Seismic Performance of Five-Spiral Concrete Columns with Large-Diameter Longitudinal Reinforcement

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Seismic Performance of Five-Spiral Concrete Columns with Large-Diameter Longitudinal Reinforcement

Author(s): Yu-Chen Ou and Brandon Li

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 120

Issue: 5

Appears on pages(s): 37-47

Keywords: buckling; columns; cyclic test; five-spiral reinforcement; large-diameter bars; multi-spiral reinforcement; reinforced concrete; seismic

DOI: 10.14359/51738834

Date: 9/1/2023

Abstract:
Large-diameter longitudinal reinforcement (D43 [No. 14]) andmulti-spiral reinforcement were examined for use in the construction of concrete columns to reduce labor demand. Two full-scale columns were tested to investigate their seismic performance. The test column was reinforced with large-diameter longitudinal reinforcement (D43 [No. 14]) and the control column with normaldiameter longitudinal reinforcement (D36 [No. 11]). Both columns were laterally confined by five-spiral reinforcement. Test results showed that the seismic performance of the test column was similar to the control column. Both columns showed ductile behavior withgood energy dissipation. Based on the test observations, a buckling model was developed to predict the buckling behavior of longitudinal bars laterally supported by five-spiral reinforcement. Based on the proposed model, it was found that for the same amount and within the practical spacing range of five-spiral reinforcement, the calculated buckling slenderness ratio and hence the compressive stress-strain behavior of D43 (No. 14) bars is similar to that of D36 (No. 11) bars.

Related References:

1. Tanaka, H., and Park, R., “Seismic Design and Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Interlocking Spirals,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 90, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1993, pp. 192-203.

2. McLean, D. I., and Buckingham, G. C., “Seismic Performance of Bridge Columns with Interlocking Spiral Reinforcement,” Report No. WA-RD 357.1, Washington State Transportation Center, Seattle, WA, 1994.

3. Otaki, T., and Kuroiwa, T., “Test of Bridge Columns with Interlocking Spiral Reinforcement and Conventional Rectangular Hoop with Ties,” Reports of the Technological Research Institute, Construction Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan, No. 25, 1999, pp. 33-38.

4. Shito, K.; Igase, Y.; Mizugami, Y.; Ohasi, G.; Miyagi, T.; and Kuroiwa, T., “Seismic Performance of Bridge Columns with Interlocking Spiral/Hoop Reinforcements,” First fib Congress, Osaka, Japan, 2002.

5. Kawashima, K., “Enhancement of Flexural Ductility of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns,” First International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan, 2004, pp. 85-95.

6. Correal, J. F.; Saiidi, M. S.; Sanders, D.; and El-Azazy, S., “Shake Table Studies of Bridge Columns with Double Interlocking Spirals,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 104, No. 4, July-Aug. 2007, pp. 393-401.

7. Yin, S. Y. L.; Wu, T. L.; Liu, T. C.; Sheikh, S. A.; and Wang, R., “Interlocking Spiral Confinement for Rectangular Columns,” Concrete International, V. 33, No. 12, Dec. 2011, pp. 38-45.

8. Yin, S. Y. L.; Wang, J. C.; and Wang, P. H., “Development of Multi-Spiral Confinements in Rectangular Columns for Construction Automation,” Zhongguo Gongcheng Xuekan, V. 35, No. 3, 2012, pp. 309-320. doi: 10.1080/02533839.2012.655528

9. Ou, Y. C.; Li, J. Y.; and Roh, H., “Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Five-Spiral Reinforcement,” Engineering Structures, V. 233, 2021, p. 111929. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111929

10. Wu, T.-L.; Ou, Y.-C.; Yen-Liang Yin, S.; Wang, J.-C.; Wang, P.-H.; and Ngo, S.-H, “Behavior of Oblong and Rectangular Bridge Columns with Conventional Tie and Multi-Spiral Transverse Reinforcement under Combined Axial and Flexural Loading,” Zhongguo Gongcheng Xuekan, V. 36, No. 8, 2013, pp. 980-993. doi: 10.1080/02533839.2012.747047

11. Ou, Y. C.; Ngo, S. H.; Yin, S. Y.; Wang, J. C.; and Wang, P. H., “Shear Behavior of Oblong Bridge Columns with Innovative Seven-Spiral Transverse Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2014, pp. 1339-1349. doi: 10.14359/51686873

12. Ou, Y. C.; Ngo, S. H.; Roh, H.; Yin, S. Y.; Wang, J. C.; and Wang, P. H., “Seismic Performance of Concrete Columns with Innovative Seven- and Eleven-Spiral Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2015, pp. 579-592. doi: 10.14359/51687706

13. Ou, Y. C., and Ngo, S. H., “Discrete Shear Strength of Two- and Seven-Circular-Hoop and Spiral Transverse Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2016, pp. 227-238. doi: 10.14359/51688058

14. CPAMI, “Design Specifications for Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C., 2019.

15. Ichinose, T.; Kanayama, Y.; Inoue, Y.; and Bolander, J. E., Jr., “Size Effect on Bond Strength of Deformed Bars,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 18, No. 7, 2004, pp. 549-558. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.03.014

16. Steuck, K. P.; Eberhard, M. O.; and Stanton, J. F., “Anchorage of Large-Diameter Reinforcing Bars in Ducts,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 106, No. 4, July-Aug. 2009, pp. 506-513. doi: 10.14359/56616

17. Murcia-Delso, J.; Stavridis, A.; and Shing, P. B., “Tension Development Length of Large-Diameter Bars for Severe Cyclic Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2015, pp. 659-669. doi: 10.14359/51687937

18. Murcia-Delso, J.; Liu, Y.; and Shing, P. B., “Required Development Length of Column Reinforcement Extended into Enlarged Pile Shafts,” Seventh National Seismic Conference on Bridges & Highways, Oakland, CA, May 2013.

19. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.

20. Frosch, R. J., “Another Look at Cracking and Crack Control in Reinforced Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 96, No. 3, May-June 1999, pp. 437-442.

21. Elwood, K. J.; Maffei, J.; Riederer, K. A.; and Telleen, K., “Improving Column Confinement Part 1: Assessment of Design Provisions,” Concrete International, V. 31, No. 11, Nov. 2009, pp. 32-39.

22. FEMA 356, “Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings in Rehabilitation Requirements,” Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2000.

23. Dhakal, R. P., and Maekawa, K., “Reinforcement Stability and Fracture of Concrete Cover in Reinforced Concrete Members,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 128, No. 10, 2002, pp. 1253-1262. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1253)

24. Su, J.; Wang, J.; Bai, Z.; Wang, W.; and Zhao, D., “Influence of Reinforcement Buckling on the Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns,” Engineering Structures, V. 103, 2015, pp. 174-188. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.007

25. Chen, W. F., and Lui, E. M., Structural Stability Theory and Implementation, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1987.

26. Dhakal, R. P., and Su, J., “Design of Transverse Reinforcement to Avoid Premature Buckling of Main Bars,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, V. 47, No. 1, 2018, pp. 147-168. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2944

27. Bae, S.; Mieses, A. M.; and Bayrak, O., “Inelastic Buckling of Reinforcing Bars,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 131, No. 2, 2005, pp. 314-321. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:2(314)

28. Dhakal, R. P., and Maekawa, K., “Modeling for Postyield Buckling of Reinforcement,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 128, No. 9, 2002, pp. 1139-1147. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:9(1139)


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer