DESIGN IMPLICATIONS OF A LARGE-SCALE SHAKING TABLE TEST ON A FOUR-STORY REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: DESIGN IMPLICATIONS OF A LARGE-SCALE SHAKING TABLE TEST ON A FOUR-STORY REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING

Author(s): T. Nagae, W. M. Ghannoum, J. Kwon, K. Tahara, K. Fukuyama, T. Matsumori, H. Shiohara, T. Kabeyasawa, S. Kono, M. Nishiyama, R. Sause, J. W. Wallace, and J. P. Moehle

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 112

Issue: 2

Appears on pages(s): 135-146

Keywords: collapse; damage; design; full-scale; moment frame; multistory; shake table; shear wall.

DOI: 10.14359/51687421

Date: 3/1/2015

Abstract:
A full-scale, four-story, reinforced concrete building designed in accordance with the current Japanese seismic design code was tested under multi-directional shaking on the E-Defense shake table. A two-bay moment frame system was adopted in the longer plan direction and a pair of multi-story walls was incorporated in the exterior frames in the shorter plan direction. Minor adjustments to the designs were made to bring the final structure closer to U.S. practice and thereby benefit a broader audience. The resulting details of the test building reflected most current U.S. seismic design provisions. The structure remained stable throughout the series of severe shaking tests, even though lateral story drift ratios exceeded 0.04. The structure did, however, sustain severe damage in the walls and beam-column joints. Beams and columns showed limited damage and maintained core integrity throughout the series of tests. Implications of test results for the seismic design provisions of ACI 318-11 are discussed.

Related References:

ACI Committee 318, 2011, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-11) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 503 pp.

AIJ, 1999, “Design Guidelines for Earthquake Resistant Reinforced Concrete Buildings Based on the Inelastic Displacement Concept,” Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 440 pp. (in Japanese)

AIJ, 2010, “Standard for Structural Calculation of Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 526 pp. (in Japanese)

ASCE/SEI Committee 41, 2007a, “Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Structures (ASCE/SEI 41-06),” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 428 pp.

ASCE/SEI Committee 41, 2007b, “Supplement to Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-06),” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 428 pp.

ASCE/SEI Committee 7, 2010, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10),” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 636 pp.

CSA A23.3-04, 2004, “Design of Concrete Structures,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 258 pp.

Kabeyasawa, T.; Shiohara, H.; and Otani, S., 1984, “U.S.-Japan Cooperative Research on R/C Full-Scale Building Test, Part 5: Discussion of Dynamic Response System,” Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA, pp. 627-634.

MLIT, 2007, “Technological Standard Related to Structures of Buildings,” Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism, Tokyo, Japan.

Nagae, T.; Tahara, K.; Fukuyama, K.; Matsumori, T.; Shiohara, H.; Kabeyasawa, T.; Kono, S.; Nishiyama, M.; and Nishiyama, I., 2011a, “Large-Scale Shaking Table Tests on A Four-Story RC Building,” Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, V. 76, No. 669, pp. 1961-1970. doi: (Transactions of AIJ)10.3130/aijs.76.1961

Nagae, T.; Tahara, K.; Taiso, M.; Shiohara, H.; Kabeyasawa, T.; Kono, S.; Nishiyama, M.; Wallace, J. W.; Ghannoum, W. M.; Moehle, J. P.; Sause, R.; Keller, W.; and Tuna, Z., 2011b, “Design and Instrumentation of the 2010 E-Defense Four-Story Reinforced Concrete and Post-Tensioned Concrete Buildings,” PEER Report 2011/104, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), Berkeley, CA, 261 pp.

NEEShub Project 2011-1005, “U.S. Instrumentation and Data Processing for the Four-Story Reinforced Concrete and Post-Tensioned E-Defense Building Tests,” The George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, https://nees.org/warehouse/report/project/1005. (last accessed Feb. 2014)

NZS3101, Part 1:2006, 2006a, “Concrete Structures Standard: Part 1—The Design of Concrete Structures,” Standards Association of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 309 pp.

NZS3101, Part 2:2006, 2006b, “Concrete Structures Standard—Commentary,” Standards Association of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 397 pp.

Tuna, Z., 2012, “Seismic Performance, Modeling, and Failure Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Buildings,” PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 298 pp.

Wallace, J. W., 2012, “Behavior, Design, and Modeling of Structural Walls and Coupling Beams—Lessons from Recent Laboratory Tests and Earthquakes,” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, V. 6, No. 1, pp. 3-18. doi: 10.1007/s40069-012-0001-4


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer