Title:
PERFORATED HYBRID PRECAST SHEAR WALLS FOR SEISMIC REGIONS
Author(s):
Brian J. Smith, Yahya C. Kurama, and Michael J. McGinnis
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
112
Issue:
3
Appears on pages(s):
359-370
Keywords:
horizontal joints; hybrid; openings; perforated; perforations; post-tensioned; precast; prestressed; seismic; shear walls
DOI:
10.14359/51687410
Date:
5/1/2015
Abstract:
This paper discusses the behavior of two 0.4-scale multi-panel
hybrid precast concrete shear wall test specimens with large rectangular perforations (that is, openings) under combined lateral and gravity loading. The wall system used a combination of mild steel (to provide energy dissipation) and unbonded post-tensioning steel (to provide self-centering) for lateral resistance across horizontal joints. The paper compares the measured global and local behaviors of the walls with design and analytical predictions. The panel perforations,
which varied in size between the two specimens, performed
as expected and did not significantly affect the global behavior of the walls. One of the specimens satisfied the ACI ITG-5.1 performance validation criteria for “special” reinforced concrete shear walls, but the other specimen experienced full uplift at the base joint due to a greater contribution from the energy-dissipating mild steel to the total base moment resistance of the wall. These results are used to make recommendations for the seismic design and analysis of hybrid precast shear walls with large panel perforations.
Related References:
1. Priestley, M., “Overview of PRESSS Research Program,” PCI Journal, V. 36, No. 4, 1991, pp. 50-57. doi: 10.15554/pcij.07011991.50.57
2. Kurama, Y.; Sause, R.; Pessiki, S.; and Lu, L., “Seismic Response Evaluation of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 99, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2002, pp. 641-651.
3. Perez, F.; Sause, R.; and Pessiki, S., “Analytical and Experimental Lateral Load Behavior of Unbonded Posttensioned Precast Concrete Walls,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 133, No. 11, 2007, pp. 1531-1540. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1531)
4. Restrepo, J., “Self-Centering Precast Post-Tensioned Cantilever Walls: Theory and Experimental Work,” ASCE Structures Congress, Seattle, WA, 2003.
5. Priestley, M.; Sritharan, S.; Conley, J.; and Pampanin, S., “Preliminary Results and Conclusions from the PRESSS Five-Story Precast Concrete Test Building,” PCI Journal, V. 44, No. 6, 1999, pp. 42-67. doi: 10.15554/pcij.11011999.42.67
6. Perez, F.; Pessiki, S.; and Sause, R., “Lateral Load Behavior of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls with Vertical Joints,” PCI Journal, V. 49, No. 2, 2004, pp. 48-64. doi: 10.15554/pcij.03012004.48.64
7. Kurama, Y., “Seismic Design of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Walls with Supplemental Viscous Damping,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 97, No. 4, July-Aug. 2000, pp. 648-658.
8. Kurama, Y., “Simplified Seismic Design Approach for Friction-Damped Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2001, pp. 705-716.
9. Hawileh, R.; Saqan, E.; and Abdalla, J., “Simplified Optimum Design Procedure for Special Unbonded Posttensioned Split Precast Shear Walls,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 139, No. 2, 2013, pp. 294-299. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000631
10. Holden, T.; Restrepo, J.; and Mander, J., “Seismic Performance of Precast Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Walls,” Journal of Structural Engineering, V. 129, No. 3, 2003, pp. 286-296. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:3(286)
11. Smith, B.; Kurama, Y.; and McGinnis, M., “Design and Measured Behavior of a Hybrid Precast Concrete Wall Specimen for Seismic Regions,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 137, No. 10, 2011, pp. 1052-1062. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000327
12. Smith, B.; Kurama, Y.; and McGinnis, M., “Behavior of Precast Concrete Shear Walls for Seismic Regions: Comparison of Hybrid and Emulative Specimens,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 139, No. 11, 2013, pp. 1917-1927. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000755
13. ACI Innovation Task Group 5, “Acceptance Criteria for Special Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Structural Walls Based on Validation Testing and Commentary (ACI ITG-5.1),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2007, 19 pp.
14. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-11) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2011, 530 pp.
15. ACI Innovation Task Group 5, “Requirements for Design of a Special Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Shear Wall Satisfying ACI ITG-5.1 (ACI ITG-5.2) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2009, 21 pp.
16. Nagae, T.; Tahara, K.; Matsumori, T.; Shiohara, H.; Kabeyasawa, T.; Kono, S.; Nishiyama, M.; Wallace, J.; Ghannoum, W.; Moehle, J.; Sause, R.; Keller, W.; and Tuna, Z., “Design and Instrumentation of 2010 E-Defense Four-Story Reinforced Concrete and Post-Tensioned Concrete Buildings,” PEER Report 2011/103, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, June 2011.
17. Schoettler, M.; Belleri, A.; Zhang, D.; Restrepo, J.; and Fleischman, R., “Preliminary Results of the Shake-Table Testing for Development of a Diaphragm Seismic Design Methodology,” PCI Journal, V. 54, No. 1, 2009, pp. 100-124. doi: 10.15554/pcij.01012009.100.124
18. ASCE 7 Main Committee, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-05),” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2005.
19. Prakash, V.; Powell, G.; and Campbell, S., “DRAIN-2DX Base Program Description and User Guide: Version 1.10,” Report UCB/SEMM-93/17, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 1993.
20. Hibbitt, D.; Karlsson, B.; and Sorenson, P., “Abaqus User’s Manual: Version 6.9,” Dassault Systemes S.A., Waltham, MA, 2009.
21. Smith, B., and Kurama, Y., “Seismic Design Guidelines for Solid and Perforated Hybrid Precast Concrete Shear Walls,” PCI Journal, V. 59, No. 3, 2014, pp. 43-59.