Confinement Reinforcement of High-Strength Reinforced Concrete Tied Columns under High Axial Load

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Confinement Reinforcement of High-Strength Reinforced Concrete Tied Columns under High Axial Load

Author(s): Wen-Cheng Shen and Shyh-Jiann Hwang

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 120

Issue: 3

Appears on pages(s): 145-155

Keywords: confinement crosstie; high axial load; high-strength concrete; high-strength reinforcement; lateral drift capacity; reinforced concrete column; seismic hook

DOI: 10.14359/51738505

Date: 5/1/2023

Abstract:
The use of high-strength concrete (HSC) in high-rise buildingscan reduce the size of structural members and increase the residential space. However, the behavior of HSC at ultimate loads is more brittle than that of normal-strength concrete. Hence, the ACI 318-19 building code requires that all the column longitudinal bars be confined by seismic hooks when using HSC (fc′ > 70 MPa [10.15 ksi]) or under high axial loads (Pu > 0.3Agfc′). The requirement for crossties with seismic hooks at both ends might cause a huge impact on the assemblage of the column reinforcement cage during field installation. This research proposes an experimental study of full-scale column specimens with a 600 x 600 mm (23.62 x23.62 in.) cross-sectional dimension subjected to quasi-staticcyclic loading under constant high axial load. These column specimens are composed of both HSC and high-strength reinforcement. Test results show that if crossties with a 90-degree hook at one end are alternated, the column specimen maintains satisfactory seismic performance. This change in detailing can facilitate the field installation of the reinforcement cage for columns using HSC or underhigh axial loads.

Related References:

1. Aoyama, H., Design of Modern High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures, Imperial College Press, London, UK, 2001, 442 pp.

2. Nazari, A., and Sanjayan, J. G., Handbook of Low Carbon Concrete, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2016, 425 pp.

3. ASCE/SEI 7-10, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (7-10),” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2010, 608 pp.

4. Elwood, K. J.; Maffei, J.; Riederer, K. A.; and Telleen, K., “Improving Column Confinement - Part 1: Assessment of Design Provisions,” Concrete International, V. 31, No. 11, Nov. 2009, pp. 32-39.

5. Berry, M.; Parrish, M.; and Eberhard, M. O., “PEER Structural Performance Database User’s Manual (Version 1.0),” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2004, 43 pp.

6. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-11) and Commentary (ACI 318R-11),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2011, 503 pp.

7. CSA A23.3-04, “Design of Concrete Structures,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2004, 214 pp.

8. NZS Committee P3101, “Concrete Structures Standard, Part 1 - the Design of Concrete Structures and Part 2 - Commentary on the Design of Concrete Structures,” Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 2006, 634 pp.

9. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

10. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 623 pp.

11. Elwood, K. J.; Maffei, J.; Riederer, K. A.; and Telleen, K., “Improving Column Confinement - Part 2: Proposed New Provisions for the ACI 318 Building Code,” Concrete International, V. 31, No. 12, Dec. 2009, pp. 41-48.

12. Paultre, P., and Légeron, F., “Confinement Reinforcement Design for Reinforced Concrete Columns,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 134, No. 5, 2008, pp. 738-749. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:5(738)

13. Chang, F. C., “Study on the Confining Effect of Reinforced Concrete Columns using High Strength Materials,” master’s thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2010, 256 pp. (in Chinese)

14. Lio, U. I., “Design of Seismic Confinement of RC Columns using Normal Strength Materials,” master’s thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2014, 289 pp. (in Chinese)

15. Chen, Y. C., “Design of Seismic Confinement of RC Columns using High Strength Materials,” master’s thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2011, 302 pp. (in Chinese)

16. Lin, T. H.; Chen, P. C.; and Lin, K. C., “The Multi-Axial Testing System for Earthquake Engineering Researches,” Earthquakes and Structures, V. 13, No. 2, 2017, pp. 165-176.

17. ACI Committee 374, “Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary (ACI 374.1-05),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2005, 9 pp.

18. ACI Innovation Task Group 4, “Report on Structural Design and Detailing for High-Strength Concrete in Moderate to High Seismic Applications (ACI ITG-4.3R-07),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2007, 62 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer