Title:
Experimental Investigation of Size Effect on Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Pile Caps
Author(s):
Lucas Laughery, Toshikatsu Ichinose, Kazuhiko Kasai, Srinivas Mogili, and Shyh-Jiann Hwang
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
121
Issue:
1
Appears on pages(s):
105-117
Keywords:
experimental investigation; pile caps; reinforced concrete; shear strength; size effect; two-way shear
DOI:
10.14359/51739188
Date:
1/1/2024
Abstract:
Engineers design structures based on physics, experiments, and
experience. But due to increasing demands, structures today are
being built at scales that far exceed experience and experimental
testing. Bažant summarized the problem well in 1984: “Most laboratory tests are carried out on a reduced scale, from which generalizations must be made for much larger real structures.” Tall structures often require deep foundations with thick reinforced concrete pile caps. In the United States, pile-cap strength is calculated according to ACI 318 provisions, which now include a size effect factor for concrete shear strength. This factor reduces concrete
unit shear strength in proportion to effective depth for sections
built without minimum shear reinforcement. This strength reduction forces engineers seeking to eliminate vertical ties to either
increase concrete strength or deepen pile caps. But there is a gap
in knowledge. This strength reduction is calibrated to databases
for which tests do not vary across a large scale, and for which key
unitless ratios are not always controlled. The present study fills this
gap by quantifying the strength reduction due to size effect while
controlling other key ratios using new laboratory tests. Experimental tests of tripod pile caps with effective depths of 250, 500, and 1000 mm (9.84, 19.68, and 39.37 in.) are presented. Results showed a reduction of 13% in shear strength from 250 to 500 mm and a total reduction of 14% from 250 to 1000 mm. The findings indicate the new ACI 318-19 size effect factor may underestimate strength for deep pile caps.
Related References:
1. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.
2. Bažant, Z. P., “Size Effect in Blunt Fracture: Concrete, Rock, Metal,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V. 110, No. 4, 1984, pp. 518-535. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518)
3. Bažant, Z. P., and Cao, Z., “Size Effect in Punching Shear Failure of Slabs,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 84, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1987, pp. 44-53.
4. Blévot, J., and Frémy, R., “Semelles sur Pieux: Méthodes de Calculs, Compte Rendu d՚Essais, Dispositions Constructives,” Annales de l՚Institut Technique du Bâtiment et des Travaux Publics, V. 230, Feb. 1967. (in French)
5. Adebar, P., and Zhou, L., “Design of Deep Pile Caps by Strut-and-Tie Models,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 93, No. 4, July-Aug. 1996, pp. 437-448.
6. Miguel-Tortola, L.; Pallarés, L.; and Miguel, P. M., “Punching Shear Failure in Three-Pile Caps: Influence of the Shear Span-Depth Ratio and Secondary Reinforcement,” Engineering Structures, V. 155, 2018, pp. 127-143. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.077
7. Bažant, Z. P.; Yu, Q.; Gerstle, W.; Hanson, J.; and Ju, J. W., “Justification of ACI 446 Proposal for Updating ACI Code Provisions for Shear Design of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 104, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2007, pp. 601-610.
8. Tokyo Tekko Steel, “PLATE-NUT,” Tokyo Tekko Co., Ltd., Oyama, Japan, http://www.tokyotekko.co.jp/en/prd/tekko/nst/nst10.html. (last accessed Nov. 28, 2022)
9. Lin, T.-H.; Chen, P.-C.; and Lin, K.-C., “The Multi-Axial Testing System For Earthquake Engineering Researches,” Earthquakes and Structures, V. 13, No. 2, 2017, pp. 165-176.
10. Nakagami, Y., “Size Effect of Footing Under Two-Way Shear,” master’s thesis, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, Japan, 2020. (in Japanese)
11. Jensen, U. G., and Hoang, L. C., “Collapse Mechanisms and Strength Prediction of Reinforced Concrete Pile Caps,” Engineering Structures, V. 35, 2012, pp. 203-214. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.006
12. JSCE-15, “Standard Specification for Concrete Structures,” Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, 2017, 469 pp.
13. Kim, J.-K.; Yi, S.-T.; Park, C.-K.; and Eo, S.-H., “Size Effect on Compressive Strength of Plain and Spirally Reinforced Concrete Cylinders,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 96, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1999, pp. 88-94.
14. EN 1992-1-1:2004, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004, 227 pp.
15. Bentz, E. C., “Explaining the Riddle of Tension Stiffening Models for Shear Panel Experiments,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 131, No. 9, 2005, pp. 1422-1425. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:9(1422)
16. Mogili, S.; Lin, J.-Y.; and Hwang, S.-J., “Vertical Punching Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Flat Plates without Shear Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 121, No. 1, Jan. 2024. doi: 10.14359/51739193