Title:
In-Place Performance of Severely Deteriorated Pervious Concrete: A Case Study
Author(s):
Yail J. Kim, Shahlaa Al Wakeel, Adel Gaddafi, and Young-Jin Cha
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
112
Issue:
2
Appears on pages(s):
295-304
Keywords:
case study; friction; pervious concrete; profile; surface characteristic; texture
DOI:
10.14359/51686993
Date:
3/1/2015
Abstract:
This paper presents a case study for examining the in-place performance of pervious concrete in a medium-size parking lot in Denver, CO. Of interest are the surface characteristics and hydraulic properties of the concrete dependent upon the degree of deterioration. Test results include pavement texture depth, skid resistance, surface profile, infiltration, and traffic volume. A statistical approach, analysis of variance, is conducted to evaluate the distinct surface properties of various locations in the parking lot. Mutual independency between the surface texture depth and skid resistance is discussed. A practice-oriented predictive model is proposed to estimate an international roughness index of pervious concrete using a texture depth value and skid resistance. A relationship between the infiltration of the pervious concrete and traffic attributes is established. The performance reliability of the parking lot is evaluated in conjunction with critical rainfall intensity.
Related References:
1. Brown, D., “Pervious Concrete Pavement: A Win-Win System,” Concrete Technology Today, V. 24, No. 2, 2003, pp. 1-3.
2. ACI Committee 522, “Report on Pervious Concrete (ACI 522.R-10) (Reapproved 2011),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2010, 40 pp.
3. Neithalath, N.; Sumanasooriya, M. S.; and Deo, O., “Characterizing Pore Volume, Sizes, and Connectivity in Pervious Concretes for Permeability Prediction,” Materials Characterization, V. 61, No. 8, 2010, pp. 802-813. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2010.05.004
4. Legret, M.; Colandini, V.; and LeMarc, C., “Effects of a Porous Pavement with Reservoir Structure on the Quality of Runoff Water and Soil,” The Science of the Total Environment, V. 189-190, 1996, pp. 335-340. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(96)05228-X
5. Wanielista, M.; Chopra, M.; Spence, J.; and Ballok, C., “Hydraulic Performance Assessment of Pervious Concrete Pavements for Stormwater Management Credit,” Stormwater Management Academy, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 2007, 81 pp.
6. Chopra, M.; Kakuturu, S.; Ballock, C.; Spence, J.; and Wanielista, M., “Effect of Rejuvenation Methods on the Infiltration Rates of Pervious Concrete Pavements,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, V. 15, No. 6, 2010, pp. 426-433. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000117
7. Coughlin, J. P.; Campbell, C. D.; and Mays, D. C., “Infiltration and Clogging by Sand and Clay in a Pervious Concrete Pavement System,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, V. 17, No. 1, 2012, pp. 68-73. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000424
8. CCAA, “Skid Resistance of Residential Concrete Paving Surfaces,” Cement Concrete and Aggregates Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2002, 7 pp.
9. Kokkalis, A. G.; Tsohos, G. H.; and Panagouli, O. K., “Consideration of Fractals Potential in Pavement Skid Resistance Evaluation,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, V. 128, No. 6, 2002, pp. 591-595. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:6(591)
10. Fuentes, L.; Gunaratne, M.; and Hess, D., “Evaluation of the Effect of Pavement Roughness on Skid Resistance,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, V. 136, No. 7, 2010, pp. 640-653. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000118
11. Tennis, P. D.; Lemming, M. L.; and Akers, D. J., “Pervious Concrete Pavement,” Report No. EB302.02, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2004, 32 pp.
12. Yang, J., and Jiang, G., “Experimental Study on Properties of Pervious Concrete Pavement Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 33, No. 3, 2003, pp. 381-386. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00966-3
13. Rohne, R. J., and Izevbekhai, B. I., “MnROAD Cell 64 Pervious Concrete: Third Year Performance Report,” Report No. MN/RC 2009-19, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN, 2009, 64 pp.
14. ASTM E965-96(2006), “Standard Test Method for Measuring Pavement Macrotexture Depth Using a Volumetric Technique,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006, 3 pp.
15. Fwa, T. F., and Ong, G. P., “Wet-Pavement Hydroplaning Risk and Skid Resistance: Analysis,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, V. 134, No. 5, 2008, pp. 182-190. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:5(182)
16. ASTM E303-13, “Standard Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 5 pp.
17. ASTM E950-98(2004), “Standard Test Method for Measuring the Longitudinal Profile Traveled Surfaces with an Accelerometer Established Inertial Profiling Reference,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004, 6 pp.
18. Rens, K. L., and Staley, B., “Rating City and County of Denver Urban Pavement Constructability Using a Profiler,” Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, ASCE, V. 15, No. 1, 2010, pp. 44-49. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000031
19. Ang, A. H. S., and Tang, W. H., Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design: Volume I—Basic Principles, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975, 424 pp.
20. CDOT, “Revision of Sections 106 and 412: Surface Texture of Portland Cement Concrete Pavement,” Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, CO, 2013, 3 pp.
21. Devroye, L., Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1986, 843 pp.
22. Mirza, S. A., and MacGregor, J., G., “A Statistical Study of Variables Affecting the Strength of Reinforced Normal Weight Concrete Members,” Structural Engineering Report No. 58, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1976, 138 pp.
23. UDFCD, Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual: Volume 1, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, CO, 2008.