Engineering, V. 81, 2015, pp. 40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.07.008