Flexural Behavior of Ultra-High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Moment Connection for Precast Concrete Decks

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Flexural Behavior of Ultra-High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Moment Connection for Precast Concrete Decks

Author(s): Jun Ki Lee and Seung Hoon Lee

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 112

Issue: 4

Appears on pages(s): 451-462

Keywords: closure pour; deck; joint; precast concrete; splice length; steel fiber; ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete

DOI: 10.14359/51687657

Date: 7/1/2015

Abstract:
This paper presents an experimental investigation of the flexural behavior of precast concrete moment connections filled with ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC). The experimental program consisted of two phases. First, the bonding performance of steel reinforcing bars embedded in the UHPFRC was evaluated using lap-spliced beam specimens with three different volumes of steel fibers. Second, the flexural behavior of the UHPFRC moment connections was investigated using 14 precast concrete beam specimens. The precast connections had a narrow joint width ranging from 250 to 100 mm (10 to 4 in.) and included three feasible noncontact splice details: straight bars, 90-degree hooked bars, and U-loop bars. Test results demonstrated the remarkable bonding characteristics of UHPFRC. The precast specimens with a joint width larger than 150 mm (6 in.) exhibited flexural behavior equivalent to that of a monolithic concrete beam specimen. Also, the anchorage provided by the hooked bars and U-loop bars did not appreciably contribute to the bonding strength.

Related References:

1. Li, L.; Ma, Z. J.; and Oesterle, R. G., “Improved Longitudinal Joint Details in Decked Bulb Tees for Accelerated Bridge Construction: Fatigue Evaluation,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 15, No. 5, 2010, pp. 511-522. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000097

2. Au, A.; Lam, C.; and Tharmabala, B., “Investigation of Closure-Strip Details for Connection Prefabricated Deck System,” PCI Journal, V. 56, No. 3, 2011, pp. 75-93. doi: 10.15554/pcij.06012011.75.93

3. Ryu, H.; Kim, Y.; and Chang, S., “Experimental Study on Static and Fatigue Strength of Loop Joint,” Engineering Structures, V. 29, June 2009, pp. 145-162.

4. Ma, Z. J.; Cao, Q.; Chapman, C. E.; Burdette, E. G.; and French, C. E. W., “Longitudinal Joint Details with Tight Bend Diameter U-Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 109, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2012, pp. 815-824.

5. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-11) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2011, 503 pp.

6. Magureanu, C.; Sosa, I.; Negrutiu, C.; and Heghes, B., “Mechanical Properties and Durability of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 109, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2012, pp. 177-184.

7. Oesterlee, C., “Structural Response of Reinforced UHPFRC and RC Composite Members,” PhD dissertation, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010, pp. 37-45.

8. Holschemacher, K.; Weiße, D.; and Klotz, S., “Bond of Reinforcement in Ultra High-Strength Concrete,” Seventh International Symposium on the Utilization of High-Strength/High-Performance Concrete, SP-228, H. G. Russell, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2005, pp. 513-528.

9. Jungwirth, J., and Muttoni, A., “Structural Behavior of Tension Members in Ultra High Performance Concrete,” International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete, Kassel, Germany, 2004, pp. 533-544.

10. Graybeal, B. A., “Behavior of Field-Cast Ultra-High Performance Concrete Bridge Deck Connections under Cyclic and Static Structural Loading,” FHWA-HRT-11-023, Nov. 2010, pp. 1-106.

11. Graybeal, B. A., “Fatigue Response of an Ultra-High Performance Concrete Field-Cast Bridge Deck Connection,” TRB Annual Meeting, 2011.

12. ASTM C39/C39M-09a, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009, 7 pp.

13. ASTM C 469/C469M-10, “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010, 5 pp.

14. ASTM C1609/C1609M-06, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam with Third-Point Loading),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006, 9 pp.

15. “Korean Highway Design Specification and Commentary,” Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 2008, 586 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer