Corrosion Performance of Prestressing Strands in Contact with Dissimilar Grouts

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Corrosion Performance of Prestressing Strands in Contact with Dissimilar Grouts

Author(s): Matthew O’Reilly, David Darwin, and JoAnn Browning

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 112

Issue: 4

Appears on pages(s): 491-500

Keywords: chlorides; corrosion; grout; macrocell; prestressing strands

DOI: 10.14359/51687751

Date: 7/1/2015

Abstract:
Anti-bleed grouts are often used to fill voids in post-tensioning ducts that result from bleeding and shrinkage of older portland cement grouts. This repair, however, exposes the strands to environmental differences from dissimilar grouts, differences that may cause rapid corrosion. Portland-cement grout, gypsum grout, and four commercially available prepackaged grouts were analyzed to determine the chemical composition of the resulting pore solutions and tested to determine the potential for accelerated corrosion. Grouts and simulated pore solutions were paired to evaluate their potential to cause corrosion of, respectively, grout-encased and bare prestressing strands using the rapid macrocell test. Strands were also evaluated in simulated pore solutions containing chlorides and in deionized water. Unprotected prestressing strands can exhibit rapid corrosion. Gypsum grout, with its low pH and high sulfate content, will cause accelerated corrosion of strands when used in conjunction with any of the other grouts tested. None of the prepackaged grouts resulted in significant corrosion when used in conjunction with portland-cement grout. The highest corrosion measured for a prepackaged grout occurred for the grout with the highest pore solution sulfate content.

Related References:

Al-Amoudi, O. S. B., 2007, “Protection of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Chloride-Sulfate Exposures,” Report No. 279, Corrosion 2007, NACE, pp. 072791-0727916.

ASTM A416/A416M-10, 2010, “Standard Specification for Steel Strand, Uncoated Seven-Wire for Prestressed Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 5 pp.

ASTM A955/A955M-10, 2010, “Standard Specification for Plain and Deformed Stainless-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 11 pp.

Barneyback, R. Jr., and Diamond, S., 1981, “Expression and Analysis of Pore Fluids from Hardened Cement Pastes and Mortars,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 11, No. 2, Mar., pp. 279-285. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(81)90069-7

Darwin, D.; Browning, J.; Nguyen, T. V.; and Locke, C. E., 2002, “Mechanical and Corrosion Properties of a High-Strength, High Chromium Reinforcing Steel for Concrete,” SM Report No. 66, University of Kansas Center for Research, Lawrence, KS, 142 pp.

Hooton, R. D.; Al-Amoudi, O. S. B.; Rasheeduzzafar, A.-A.; Maslehuddin, M.; and Abduljauwad, S. N., 1994, “Influence of Sulfate Ions on Chloride-Induced Reinforcement Corrosion in Portland and Blended Cement Concretes,” Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, V. 16, No. 1, June, pp. 3-11. doi: 10.1520/CCA10555J

Jones, D., 1996, Principles and Prevention of Corrosion, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 572 pp.

O’Reilly, M.; Darwin, D.; and Browning, J., 2012, “Corrosion Performance of Prestressing Strands in Contact with Dissimilar Grouts,” SL Report 12-1, University of Kansas Center for Research, Lawrence, KS, 46 pp.

O’Reilly, M.; Darwin, D.; Browning, J. P.; and Locke, C. E., 2011, “Evaluation of Multiple Corrosion Protection Systems for Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks,” SM Report No. 100, University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc., Lawrence, KS, 535 pp.

PB Americas, 2010, “US-54 CBD Viaducts Limited Site Investigation,” Final Report, Parts 1.3 and 1.4, 130 pp.

Shi, J., and Sun, W., 2011, “Effect of Sulfate Ions on the Corrosion Behavior of Steel in Concrete Using Electrochemical Methods,” Advanced Materials Research, V. 163-167, pp. 3049-3054. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.163-167.3049

Sprinkel, M., and Napier, C. S., 2008, “VDOT Experience with Grouted Tendons in Varina-Enon Precast Segmental Post-tensioned Bridge,” Virginia Concrete Conference.

Sturgeon, W. J.; O’Reilly, M.; Darwin, D.; and Browning, J. P., 2010, “Rapid Macrocell Tests of ASTM A775, A615, and A1035 Reinforcing Bars,” SL Report 10-4, University of Kansas Center for Research, Lawrence, KS, 46 pp.

Trejo, D.; Hueste, M. B. D.; Gardoni, P.; Pillai, R. G.; Reinschmidt, K.; Im, S. B.; Kataria, S.; Hurlebaus, S.; Gambel, M.; and Ngo, T. T., 2009, “Effect of Voids in Grouted, Post-Tensioned Concrete Bridge Construction: Volume 2—Inspection, Repair, Materials, and Risks,” FHWA Report No. FHWA/TX-09/0-4588-1 Vol. 2, 342 pp.

Türkmen, İ., and Gavgalı, M., 2003, “Influence of Mineral Admixtures on the Some Properties and Corrosion of Steel Embedded in Sodium Sulfate Solution of Concrete,” Materials Letters, V. 57, No. 21, pp. 3222-3233. doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00039-9

Xing, L.; Darwin, D.; and Browning, J. P., 2010, “Evaluation of Multiple Corrosion Protection Systems and Corrosion Inhibitors for Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks,” SM Report No. 99, University of Kansas Center for Research, Lawrence, KS, 507 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer