Effect of Vertical Casting Position on Transfer and Development Length

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Effect of Vertical Casting Position on Transfer and Development Length

Author(s): J. Chris Carroll, Carin L. Roberts-Wollmann, and Thomas E. Cousins

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 112

Issue: 5

Appears on pages(s): 619-630

Keywords: bond; development length; prestressing strand; top-strand effect; transfer length; vertical casting position

DOI: 10.14359/51687852

Date: 9/1/2015

Abstract:
This investigation includes the effect of vertical casting position on transfer and development lengths of prestressing strand. Current code provisions account for the top-bar effect in the calculation of development length for standard reinforcing bars, but fail to recognize the phenomenon when calculating transfer and development lengths of prestressing strand. Historically, this phenomenon has been dependent on the amount of concrete cast below a bar or strand. Recent research shows the amount of concrete cast above a strand to be more influential. This paper presents the results of an experimental investigation on the influence of vertical casting position of prestressing strand on transfer and development lengths. The study includes data from 20 T-beam test specimens and four sets of top-strand blocks. The results from 119 transfer zones and 39 flexural tests were evaluated and compared to vertical casting position along with current code provisions.

Related References:

1. Clark, A. P., “Comparative Bond Efficiency of Deformed Concrete Reinforcing Bars,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 43, No. 11, Nov. 1946, pp. 381-400.

2. Jirsa, J. O., and Breen, J. E., “Influence of Casting Position and Shear on Development and Splice Length—Design Recommendations,” Research Report 242-3F, Center for Transportation Research, Bureau of Engineering Research, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, Nov. 1981, 54 pp.

3. Jeanty, P. R.; Mitchell, D.; and Mirza, M. S., “Investigation of ‘Top Bar’ Effects in Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 85, No. 3, May-June 1988, pp. 251-257.

4. Buckner, C. D., “A Review of Strand Development Length for Pretensioned Concrete Members,” PCI Journal, V. 40, No. 2, 1995, pp. 84-105. doi: 10.15554/pcij.03011995.84.105

5. Petrou, M. F.; Wan, B.; Joiner, W. S.; Trezos, C. G.; and Harries, K. A., “Excessive Strand End Slip in Prestressed Piles,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 97, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2000, pp. 774-782.

6. Wan, B.; Harries, K.; and Petrou, M. F., “Transfer Length of Strands in Prestressed Concrete Piles,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 99, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2002, pp. 577-585.

7. Wan, B.; Petrou, M. F.; Harries, K. A.; and Hussein, A. A., “Top Bar Effects in Prestressed Concrete Piles,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 99, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2002, pp. 208-214.

8. Larson, K. H.; Peterman, R. J.; and Esmaeily, A., “Bond Characteristics of Self-Consolidating Concrete for Prestressed Bridge Girders,” PCI Journal, V. 52, No. 4, 2007, pp. 44-57. doi: 10.15554/pcij.07012007.44.57

9. Peterman, R. J., “The Effects of As-Cast Depth and Concrete Fluidity on Strand Bond,” PCI Journal, V. 52, No. 3, 2007, pp. 72-101. doi: 10.15554/pcij.05012007.72.101

10. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-11) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2011, 503 pp.

11. AASHTO, AASHTO Load Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications, sixth edition, American Society of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2012, pp. 5-168.

12. Janney, J. R., “Nature of Bond in Pre-Tensioned Prestressed Concrete,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 50, No. 5, May 1954, pp. 717-736.

13. Hanson, N. W., and Kaar, P. H., “Flexural Bond Tests of Pretensioned Prestressed Beams,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 55, No. 1, Jan. 1959, pp. 783-802.

14. Kaar, P. H.; LaFraugh, R. W.; and Mass, M. A., “Influence of Concrete Strength on Strand Transfer Length,” PCI Journal, V. 8, No. 5, 1963, pp. 47-67. doi: 10.15554/pcij.10011963.47.67

15. Tabatabai, H., and Dickson, T. J., “The History of the Prestressing Strand Development Length Equation,” PCI Journal, V. 38, No. 6, 1993, pp. 64-75. doi: 10.15554/pcij.11011993.64.75

16. Martin, L. D., and Scott, N. L., “Development of Prestressing Strand in Pretensioned Members,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 73, No. 8, Aug. 1976, pp. 453-456.

17. Zia, P., and Mostafa, T., “Development Length of Prestressing Strands,” PCI Journal, V. 22, No. 5, 1977, pp. 54-65. doi: 10.15554/pcij.09011977.54.65

18. Cousins, T. E.; Johnston, D. W.; and Zia, P., “Transfer and Development Length of Epoxy Coated and Uncoated Prestressing Strand,” PCI Journal, V. 35, No. 4, 1990, pp. 92-103. doi: 10.15554/pcij.07011990.92.103

19. Shahawy, M. A.; Issa, M.; and Batchelor, B. D., “Strand Transfer Length in Full Scale AASHTO Prestressed Concrete Girders,” PCI Journal, V. 37, No. 3, 1992, pp. 84-96. doi: 10.15554/pcij.05011992.84.96

20. Mitchell, D.; Cook, W. D.; Khan, A. A.; and Tham, T., “Influence of High Strength Concrete on Transfer and Development Length of Pretensioning Strand,” PCI Journal, V. 38, No. 3, 1993, pp. 52-66. doi: 10.15554/pcij.05011993.52.66

21. Deatherage, J. H., and Burdette, E. G., “Development Length and Lateral Spacing Requirements of Prestressing Strand for Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders,” PCI Journal, V. 39, No. 1, 1994, pp. 70-83. doi: 10.15554/pcij.01011994.70.83

22. Russell, B. W., and Burns, N. H., “Measurement of Transfer Lengths on Pretensioned Concrete Elements,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 123, No. 5, 1997, pp. 541-549. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:5(541)

23. Lane, S. N., “A New Development Length Equation for Pretensioned Strands in Bridge Beams and Piles,” Research Report FHWA-RD-98-116, Structures Division, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, 1998, 131 pp.

24. Barnes, R. W.; Grove, J. W.; and Burns, N. H., “Experimental Assessment of Factors Affecting Transfer Length,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 100, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2003, pp. 740-748.

25. Kose, K. M., and Burkett, W. R., “Formulation of New Development Length Equation for 0.6 in. Prestressing Strand,” PCI Journal, V. 50, No. 5, 2005, pp. 96-105. doi: 10.15554/pcij.09012005.96.105

26. Ramirez, J. A., and Russell, B. W., “Transfer, Development, and Splice Length for Strand/Reinforcement in High-Strength Concrete,” Research Report 12-60, National Cooperative Highway Research Project, Washington, DC, 2007, 431 pp.

27. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-51),” American Concrete Institute, Famington Hills, MI, 1951, 58 pp.

28. Petrou, M. F.; Wan, B.; Gadala-Maria, F.; Kolli, V. G.; and Harries, K. A., “Influence of Mortar Rheology on Aggregate Settlement,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 97, No. 4, July-Aug. 2000, pp. 479-485.

29. ENV 1992-1-1, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004, 225 pp.

30. Loflin, B. J., “Bond and Material Properties of Grade 270 and Grade 300 Prestressing Strands,” master’s thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, June 2008, 170 pp.

31. Logan, D. R., “Acceptance Criteria for Bond Quality of Strand for Pretensioned Prestressed Concrete Applications,” PCI Journal, V. 42, No. 2, 1997, pp. 52-90. doi: 10.15554/pcij.03011997.52.90

32. Russell, B. W., and Burns, N. H., “Design Guidelines for Transfer, Development and Debonding of Large Diameter Seven Wire Strands in Pretensioned Concrete Girders,” Research Report 1210-5F, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 1993, 300 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer