High-Strength Reinforcement in Columns under High Shear Stresses

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: High-Strength Reinforcement in Columns under High Shear Stresses

Author(s): Drit Sokoli and Wassim M. Ghannoum

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 113

Issue: 3

Appears on pages(s): 605-614

Keywords: columns; high-strength steel; reinforced concrete; seismic

DOI: 10.14359/51688203

Date: 5/1/2016

Abstract:
This study investigated the performance of seismically detailed concrete columns reinforced with high-strength steel. Columns were subjected to high shear stresses and relatively high axial load to investigate the ability of high-strength reinforcement in maintaining the integrity of concrete shear-transfer mechanisms. Two columns (CS60 and CS80) were respectively reinforced with conventional Grade 60 (420 MPa) and Grade 80 (550 MPa) ASTM A706 bars. A third column, CS100, was reinforced with newly developed Grade 100 (690 MPa) bars. Columns had almost identical reinforcement layouts and flexural strengths. Shear and axial failure occurred at comparable drift levels in CS60 and CS80. CS100 sustained bond degradation around the longitudinal bars at relatively low drifts, raising questions about bar development lengths and allowable lengths of concrete members reinforced with high strength steel. Strain demands in longitudinal and transverse bars were significantly higher in the specimens reinforced with high strength steel.

Related References:

1. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

2. AASHTO, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2014, 2160 pp.

3. NIST, “Use of High-Strength Reinforcement in Earthquake-Resistant Concrete Structures (GCR 14-917-30),” NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2014, 231 pp.

4. Sokoli, D., “Seismic Performance of Concrete Columns Reinforced with High Strength Steel,” master’s thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2014, 166 pp.

5. ATC-115, “Roadmap for the Use of High-Strength Reinforcement in Reinforced Concrete Design,” Applied Technology Council, 2015, 197 pp.

6. Rautenberg, J. M.; Pujol, S.; Tavallali, H.; and Lepage, A., “Drift Capacity of Concrete Columns Reinforced with High Strength Steel,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2013, pp. 307-318.

7. Restrepo, J. I.; Seible, F.; Stephan, B.; and Schoettler, M. J., “Seismic Testing of Bridge Columns Incorporating High-Performance Materials,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 4, July-Aug. 2006, pp. 496-504.

8. FEMA, “Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components (FEMA-461),” Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2007, 138 pp.

9. Sokoli, D.; Shekarchi, W.; Buenrostro, E.; and Ghannoum, W. M., “Advancing Behavioral Understanding and Damage Evaluation of Concrete Members Using High-Resolution Digital Image Correlation Data,” Earthquakes and Structures, V. 7, No. 5, 2014, pp. 609-626. doi: 10.12989/eas.2014.7.5.609

10. ASTM C39/C39M-05, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2005, 7 pp.

11. ASTM A370-14, “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 50 pp.

12. ASTM E8/E8M-13, “Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 29 pp.

13. Sezen, H., and Moehle, J. P., “Seismic Tests of Concrete Columns with Light Transverse Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2006, pp. 842-849.

14. Ghannoum, W. M., and Moehle, J. P., “Shake-Table Tests of a Concrete Frame Sustaining Column Axial Failures,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 109, No. 3, May-June 2012, pp. 393-402.

15. Ghannoum, W. M., and Moehle, J. P., “Dynamic Collapse Analysis of a Concrete Frame Sustaining Column Axial Failures,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 109, No. 3, May-June 2012, pp. 403-412.

16. Brown, J., and Kunnath, S. K., “Low-Cycle Fatigue Failure of Reinforcing Steel Bars,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 101, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2004, pp. 457-466.

17. Slavin, C. M., “Defining Structurally Acceptable Properties of High-Strength Steel Bars through Material Testing,” master’s thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2015, 136 pp.

18. LeBorgne, M., and Ghannoum, W., “Calibrated Analytical Element for Lateral-Strength Degradation of Reinforced Concrete Columns,” Engineering Structures, V. 81, 2014, pp. 35-48. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.030

19. LeBorgne, M., and Ghannoum, W., “Analytical Element for Simulating Lateral-Strength Degradation in Reinforced Concrete Columns and Other Frame Members,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 140, No. 7, 2014, pp. 04014031 1-12.

20. ASCE, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE 41-13),” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2013, 1074 pp.

21. ACI Committee 408, “Bond and Development of Straight Reinforcing Bars in Tension (ACI 408R-03),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2003, 49 pp.

22. Ichinose, T., “Splitting Bond Failure of Columns under Seismic Action,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 1995, pp. 535-542.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer