Resistivity Tests for Concrete—Recent Field Experience

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Resistivity Tests for Concrete—Recent Field Experience

Author(s): Jagan Gudimettla and Gary Crawford

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 113

Issue: 4

Appears on pages(s): 505-512

Keywords: bulk resistivity; rapid chloride permeability test; surface resistivity

DOI: 10.14359/51688830

Date: 7/1/2016

Abstract:
This paper analyzed surface resistivity (SR), bulk resistivity (BR), and rapid chloride permeability test (RCPT) data collected from 11 concrete paving field projects from across the country. The data showed that the results from the three tests correlate well and confirms the work performed by previous research on laboratory samples. However, the data indicates that care should be taken when using 28-day SR data in lieu of 56-day RCPT data because they may not correlate well for all mixtures. Depending on the project, the coefficient of variation (COV) for SR and BR for production samples ranged from 5% to 25% with an average of 13% and 12%, respectively. The SR and BR COVs for all the projects were lower than the COV of RCPT. Data showed little to no correlation between 56-day SR with fresh concrete properties and 28-day compressive strength.

Related References:

1. Stanish, K. D.; Hooton, R. D.; and Thomas, M. D. A., “Testing the Chloride Penetration Resistance of Concrete: A Literature Review,” University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1997, 33 pp.

2. ASTM C1202-12, “Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 7 pp.

3. AASHTO T 277-15, “Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2015, 15 pp.

4. TB-0100, “Understanding AASHTO T 277 and ASTM C1202 Rapid Chloride Permeability Test,” Technical Bulletin, Grace Construction Products, Cambridge, MA, 4 pp.

5. Chini, A.; Muszynski, L.; and Hicks, J., “Determination of Acceptance Permeability Characteristics for Performance-Related Specifications for Portland Cement Concrete,” Publication BC 354-41, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 2003, 162 pp.

6. Kessler, R.; Powers, R.; Vivas, E.; Paredes, M.; and Virmani, Y., “Surface Resistivity as an Indicator of Concrete Chloride Penetration Resistance,” 2008 Concrete Bridge Conference, St. Louis, MO, May 4-7, 2008.

7. Rupnow, T., and Icenogle, P. J., “Evaluation of Surface Resistivity Measurements as an Alternative to the Rapid Chloride Permeability Test for Quality Assurance and Acceptance,” Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Project Report, Baton Rouge, LA, July 2011, 68 pp.

8. Ryan, E. W., “Comparison of Two Methods for the Assessment of Chloride Ion Penetration in Concrete: A Field Study,” master’s thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 2011, pp. 42-43.

9. Spragg, R.; Bu, Y.; Snyder, K.; Bentz, D.; and Weiss, J., “Electrical Testing of Cement-Based Materials: Role of Testing Techniques, Sample Conditioning, and Accelerated Curing,” Publication FHWA/IN/JTRP-2013/28, Joint Transportation Research Program, Indian Department of Transportation and Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2013, pp. 1-16.

10. AASHTO TP-95, “Surface Resistivity Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, July 2011.

11. Spragg, R.; Castro, J.; Nantung, T.; Parades, M.; and Weiss, W., “Variability Analysis of the Bulk Resistivity Measured Using Concrete Cylinders,” SPR-3509, FHWA/IN/JTRP-2011, Joint Transportation Research Program, Washington, DC, 2011, pp. 1-8.

12. ASTM C1760-12, “Standard Test Method for Bulk Electrical Conductivity of Hardened Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.

13. Spragg, R.; Villani, C.; Snyder, K.; Bentz, D.; Bullard, J.; and Weiss, J., “Electrical Resistivity Measurements in Cementitious Systems: Observations of Factors that Influence the Measurements,” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2013, pp. 90-98.

14. Tanesi, J., and Ardani, A., “Surface Resistivity Test Evaluation as an Indicator for the Chloride Permeability of Concrete,” FHWA Publication No: FHWA-HRT-13-024, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, VA, 2013.

15. Presuel-Moreno, F.; Suarez, A.; and Liu, Y., “Characterization of New and Old Concrete Structures Using Surface Resistivity Measurements,” Final Report, Department of Ocean and Mechanical Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Dania Beach, FL, Aug. 2010, 279 pp.

16. Henkensiefken, R.; Castro, J.; Bentz, D.; Nantung, T.; and Weiss, J., “Water Absorption in Internally Cured Mortar Made with Water-filled Lightweight Aggregate,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 39, No. 10, 2009, pp. 883-892. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.06.009


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer