Flexural Behavior of Ultra-High-Performance Seawater Sea-Sand Concrete Beams Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymers Bars (Prepublished)

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Flexural Behavior of Ultra-High-Performance Seawater Sea-Sand Concrete Beams Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymers Bars (Prepublished)

Author(s): Fen Zhou, Lijuan Li, Yunxing Du, Fei Peng, Deju Zhu

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume:

Issue:

Appears on pages(s):

Keywords: fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP); flexural behavior; ultra-high-performance seawater sea-sand concrete (UHPSSC)

DOI: 10.14359/51749490

Date: 1/19/2026

Abstract:
To promote the application of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars reinforced ultra-high-performance seawater sea-sand concrete (FRP-UHPSSC) structures in marine construction, four-point static bending tests were carried out on 16 FRP-UHPSSC beams with different reinforcement ratios, height of cross-section, and type of FRP bars to investigate the ultimate load-carrying capacity, the midspan deflection, and the failure modes of the beams. The experimental results show that all the test beams are brittle failures, and the failure mode of the beams is shear failure when the ratio of the actual reinforcement ratio to the balanced one is higher than 2.73. Increasing the reinforcement ratio and the beam section height both improve the bending moment at ultimate load and the flexural stiffness at the service limit state. The Steel-FRP composite bars (SFCB) reinforced UHPSSC beams have the maximal bending moment at ultimate load, and the basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) bar reinforced UHPSSC beams have the optimal ductility. The deviation of ultimate bending moment and midspan deflection obtained by the proposed calculation method is reduced from 7.5 to 2.8%, and from 15 to 3%, respectively, compared with current specifications for FRP-reinforced concrete structures.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer