Title:
Preconditioning Method for Accelerated Testing of Concrete under Sulfate Attack
Author(s):
Hocine Siad, Mohamed Lachemi, Mustafa Sahmaran, and Khandaker M. Anwar Hossain
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
113
Issue:
4
Appears on pages(s):
493-504
Keywords:
concrete degradation; expansion; microstructure; sulfate attack; test method
DOI:
10.14359/51688705
Date:
7/1/2016
Abstract:
This paper aims to recommend a new supplementary preconditioning procedure that can accelerate the degradation process of concrete specimens when exposed to sulfate attack. Several specimens obtained from 30 and 60 MPa (4.4 and 8.7 ksi) strength concretes were tested. Expansion, mass change, and ultrasonic pulse velocity measurements were conducted for specimens subjected to two primary methods of presaturation using sulfate solution and desiccators, then immersed in sulfate solution. A complementary microstructural analysis was also carried out to define the degradation mechanism. When compared to the control method, which had the same immersion conditions without primary presaturation, test results showed an important acceleration of the degradation process with the use of supplementary preconditioning in desiccators. In addition to the remarkable acceleration in the degradation process, the microstructure study confirmed that the degradation mechanism of concrete specimens subjected to supplementary preconditioning by desiccators reflected the field observations in sulfate attack environments.
Related References:
1. Sahmaran, M.; Erdem, T. K.; and Yaman, I. O., “Sulfate Resistance of Plain and Blended Cements Exposed to Wetting-Drying and Heating-Cooling Environments,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 21, No. 8, 2007, pp. 1771-1778. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.012
2. Sahmaran, M.; Kasap, O.; Duru, K.; and Yaman, I. O., “Effects of Mix Composition and Water-Cement Ratio on the Sulfate Resistance of Blended Cements,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 29, No. 3, 2007, pp. 159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.007
3. Girardi, F.; Vaona, W.; and Di Maggio, R., “Resistance of Different Types of Concretes to Cyclic Sulfuric Acid and Sodium Sulfate Attack,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 32, No. 8, 2010, pp. 595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.07.002
4. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-99) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1999, 353 pp.
5. Chabrelie, A., “Mechanisms of Degradation of Concrete by External Sulfate Ions under Laboratory and Field Conditions,” PhD thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010, 186 pp.
6. ASTM C1012-95a, “Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars Exposed to a Sulfate Solution,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1995, 5 pp.
7. Hooton, R. D., and Brown, P. W., “Development of Test Methods to Address the Various Mechanisms of Sulphate Attack,” Proceedings of Concrete in Aggressive Aqueous Environments, Performance, Testing and Modeling, Toulouse, France, 2009, pp. 280-297.
8. Aleksic, M., “Development and Standardization of the NIST Rapid Sulphate Resistance Test,” master’s thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2010, 178 pp.
9. Bellmann, F.; Moser, B.; and Stark, J., “Influence of Sulfate Solution Concentration on the Formation of Gypsum in Sulfate Resistance Test Specimen,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 2, 2006, pp. 358-363. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.04.006
10. Suleiman, A. R., “Physical Sulphate Attack on Concrete,” master’s thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 2014, 127 pp.
11. Crumbie, A. K., “Characterization of the Microstructure of Concrete,” PhD thesis, University of London, Imperial College, London, UK, 1994, pp. 253-258.
12. Mehta, P. K., “Evaluation of Sulfate Resisting Cements by a New Test Method,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 72, No. 10, Oct. 1975, pp. 573-575.
13. Drimalas, T., “Laboratory and Field Evaluations of External Sulfate Attack,” PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2007, 187 pp.
14. Cohen, M. D., and Mather, B., “Sulfate Attack on Concrete—Research Needs,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 88, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1991, pp. 62-69.
15. Almeida, I. R., “Resistance of High-Strength Concrete to Sulfate Attack: Soaking and Drying Test,” Durability of Concrete, SP-100, J. M. Scanlon, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1991, pp. 1073-1092.
16. Assaad, V. F.; Jofriet, J. C.; Negi, S. C.; and Hayward, G. L., “Laboratory Tests of Sulphide and Sulphate Corrosion of Reinforced Concrete,” Proceedings of the Vth International Symposium on Concrete for a Sustainable Agriculture, El Escorial, Spain, 2005, pp. 179-190.
17. Damidot, D., and Glasser, F. P., “Thermodynamic Investigation of the CaO-Al2O3-CaSO4-H2O System at 50°C and 85°C,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 22, No. 6, 1992, pp. 1179-1191. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(92)90047-Y
18. De Belie, N., “Evaluation of Methods for Testing Concrete Degradation in Aggressive Solutions,” Workshop on Performance of Cement-Based Materials in Aggressive Aqueous Environments—Characterization, Modeling, Test Methods and Engineering Aspects, N. De Belie, ed., Ghent, Belgium, 2007, pp. 63-74.
19. Clifton, J. R.; Frohnsdorff, G.; and Ferraris, C., “Standards for Evaluating the Susceptibility of Cement-Based Materials to External Sulfate Attack,” Materials Science of Concrete, Sulfate Attack Mechanisms, Special Volume, 1999, pp. 337-355.
20. Damidot, D., and Glasser, F. P., “Thermodynamic Investigation of the CaO-Al2O3-CaSO4-K2O-H2O System at 25°C,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 23, No. 5, 1993, pp. 1195-1204. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(93)90180-H
21. Higgins, D. D., “Increased Sulfate Resistance of GGBS Concrete in the Presence of Carbonate,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 25, No. 8, 2003, pp. 913-919. doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00148-3
22. Osborne, G. J., “Durability of Portland Blast-Furnace Slag Cement Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 21, No. 1, 1999, pp. 11-21. doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00032-8
23. Neville, A., “The Confused World of Sulfate Attack on Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 8, 2004, pp. 1275-1296. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.004
24. ASTM C150/C150M-12, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 9 pp.
25. CAN/CSA A3000-08, “Cementitious Materials Compendium,” Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, ON, Canada, 2008, 282 pp.
26. Siad, H.; Kamali-Bernard, S.; Mesbah, H. A.; Escadeillas, G.; Mouli, M.; and Khelafi, H., “Characterization of the Degradation of Self-Compacting Concretes in Sodium Sulfate Environment: Influence of Different Mineral Admixtures,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 47, Oct. 2013, pp. 1188-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.086
27. Neville, A. M., Properties of Concrete, third edition, Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, UK, 1981, pp. 338-344.
28. Sanjuán, M. A., and Muñoz-Martialay, R., “Oven-Drying as a Preconditioning Method for Air Permeability Test on Concrete,” Materials Letters, V. 27, No. 4-5, 1996, pp. 263-268. doi: 10.1016/0167-577X(95)00283-9
29. ASTM C1202-12, “Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 7 pp.
30. ACI Committee 201, “Guide to Durable Concrete (ACI 201.2R-92),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1992, 41 pp.
31. Perruchot, C.; Chehimi, M. M.; Vaulay, M. J.; and Benzarti, K., “Characterization of the Surface Thermodynamic Properties of Cement Components by Inverse Gas Chromatography at Infinite Dilution,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 2, 2006, pp. 305-319. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.02.005
32. Khelifa, R.; Brunetaud, X.; Chabil, H.; and Al-Mukhtar, M., “Conséquences Mécaniques de L’attaque Sulfatique Externe sur les BAP,” SciTechnol Journal, V. 28, 2008, pp. 23-28.
33. Skaropoulou, A.; Kakali, G.; and Tsivilis, S., “Thaumasite Form of Sulfate Attack in Limestone Cement Concrete: The Effect of Cement Composition, Sand Type and Exposure Temperature,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 36, Nov. 2012, pp. 527-533. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.048
34. Santhanam, M.; Cohen, M. D.; and Olek, J., “Effects of Gypsum Formation on the Performance of Cement Mortars during External Sulfate Attack,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 33, No. 3, 2003, pp. 325-332. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00955-9
35. Siad, H.; Lachemi, M.; Bernard, S. K.; Sahmaran, M.; and Hossain, A., “Assessment of the Long-Term Performance of SCC Incorporating Different Mineral Admixtures in a Magnesium Sulphate Environment,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 80, Apr., 2015, pp. 141-154. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.067
36. Scrivener, K. L., “Backscattered Electron Imaging of Cementitious Microstructures Understanding and Quantification,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 26, No. 8, 2004, pp. 935-945. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.029
37. Cohen, M. D., “Modeling of Expansive Cements,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 13, No. 4, 1983, pp. 519-528. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(83)90011-X
38. Divet, L., and Pavoine, A., “Delayed Ettringite Formation in Massive Concrete Structures: An Account of Some Studies of Degraded Bridges,” International RILEM TC-186 ISA, Switzerland, 2002, pp. 98-126.
39. Tian, B., and Cohen, M. D., “Does Gypsum Formation during Sulfate Attack on Concrete Lead to Expansion,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 30, No. 1, 2000, pp. 117-123. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00211-2
40. Mather, B., “Discussion of the Process of Sulfate Attack on Cement Mortars,” Advanced Cement Based Materials, V. 5, No. 3, 1996, pp. 109-110.