Revisiting Unreinforced Strut Efficiency Factor

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Revisiting Unreinforced Strut Efficiency Factor

Author(s): Ray Kai Leung Su and Daniel Ting Wee Looi

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 113

Issue: 2

Appears on pages(s): 301-312

Keywords: deep beam; high-strength concrete; node confinement; shear enhancement factor; shear stress limit; strut efficiency factor; strut-and-tie modeling

DOI: 10.14359/51688062

Date: 3/1/2016

Abstract:
A comprehensive experimental study investigating the strut compression strength of deep beams without stirrups by array of varying strut angles and concrete strengths is presented. The specimens were designed to strut failure, eliminating unwarranted coupled failure modes. The discrepancies of dependent parameters in strut efficiency factors were reconciled with provisions in design standards, along with various researchers’ proposals. It was affirmed that a single constant value is best to represent the strut efficiency, echoing the design recommendation in ACI 318-11. Nonetheless, a less-conservative recommendation was put forward based on the experiment and a suite of supplementary filtered database results. A compatible lower-bound shear limit to prevent strut failure was set forth to unify the strut strength and sectional shear stress limit through a generic linear shear enhancement factor. This model was found to be robust and conservative for a wide range of concrete strengths and strut angles.

Related References:

1. Reineck, K. H., and Todisco, L., “Database of Shear Tests for Non-Slender Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrups,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2014, pp. 1363-1372. doi: 10.14359/51686820

2. Tuchscherer, R. G.; Birrcher, D. B.; Williams, C. S.; Deschenes, D. J.; and Bayrak, O., “Evaluation of Existing Strut-and-Tie Methods and Recommended Improvements,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2014, pp. 1451-1460.

3. Yun, Y. M., and Ramirez, J. A., “Strength of Struts and Nodes in Strut-Tie Model,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 122, No. 1, 1996, pp. 20-29. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:1(20)

4. Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 445, “Recent Approaches to Shear Design of Structural Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 124, No. 12, 1998, pp. 1375-1417. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:12(1375)

5. Su, R. K. L., and Chandler, A. M., “Design Criteria for Unified Strut-and-Tie Models,” Progress in Structural Engineering, V. 3, No. 3, 2001, pp. 288-298. doi: 10.1002/pse.88

6. Foster, S. J., and Malik, A. R., “Evaluation of Efficiency Factor Models Used in Strut-and-Tie Modeling of Nonflexural Members,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 128, No. 5, 2002, pp. 569-577. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:5(569)

7. Rogowsky, D. M., and MacGregor, J. G., “Shear Strength of Deep Reinforced Concrete Continuous Beams,” Structural Engineering Report, V. 110, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1983, 192 pp.

8. Marti, P., “Basic Tools of Reinforced Concrete Beam Design,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 82, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1985, pp. 46-56.

9. Rogowsky, D. M., and MacGregor, J. G., “Design of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams,” Concrete International, V. 8, No. 8, Aug. 1986, pp. 49-58.

10. Schlaich, J.; Schafer, K.; and Jennewein, M., “Toward a Consistent Design of Structural Concrete,” PCI Journal, V. 32, No. 3, 1987, pp. 74-150. doi: 10.15554/pcij.05011987.74.150

11. Nielsen, M. P.; Braestrup, M. W.; Jensen, B. C.; and Bach, F., “Concrete Plasticity, Beam Shear in Joints—Punching Shear,” Special Publication, V. 129, Danish Society for Structural Science and Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 1978.

12. Hwang, S. J., and Lee, H. J., “Strength Prediction for Discontinuity Regions by Softened Strut-and-Tie Model,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 128, No. 12, 2002, pp. 1519-1526. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:12(1519)

13. Foster, S. J., and Gilbert, R. I., “The Design of Nonflexural Members with Normal and High-Strength Concretes,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 93, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1996, pp. 3-10.

14. Matamoros, A. B., and Wong, K. H., “Design of Simply Supported Deep Beams Using Strut-and-Tie Models,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 100, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2003, pp. 704-712.

15. MacGregor, J. G., Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design, third edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997, 958 pp.

16. Warwick, W., and Foster, S. J., “Investigation into the Efficiency Factor Used in Nonflexural Member Design,” UNICIV Report No. R-320, Kensington: School of Civil Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 1993.

17. Brown, M. D., and Bayrak, O., “Design of Deep Beams Using Strut-and-Tie Models—Part II: Design Recommendations,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 4, July-Aug. 2008, pp. 405-413.

18. Collins, M. P., and Mitchell, D., “Rational Approach to Shear Design—The 1984 Canadian Code Provisions,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 83, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1986, pp. 925-933.

19. Comite Euro-international du Beton, “Bulletin d’information No. 213/214, CEB-FIP Model Code 1990,” Thomas Telford, London, UK, 1993.

20. Sahoo, D. K.; Singh, B.; and Bhargava, P., “An Appraisal of Design Provisions for Bottle-Shaped Struts,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 64, No. 7, 2012, pp. 647-656. doi: 10.1680/macr.11.00141

21. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-11) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2011, 503 pp.

22. British Standards Institution (BSI), “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” UK: BSI, 2004, 225 pp.

23. Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P., “The Modified Compression Field Theory for Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 83, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1986, pp. 219-231.

24. Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P., “Compression Response of Cracked Reinforced Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 119, No. 12, 1993, pp. 3590-3610. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3590)

25. Kaufmann, W., and Marti, P., “Structural Concrete: Cracked Membrane Model,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 124, No. 12, 1998, pp. 1467-1475. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:12(1467)

26. Canadian Standards Association (CSA), “Design of Concrete Structures (CAN3-A23.3M94), Structural Design,” Toronto, ON, Canada, 1994.

27. Brown, M. D.; Sankovich, C. L.; Bayrak, O.; and Jirsa, J. O., “Behavior and Efficiency of Bottle-Shaped Struts,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 3, May-June 2006, pp. 348-355.

28. Quintero-Febres, C. G.; Parra-Montesinos, G.; and Wight, J. K., “Strength of Struts in Deep Concrete Members Designed Using Strut-and-Tie Method,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 4, July-Aug. 2006, pp. 577-586.

29. Foster, S. J., and Gilbert, R. I., “Experimental Studies on High-Strength Concrete Deep Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 95, No. 4, July-Aug. 1998, pp. 382-390.

30. Moody, K. G.; Viest, I. M.; Elstner, R. C.; and Hognestad, E., “Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beams, Part 1—Tests of Simple Beams,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 51, No. 12, Dec. 1954, pp. 317-332.

31. Sahoo, D. K.; Singh, B.; and Bhargava, P., “An Appraisal of the ACI Strut Efficiency Factors,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 61, No. 6, 2009, pp. 445-456. doi: 10.1680/macr.2008.00112

32. Smith, K. N., and Vantsiotis, A. S., “Shear Strength of Deep Beams,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 79, No. 3, Mar. 1982, pp. 201-213.

33. Yang, K. H.; Chung, H. S.; Lee, E. T.; and Eun, H. C., “Shear Characteristics of High-Strength Concrete Deep Beams without Shear Reinforcements,” Engineering Structures, V. 25, No. 10, 2003, pp. 1343-1352. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00110-X


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer